Effect of osmotic stress and post-stress recovery on the content of phenolics and properties of antioxidants in germinating seeds of grapevine Vitis californica

• Autorzy: Weidner S. , Brosowska-Arendt W. , Szczechura W. , Karamac M. , Kosinska A. , Amarowicz R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The tested material consisted of grapevine Vitis californica stratified seeds germinated under optimum conditions (+25°C in water), under osmotic stress (-0.2 MPa in PEG solution) and submitted to recovery after stress (+25°C in water). The germinating seeds were determined to contain tannins, catechins and the following phenolic acids: gallic, caffeic, p-coumaric and ferulic. The acids occurred in free, ester- and glycoside-bound forms. The dominant form of phenolic acids was the ester-bound fraction. Gallic acid was the most abundant phenolic acid in germinating seeds, while ferulic acid appeared in the smallest amounts. Our analysis of tannins demonstrated that osmotic stress depressed their concentration. Presence of catechin group compounds such as catechin and epicatechin was also determined. In each sample epicatechin was dominant. The total concentration of catechin increased under stress conditions and declined during post-stress recovery. Catechins are a constituent of tannins and their increase under osmotic stress is most probably caused by the breakdown of some tannins in seeds germinating under stress conditions. Samples submitted to osmotic stress were also found to contain less of total phenolic compounds, whereas in samples which underwent post-stress recovery the total level of phenolic compounds increased. Compared to extracts from seeds germinating under optimum conditions, osmotic stress depressed the capacity of extract to scavenge DPPH● (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS●+ – 2,2-Azino-bis (3-etylbenzothiazoline-6- -sulfonic acid) free radicals, but the antioxidant activity rose in seeds submitted to recovery after stress. Positive correlation was therefore demonstrated between the total content of phenolic acids in germinating grapevine seeds and the reducing power of extracts obtained from these seeds and their free radical scavenging activity. The results suggest that osmotic stress inhibits the activity of antioxidizing enzymes in germinating grapevine seeds. Thus, the antioxidative defence system is largely blocked under osmotic stress. It seems that a very high oxidoreductive potential in grapevine tissues prior to occurrence of osmotic stress is essential for maintaining proper homeostasis of oxidation and reduction reactions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

osmotic stress; post-stress recovery; phenolic compound content; antioxidative property; germinating seed; seed; grapevine; Vitis californica; antioxidative system; oxidative stress; environmental stress; plant stress

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 80
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.11-19,,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Weidner S.

• Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, M.Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-957 Olsztyn-Kortowo, Poland

autor

Brosowska-Arendt W.

autor

Szczechura W.

autor

Karamac M.

autor

Kosinska A.

autor

Amarowicz R.

Bibliografia

• ALONSO A.M., GUILLEN D.A., BARROSO C.G., PUERTAS B., GARCIAA. 2002. Determination of antioxidant activity of wine by products and its correlation with polyphenolic content. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 5832-5836.
• AMAROWICZ R., WEIDNER S. 2009. Biological activity of grapevine phenolics compounds. In: K.A. Roubelakis-Angelakis (eds), Grapevine Molecular Physiology & Biotechnology, 2nd, edn. Springer Science + Business Media B.V.: 389--405, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2305-6-14.
• AMAROWICZ R., WEIDNER S., WÓJTOWICZ I., KARAMAĆ M., KOSIŃSKA A., RYBARCZYK A. 2010. Influence of low-temperature stress on changes in the composition of grapevine leaf phenolic compounds and their antioxidant properties. Funct. Plant Sci. Biot. 4: 90-96.
• AMAROWICZ R., PEGG R.B., RAHIMI-MOGHADDAM P., WEIL J.A. 2004. Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food Chem. 84: 551-562.
• AMAROWICZ R., WEIDNER S. 2001. Content of phenolic acids in rye caryopses determined using DAD-HPLC method. Czech. J. Food Sci. 19: 201-205.
• AMAROWICZ R., NACZK M., ZADERNOWSKI R., SHAHIDI F. 2000. Antioxidant activity of condensed tannins of beach pea, canola hulls, evening primrose, and faba beans. J. Food Lipids 7: 199-211.
• AMAROWICZ R., PISKUŁA M., HONKE J., RUDNICKA B., TROSZYŃSKA A., KOZŁOWSKA H. 1995. Extraction of phenolic compounds from lentil seeds (Lens culinaris) with various solvents. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 4/45: 53-62.
• BEWLEY J.D., BLACK M. 1994. Seeds: Physiology of development and germination. Plenum Press. New York and London.
• BLOKHINA O., VIROLAINEN E., FAGERSTEDT K.V. 2003. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress:a review. Ann. Bot. 91: 179-194.
• BOHNERT H.J., NELSON D.E., JENSEN R.G. 1995. Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell, 7: 1099-1111.
• CAILLET S., SALMIERI S., LACROIX M. 2006. Evaluation of free radical-scavenging properties of commercial grape phenol extracts by a fast colorimetric method. Food Chem. 95: 1-8.
• DIXON R.D., PAIVA N.L. 1995. Stress-induced phenylopropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7: 1085-1097.
• FAUCONNEAU B., WAFFO T.P., HUGUET F., BARRIER L., DECENDIT A., MERILLON J.M. 1997. Comparative study of radical scavenger and antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds from Vitis vinifera cell structures using in vitro tests. Life Sci. 61: 2103-2110.
• GWÓŹDŹ E.A. 1996. Molekularne podstawy odpowiedzi roślin na stresy środowiskowe. In: J. Barciszewski, K. Łastowski, T. Twardowski (ed.), Nowe tendencje w biologii molekularnej i inżynierii genetycznej oraz medycynie. Poznań. 496-492.
• HAGERMAN A., BUTLER L. 1978. Protein precipitation method for quantitative determination of tannins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26: 809-811.
• HARBORNE J.B. 1980. Plant phenolics. In: Bell E.A., Charlwood B.V. (eds), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology Series 8. Pp. 329-402.
• JANAS K.M., CVIKROVA M., PAŁĄGIEWICZ A., SZAFRAŃSKA K., POSMYK M.M. 2002. Constitutive elevated accumulation of phenylopropanoids in soybean roots at low temperature. Plant Sci. 163: 369-373.
• JAYAPRAKASHA G.K., SELVI T., SAKARIAH K.K. 2003. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds extract. Food Res. Inter. 36: 117-122.
• KELES Y., ONCEL I. 2002. Response of antioxidative defence system to temperature and water stress combinations in wheat seedlings. Plant Sci. 163: 783-90.
• KRANNER I., BECKETT R.P., WORNIK S., ZORN M., PFEIFHOFER H.W. 2002. Revival of a resurrection plant correlates with its antioxidant status. Plant J. 31: 13-24.
• KRYGER K., SOSULSKI F.W., HOGGE L. 1982. Free, esterified, and insoluble-bound phenolic acids. 1. Extraction and purification procedure. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 30: 330-334.
• MANIAK B., TARGOŃSKI Z. 1996. Przeciwutleniacze naturalne występujące w żywności. Przem. Ferm. Owoc. Warz. 40(4):7-10.
• MITTLER R. 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 405-10.
• NACZK M., SHAHIDI F. 1989. The effect of methanol-ammonia- water treatment on the content of phenolic acids of canola.Food Chem. 31: 159-164.
• NEGRO C., TOMMASI L., MICELI A. 2003. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity from red grape marc extracts. Bioresour. Technol. 87: 41-44.
• OH M.M., TRICK H.N., RAJASHEKAR C.B. 2009. Secondary metabolism and antioxidants are involved in environmental adaptation and stress tolerance in lettuce. J. Plant Physiol. 166:180-191.
• OSZMIAŃSKI J. 1995. Polifenole jako przeciwutleniacze w żywności. Przem. Spoż. 3: 94-96.
• OSZMIAŃSKI J., BOURZEIX M. 1995. Preparation of catechin and procyanidin standars from hawthorn (Crataegus azarolus L.) and pine (Pine mesogeensis fieschi) barks. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 4/45: 89-96.
• OSZMIAŃSKI J., LAMER-ZARAWSKA E. 1993. Występowanie i znaczenie tanin w roślinach leczniczych. Wiad. Zielar. 35: 16-17.
• PEKIĆ B., KOVAĆ V., ALONSO E., REVILLA E. 1998. Study of extraction of proanthocyanidins from grape seeds. Food Chem. 61: 201-206.
• PASTRANA-BONILLA E., AKOH C.C., SELLAPPAN S., KREWET G. 2003. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of muscadine grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 5497-5503.
• PISKORNIK Z. 1994. Fizjologia roślin. Wyd. AR w Krakowie. Kraków.
• PRICE N.J., VAN SCOYOC S., BUTLER L.G. 1978. A critical evaluation of the vanillic reactions an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26: 1214-1218.
• RE R., PELLEGRINI N., PROTEGGENTE A., PANNALA A., YANG M., RICE-EVANS C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 26: 1231-1237.
• RUDIKOVSKAYA E.G., FEDOROVA G.A., DUDAREVA L.V., MAKAROVA L.E., RUDIKOVSKIJ A.V. 2008. Effect of growth temperature on the composition of phenols in pea roots. Rus. J. Plant Phsiol. 55: 712-715.
• SMIRNOFF N. 1998. Plant resistance to environmental stress. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9: 214-9.
• SOKÓŁ-ŁĘTOWSKA A. 1997. Próby opracowania i zastosowania preparatów związków fenolowych wybranych surowców roślinnych jako przeciwutleniaczy. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu. Technologia Żywności XI, 319: 99-115.
• SOLECKA D. 1997. Role of phenylopropanoid compounds in plant responses to different stress factors. Acta Physiol. Plant. 19: 257-268.
• SREERAMULU N. 1983. Auxins, inhibitors, and phenolics in bambarranut seeds (Voandzeia subterranea Thouars) in relation to loss of viability during storage, Ann. Bot. 51: 209-216.
• SUN B., LEANDRO C., DA SILVA J.M.R., SPRANGER I. 1998. Separation of grape and wine proanthocyanidins according to their degree of polymerization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46: 1390-1396.
• WEIDNER S., KAROLAK M., KARAMAĆ M., KOSIŃSKAA., AMAROWICZ R. 2009a. Phenolic compounds and properties of antioxidants in grapevine roots (Vitis vinifera L.) under drought stress followed by recovery. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 78: 97-103.
• WEIDNER S., KORDALA E., BROSOWSKA-ARENDT W., KARAMĆ M., KOSIŃSKA A., AMAROWICZ R. 2009b. Phenolic compounds and properties of antioxidants in grapevine roots (Vitis vinifera L.) under low-temperature stress followed by recovery. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 78: 279-286.
• WEIDNER S., KARAMAĆ M., AMAROWICZ R., SZYPULSKA E., GOŁGOWSKA A. 2007. Changes in composition of phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of Vitis amurensis seeds germinated under osmotic stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 29: 283-290.
• WEIDNER S., KRUPA U., AMAROWICZ R., KARAMAĆ M., ABE S. 2002. Phenolic compounds in embryos of triticale caryopses at different stages of development and maturation in normal environment and after dehydration treatment. Euphytica 126: 115-122.
• WEIDNER S., AMAROWICZ R., KARAMAĆ M., FRĄCZEK E. 2000. Changes in endogenous phenolic acids during development of Secale cereale caryopses and after dehydration treatment of unripe rye grains. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 38: 595-602.
• WRÓBEL M., KARAMAĆ M., AMAROWICZ R., FRĄCZEK E., WEIDNER S. 2005. Metabolism of phenolic compounds in Vitis riparia seeds during stratification and during germination under optimal and low temperature stress conditions. Acta Physol. Plant. 27: 313-320.
• YEN G.C., CHEN H.Y. 1995. Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 27-32.
• ZADERNOWSKI R., KOZŁOWSKA H. 1983. Phenolic acids in soybean and rapeseed flours. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 16: 110-114.