Grzyby endofityczne traw – znaczenie i możliwości wykorzystania w ochronie roślin.

• Autorzy: Panka D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Endophytic fungi of grassess – significance and the possibility of use in biological control of plant diseases

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Research on the possibilities of use of NC11 Neotyphodium coenophialum isolate as a biological control agent was conducted. The highest mycelium growth inhibition of Drechslera sp., Bipolaris sorokiniana, Fusarium equiseti, Gaeumannomyces graminis, Microdochium nivale and F. avenaceum by endophyte isolate in dual culture assay was recorded at 30°C. The highest width of growth inhibition zone (5 mm) was detected for Drechslera sp. A significant effect of the endophyte presence on tall fescue infection by B. sorokiniana and F. avenaceum was stated in a pot experiment. Endophyte infected plants were healthier than E−. There was no effect of endophyte presence on tall fescue infection by Drechslera sp. and F. equiseti.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

grzyby chorobotworcze; grzyby endofityczne; izolaty; kostrzewa trzcinowa; Neotyphodium; ochrona roslin; trawy; zasiedlanie

EN

pathogenic fungi; endophytic fungi; isolate; tall fescue; Neotyphodium; plant protection; grass; fungi inhabiting; fungi colonizing grass

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Progress in Plant Protection
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 50
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: s.878-882,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Panka D.

• Katedra Fitopatologii i Mikologii Molekularnej, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy im.Jana i Jędrzeja Śniadeckich w Bydgoszczy, ul.Kordeckiego 20, 85-225 Bydgoszcz

Bibliografia

• Birckenstaedt E., Eickel P., Paul V.H. 1994. Scoring of grass diseases for the evaluation of varieties. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 17 (1): 193−200.
• Bouton J.H., Easton S. 2005. Endophytes in forage cultivars. p. 327−340. In: „Neotyphodium in Cool-Season Grasses” (C.A. Roberts, C.P. West, D.E. Spiers, eds.). Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, 379 pp.
• Brilman L.A. 2005. Endophytes in turfgrass cultivars. p. 341−349. In: Neotyphodium in Cool-Season Grasses (C.A. Roberts, C.P. West, D.E. Spiers, eds.). Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, 379 pp.
• Christensen M.J. 1996. Antifungal activity in grasses infected with Acremonium and Epichloë endophytes. Aust. Plant Pathol. 25 (3): 186−191.
• Hesse U., Schoberlein W., Wittenmayer L., Forster K., Warnstorff K., Diepenbrock W., Merbach W. 2002. Effects of Neotyphodium endophytes on growth, reproduction and drought-stress tolerance of three Lolium peenne L. genotypes. Grass and Forage Science 58: 407– 415.
• Johnson M.C., Dahlmann D.L., Siegel M.R., Bush L.P., Latch G.C.M., Potter D.A., Varney D.R. 1985. Insect feeding deterrents in endophyte infected tall fescue. Plant Dis. 70: 380−382.
• Lewis G.C. 1996. Effect of cutting height on perennial ryegrass with and without infection with endophyte and ryegrass mosaic virus. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 19 (7): 55−58.
• Malinowski D.P., Belesky D.P. 2000. Adaptations of endophyte-infected cool-season grasses to environmental stresses: Mechanisms of drought and mineral stress tolerance. Crop Sci. 40: 923−940.
• Pańka D. 2005. Infestation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinaceae Schreb.) with Neotyphodium coenophialum and its influence on growth of chosen microorganisms in vitro. Acta Agrobot. 58 (2): 369−380.
• Pańka D. 2008. Occurrence of Neotyphodium lolii and its antifungal properties. Phytopathol. Pol. 48: 5−12.
• Ravel C., Courty C., Coudret C., Charmet G. 1997. Beneficial effects of Neotyphodium lolii on the growth and the water status in perennial ryegrass cultivated under nitrogen deficiency or drought stress. Agronomie 17: 173−181.
• Riccioni L., Monopoli V., Odoardi M. 1994. Endophytic fungi in tall fescue in Italy. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 17 (1): 127−130.
• Saha D.C., Jackson M.A., Johnson-Cicalese J.M. 1988. A rapid staining method for detection of endophytic fungi in turf and forage grasses. Phytopathology 78 (2): 237−239.
• Siegel M.R., Latch G.C.M., Johnson M.C. 1985. Acremonium fungal endophytes of tall fescue and perennial ryegrass: Significance and control. Plant Dis. 69 (2): 179−183.
• West C.P. 1994. Physiology and drought tolerance of endophyte-infected grasses. p. 87−99. In: „Biotechnology of Endophytic Fungi of Grasses” (C.W. Bacon, J.F. White Jr., eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
• Wäli P.R., Helander M., Nissinen O., Saikkonen K. 2006. Susceptibility of endophyte-infected grasses to winter pathogens (snow molds). Can. J. Bot. 84: 1043−1051.