1. Angadi S. V., Cutforth H. W., McConkey B. G., Gan Y., 2003. Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant population under semiarid conditions. Crop Sci., 43, 1385–1366.
2. ASABE Standards, 2006. S358.2. Measurement-forages. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
3. Chen Y., Gratton J. L., Liu J., 2004. Power requirements of hemp cutting and conditioning. Biosyst. Eng., 87, 417–424.
4. Esehaghbeygi A., Hoseinzadeh B., Khazaei M., Masoumi A. A., 2009. Bending and shearing properties of wheat stem of Alvand variety. World Appli. Sci. J., 6, 1028–1032.
5. Grant C. A., Brrown K., Racz G. J., Bailey L. D., 2002. Influence of source, timing and placement of nitrogen fertilization on seed yield and nitrogen management. Can. J. Plant Sci., 82, 629–638.
6. Henke J., Sieling K., Sauermann W., Kage H., 2009. Analyzing soil and canopy factors affecting optimum nitrogen fertilization rates of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agri. Sci., 147, 1–8.
7. Ince A., Ugurluay S., Guzel E., Ozcan M. T., 2005. Bending and shearing characteristics of sunflower stalk residue. Biosyst. Eng., 92, 175–181.
8. Kjellstrom C., 1991. Growth and distribution of the root system in Brassica napus. PP: 722-726. [In:] McGregor, D.I. (Ed.), Proceeding of the 8th International Rapeseed Congress, Saskatoon, Canada. Organizing Committee, Saskatoon.
9. Lancashire P. D., Bleiholder H., Van den Boom T., Langeluddeke P., Stauss R., Weber E., Witzenberger A., 1991. A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119, 561–601.
10. Miller P., McConkey B., Clayton G., 2002. Pulse crop adaptation in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94, 261–272.
11. Morgan C. L., Bruce D. M., Child R. D., Ladbrooke Z., Arthur E. A., 1998. Genetic variation for pods resistant to shattering among lines of oil-seed rape developed from synthetic Brassica napus. Field Crops Res., 37, 1–13.
12. Rathke G. W., Behrens T., Diepenbrock W., 2006. Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 117, 80–108.
13. Saleem M., Cheema M. A., Malik M. A., 2001. Agro-economic assessment of canola planted under different levels of nitrogen and row spacing. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 3, 27–30.
14. Skubisz G., 2001. Development of studies on the mechanical properties of winter rape stems. Int. Agrophysics, 15, 197–200.
15. Skubisz G., Kravtsova T. I., Velikanov L. P., 2007. Analysis of the strength properties of pea stems. Int. Agrophysics, 21, 189–197.
16. Svecnjak Z., Rengel Z., 2006. Canola cultivars differ in nitrogen utilization efficiency at vegetative stage. Field Crops Res., 97, 221-226.
17. Van-Soest P. J., Robertson J. B., Lewis B. A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583–3597.
18. Zuodong Y., Zelin P., Cai W., Yuping D., Yuxiang O., 2007. Composition, structure and mechanical properties of several natural cellular materials. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 2903–2908.