Thirteen years on the hunt for Buxbaumia viridis in the Czech Republic: still on the tip of the iceberg?

• Autorzy: Hola E. , Vrba J. , Linhartova R. , Novozamska E. , Zmrhalova M. , Plasek V. , Kucera J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Rare epixylic moss Buxbaumia viridis, which is one of the “Annex II” species of the European “Habitat directive”, has been recorded at 124 localities in the Czech Republic in course of the last 13 years. Most of them were discovered in the last five years following a dedicated search at both historical sites of occurrence and new localities with putatively suitable habitat conditions. The recent and historical area of occupancy and extent of occurrence are not obviously different, although most of the recent localities are concentrated in the Western Carpathians and the Hrubý Jeseník Mts. Surprisingly, only 38% of the localities are located in natural forest habitats, of which herb-rich and acidophilous beech forests were among the most commonly inhabited ones. The rest of occurrences were recorded in non-natural forests (habitats strongly influenced or created by man), particularly the coniferous forest plantations. Sufficient amount of decaying wood of the advanced decay stages, as well as sufficient and constant humidity are crucial prerequisites for the occurrence of B. viridis in both types of forests. True epixylic moss Herzogiella seligeri and the liverwort Chiloscyphus profundus were recorded as the most common associated species, while the rest of commonly co-occurring species were facultatively epixylic, ground or ubiquitous bryophytes; other specialized and rare epixylic mosses or liverworts were only rarely recorded. We also designed a potential distribution model for B. viridis based on the distribution of habitats most commonly occupied by the studied moss. Despite the simplicity of the model, its close match with the recent distribution in the Western Carpathians, the Hrubý Jeseník Mts. and Šumava Mts. supports its relevance for the real distribution of B. viridis.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Buxbaumia viridis; moss; locality; bryophyte; threatened species; rare species; Czech Republic

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 83
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.137-145,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hola E.

• Department of Botany, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
• Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Kaplanova 1931/1, 148 00 Prague 11, Czech Republic

autor

Vrba J.

• Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Kaplanova 1931/1, 148 00 Prague 11, Czech Republic

autor

Linhartova R.

• Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Kaplanova 1931/1, 148 00 Prague 11, Czech Republic

autor

Novozamska E.

• Prague Botanic Garden, Nádvorní 134, 171 00 Prague 7, Czech Republic

autor

Zmrhalova M.

• Regional Museum in Sumperk, Hlavní tr.22, 787 31 Sumperk, Czech Republic

autor

Plasek V.

• Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

autor

Kucera J.

• Department of Botany, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Miko L, Hošek M, editors. State of nature and landscape in the Czech Republic. Prague: AOPK ČR; 2009.
• 2. Hallingbäck T, Hodgetts N, editors. Mosses, liverworts, and hornworts: status survey and conservation action plan for bryophytes. Gland:IUCN/SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group; 2000.
• 3. Andersson LI, Hytteborn H. Bryophytes and decaying wood – a comparison between managed and natural forest. Ecography.1991;14(2):121–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1991.tb00642.x
• 4. Vellak K, Paal J. Diversity of bryophyte vegetation in some forest types in Estonia: a comparison of old unmanaged and managed forests. Biodivers Conserv. 1999;8(12):1595–1620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008927501623
• 5. Riffell S, Verschuyl J, Miller D, Wigley TB. Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity – a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manage.2011;261(4):878–887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.021
• 6. Madžule L, Brūmelis G, Tjarve D. Structures determining bryophyte species richness in a managed forest landscape in boreo-nemoralEurope. Biodivers Conserv. 2012;21(2):437–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0192-z
• 7. Söderström L. Conservation biology of bryophytes. Lindbergia. 2006;3(1–2):24–32.
• 8. CECC. Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2013 Nov 25]; Available from: http://www.nature.cz/publik_syst2/ files08/habitats%20directive_official%20text.pdf
• 9. Wiklund K. Phosphorus concentration and pH in decaying wood affect establishment of the red-listed moss Buxbaumia viridis. Can JBot. 2003;81(6):541–549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b03-048
• 10. Wiklund K. Substratum preference, spore output and temporal variation in sporophyte production of the epixylic moss Buxbaumiaviridis. J Bryol. 2002;24(3):187–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/037366802125001358
• 11. Wiklund K, Rydin H. Ecophysiological constraints on spore establishment in bryophytes. Func Ecol. 2004;18(6):907–913. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00906.x
• 12. Dierssen K. Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. Berlin: Cramer in der Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung; 2001. (Bryophytorum bibliotheca; vol 56).
• 13. Plášek V. The moss Buxbaumia viridis (Bryopsida, Buxbaumiaceae) in the Czech part of the Western Carpathians – distribution and ecology.In: Stebel A, Ochyra R, editors. Bryological studies in the WesternCarpathians. Poznań: Sorus; 2004. p. 37–44.
• 14. Vondráček M. Prodromus der Moose des Böhmerwaldes (Bryopsida) I. (Sphagnaceae–Bryaceae). Plzeň: Západočeské muzeum; 1990. (Folia musei rerum naturalium Bohemiae occidentalis: botanica; vol 31).15. Soldán Z. Buxbaumia viridis – a candidate of red lists of bryophytes.Bryonora. 1992;9:40–44.
• 16. Söderström L. Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferous wood in Northern Sweden. NordJ Bot. 1988;8(1):89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1988.tb01709.x
• 17. Kučera J, Váňa J, Hradílek Z. Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and red list and a brief analysis. Preslia. 2012;84:813–850.
• 18. Ódór P, van Hees AFM. Preferences of dead wood inhabiting bryophytes for decay stage, log size and habitat types in Hungarianbeech forests. J Bryol. 2004;26(2):79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/037366804225021038
• 19. Jansová I, Soldán Z. The habitat factors that affect the composition of bryophyte and lichen communities on fallen logs. Preslia.2006;78(1):67–86.
• 20. AOPK ČR. Habitat mapping layer – electronic georeferenced database. Prague: AOPK ČR; 2012.
• 21. Chytrý M, Kučera T, Kočí M, Grulach V, Luetyk P, editors. Katalog biotopů České republiky. Prague: AOPK ČR; 2010.
• 22. Lustyk P, Guth J. Methodology of habitat mapping in the Czech Republic. Prague: AOPK ČR; 2012.
• 23. Ellenberg H, Haeupler H, Hamann U. Arbeitsanleitung für die Kartierung der Flora Mitteleuropas (Ausgabe für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland).Mitt Flor Soz Arbeitsgem Niedersachs. 1968;13:284–296.
• 24. IUCN. IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. Gland: IUCN Species Survival Commission; 2001.
• 25. Evans D, Arvela M. Assessment and reporting under Article 17 of the habitats directive. Explanatory notes & guidelines for the period2007–2012 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2013 Nov 25]; Available from: http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Reporting/Article_17/reference_portal
• 26. ArcGIS 9. Using ArcGIS Desktop. Redlands, CA: ESRI; 2006.
• 27. European Environment Agency. Corine land cover 2000 (CLC2000) seamless vector database [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2013 Nov 25];Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2000-clc2000-seamless-vector-database
• 28. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
• 29. Moose-Deutschland. Internetplattform der Zentralstelle Deutschland, Dienstleistungszentrum für die Darstellung biologischer Daten imInternet [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2013 Nov 25]; Available from: http://www.moose-deutschland.de
• 30. Eionet. Article 17 – reporting under habitats directive [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2013 Nov 25]; Available from: http://forum.eionet.europa.eu/x_habitat-art17report/library/datasheets/species/plants/plants/buxbaumia_viridispdf
• 31. Šubová V, Ambróz J, editors. The atlas of species of European interest of Natura 2000 sites in Slovakia. Český Těšín: FINIDS; 2011.
• 32. Pawlaczyk P, Kepel A, Jaros R, Dzięciołowski R, Wylegała P, Szubert A, et al. Natura 2000 shadow list in Poland [Internet]. Warsaw: WWF; 2004 [cited 2014 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.natura2000.hr/UtilPages/GetDBDocument.aspx?id=133
• 33. Hajek B. Rozmieszczenie, wymagania środowiskowe oraz fenologia rzadkiego mchu Buxbaumia viridis (Moug. ex Lam. & DC.) Brid.ex Moug. & Nestl. w Trójmiejskim Parku Krajobrazowym. Acta BotCassub. 2010;7–9:161–175.
• 34. Cykowska B, Vončina G. Recent occurrence of moss Buxbaumia viridis (Bryophyta, Buxbaumiaceae) in the Kłodzko region (Central and Eastern Sudetes, SW Poland). Čas Slez Zemského Muzea A.2011;60(1):85–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10210-011-0010-y
• 35. Kozik J, Voncina G. Odkrycie bezlistu okrywowego Buxbaumia viridis (Bryophyta, Buxbaumiaceae) w Beskidzie Niskim (KarpatyZachodnie). Rocz Bieszczadzkie. 2012;20:378–383.
• 36. Paciorek T. New locality of moss Buxbaumia viridis (Moug. ex Lam. & DC.) Brid. ex Moug. & Nestl. in relation to its distribution inthe Beskid Sądecki range (Western Carpathians, Poland). Čas SlezZemského Muzea A. 2013;61(3):285–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10210-012-0030-2
• 37. Šafář J. Olomoucko. In: Mackovčin P, Sedláček M, editors. Chráněná území ČR, svazek VI. Prague: AOPK ČR; 2003. p. 290–309.
• 38. Tolasz R, Míková T, Valeriánová A, Voženílek V, editors. Atlas podnebí Česka. Prague: ČHMÚ, UPOL; 2007.
• 39. Hallingbäck T, Lönnell N, Weibull H, Hedenäs L, von Knorring P. Nationalyckeln till Sveriges flora och fauna. Bladmossor: Sköldmossor.Bryophyta: Buxbaumia–Lecobryum. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken,SLU; 2006.
• 40. Chytrý M, Rafajová M. Czech national phytosociological database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia. 2003;75:1–15.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.2014.015