Skuteczność mikrodawek herbicydów w systemach chemicznej ochrony buraka cukrowego

• Autorzy: Domaradzki K.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses in chemical protection systems in sugar beet

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The field trials were conducted in the years 2007–2009. Examined herbicide mixtures contained Betanal Progress 274 OF and Safari 50 WG or Lontrel 300 SL, supplemented with Goltix 70 WP, Flirt 460 SC or Venzar 80 WP and adiuvant Atpolan 80 EC. The components of mixtures in two reduced doses (by 50% and 67%) were applied. The conducted trials indicated that the best weed control effect was obtained in microrate systems with Betanal Progress 274 OF + Pyramin 65 WP + Safari 50 WG + Atpolan 80 EC of 50% at dose recommended in classic systems. The activity of herbicides depended on the dose of mixture and type of components. All tested weeding systems based on mixtures (3 herbicides + adjuvant) gave the increase of yield in comparison to standard systems (Betanal Progress 274 OF applied three or four times). The best effect was obtained using the highest doses of herbicides. The conducted trials indicated that the examined microrate systems did not significantly differentiate the yield of sugar.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Progress in Plant Protection
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 51
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: s.1683-1689,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Domaradzki K.

Bibliografia

• Dexter A.G. 1994. History of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) herbicide rate reduction in North Dakota and Minnesota. Weed Technol. 8: 334–337.
• Dexter A.G., Luecke J.L. 2001. Survey of weed control and production practices on sugarbeet in Eastern North Dakota and Minnesota – 2001. Sugarbeet Res. Ext. Rep. 32: 35–63.
• Domaradzki K. 2007. Optymalizacja stosowania herbicydów w systemach chemicznej ochrony buraka cukrowego. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 47 (3): 64–73.
• Krawczyk R., Adamczewski K., Głowacki G. 2007. Wpływ mikrodawek herbicydów na zachwaszczenie i plon buraka cukrowego. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 47 (3): 159–163.
• Paradowski A., Adamczewski K. 2002. Ocena wpływu zmiany technologii odchwaszczania buraka cukrowego na przestrzeni 15 lat. Biul. IHAR 222: 271–277.
• Rola J., Rahban B.A., Marczewski K. 1994. Porównanie systemów chemicznego odchwaszczania buraków cukrowych. Materiały 34. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, cz. 1: 96–103.
• Wilson R.G. 1994. New herbicides for postemergence application in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol. 8: 807–811.
• Wilson R.G., Smith J.A., Yonts C.D. 2005. Repeated reduced rates of broadleaf herbicides in combination with methylated seed oil for postemergence weed control in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol. 19: 855–860.
• Woźnica Z., Adamczewski K., Szeleźniak E. 2004. Stosowanie mikrodawek herbicydów w uprawie buraka cukrowego. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 44 (1): 523–530.