Czynniki kształtujące przepływy nadwyżki bezpośredniej w interwencjoniźmie rolnym

• Autorzy: Kulyk P.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Factors affecting the flow of direct surplus in agricultural interventionism

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule zaprezentowano badania dotyczące próby wskazania czynników kształtujących strukturę i kierunek przepływów nadwyżki ekonomicznej między podmiotami w wyniku oddziaływania polityki rolnej. W rozważaniach zastosowano model równowagi cząstkowej, operujący nadwyżką ekonomiczną. Okres badawczy obejmował lata 1986- 2009. Ocenie poddano 12 krajów OECD. Zaadaptowano mechanizm agregacji danych stosowanych przez Bank Światowy. W ocenie polityki wsparcia sektora rolnego zwrócono uwagę na znaczenie zasobów związanych z sektorem rolnym.

EN

Carried out evaluation of the infl uence of indicators characterizing resources related to the agriculture he showed their essential meaning in the formation of the size, but also structures of retransfers from consumers. This result was obtained in spite of acceptance of restrictive foundations on which bases the model of the economic surplus. One can notice that the part from these factors has an universal character and refers both to retransfers directed from consumers, as and producers. This concerns the net position in the international exchange with agricultural products and the participation of the agricultural land in the total area of the country. The ability to competing internationally prejudges about the size of retransfers directed to the agriculture. Simultaneously more strongly it affects transfers from consumers. The revalorization of resources is therefore particularly essential, when to the reduction surrender abilities to the use them in the traditional production function. Then their „rinsing” is driving to the greater regard of extraproductive functions of the agriculture based just on resources related to the farming. If we will take into account only factors of production then resources related to the earth more strongly shape the size of retransfers from taxpayers however the factor of the work (in broad terms)it showed higher relationships with retransfers from consumers.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 13
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: s.153-157,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Kulyk P.

Bibliografia

• Alston J.M., Carter C.A., Smith V.H. 1993: Rationalizing Agricultural Export Subsidies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 1000-1009.
• Allaire G., Belleting G. 2002: Mutli-functionality and the role of qualities related to product origin in the new European agricultural model: framework for analysis and open question. INRA ETIQ Toulouse – University of Firenze, mimeo.
• Anderson K., Hayami Y. 1986: The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection: East Asia in International Perspective. London, Allen and Unwin.
• Blandford D., Brunstad R.J., Gaasland I., Vårdal E. 2008: Optimal agricultural policy and PSE measurement: an assessment and application to Norway, 82nd Annual Conference. Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester.
• Blandford D., Boisvert R.N. 2002: Multifunctional agriculture and domestic/international policy choice. Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 3, 106-118.
• Bullock D.S., Salhofer K. 2000: Judging agricultural policies: a framework for understanding how we have done it in the past and suggestions as to how we should do it in the future. Paper presented at the symposium “Challenging the Agricultural Economics Paradigm”, Ohio State University.
• Cameron G.T., Porche S. 2007:The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection. The Journal of Politics, 69, 1, 116-127.
• Czyżewski A., Kułyk P. 2009: Konwergencja czy dywergencja mechanizmów wsparcia sektora rolnego? Zesz. Nauk. SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 8, (XXIII), 41-51.
• Czyżewski A., Kułyk P. 2010: Relacje między otoczeniem makroekonomicznym a rolnictwem w krajach wysoko rozwiniętych i w Polsce w latach 1991-2008. Ekonomista, 2, 189-214.
• Drezner D.W. 2005: Globalization, harmonization, and competition: the different pathways to policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 841-859.
• Gardner B.L. 1983: Effi cient Redistribution through Commodity Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 225-234.
• Gardner B.L. 1996: The Economics of Agricultural Policies. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Guyomard H., Le Mouël C., Gohin A. 2004: Impacts of alternative agricultural income support schemes on multiple policy goals. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, 2, 125-148.
• Innes R.D., Rausser G.C. 1989: Incomplete Markets and Government Agriculture Policy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 915-931.
• Kułyk P. 2009: Współzależności międzynarodowe w retransferze nadwyżki ekonomicznej. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA, t. 11, z. 3, 208-213.
• OECD 2008: OECD’s Producer Support Estimate and Related Indicators of Agricultural Support: Concepts, Calculations, Interpretation and Use, Paris.
• Olson M. 1965: The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
• Park J.H., Jensen N. 2007: Electoral Competition and Agricultural Support in OECD Countries. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 2, 314-329.
• Scott A.J., Storper M. 2003: Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 6-7, 37, 579-593.
• [www.fao.database.org].
• [www.stats.oecd.org].
• [www.worldbank.org].

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu