Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Portuguese version of the Ankle Instability Instrument

• Autorzy: Silva D.C.F. , Vila-Boas J.P. , Mesquita C.C. , Maia J. , Santos R. , Peixoto T.A.T. , Brito N. , Sousa A.S.P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. Chronic ankle instability is one of the most common clinical conditions in the general population, especially in adult athletes. The cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported questionnaires that identify and classify this condition contribute to criteria standardization in research but also in rehabilitation. Aim of Study. To validate the Ankle Instability Instrument to the Portuguese population and to investigate its psychometric properties. Material and Methods. Linguistic and semantic equivalence of the original version of the Ankle Instability Instrument to the Portuguese population was firstly performed. The Portuguese version of the Ankle Instability Instrument was then applied to 81 higher education adult students, with (n = 59) and without history of ankle sprain (n = 22). Participants were evaluated two times with an interval of one week to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Ankle Instability Instrument. Results. In the reliability of binary responses based on the test-retest, the tetrachoric correlation coefficient ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. In addition, the Kuder–Richardson coefficient was 0.79 suggesting good internal consistency. Conclusions. Test-retest showed an almost perfect match in all answers between the two moments, which seem to be related to sample characteristics. The internal consistency value was similar to the one obtained in the original version. The Portuguese version of the Ankle Instability Instrument is highly reliable and can be used in clinical practice.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.187-194,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Silva D.C.F.

• Functional Sciences Department, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, School of Health, Center for Rehabilitation Research – CIR, Porto, Portugal

autor

Vila-Boas J.P.

• Porto Biomechanics Laboratory (LABIOMEP), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, CIFI2D, Porto, Portugal

autor

Mesquita C.C.

• Physiotherapy Department, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, School of Health, Center for Rehabilitation Research – CIR, Porto, Portugal

autor

Maia J.

• Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, CIFI2D, Porto, Portugal

autor

Santos R.

• Physics Department, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, School of Health, Center for Rehabilitation Research – CIR Porto, Portugal

autor

Peixoto T.A.T.

• Physiotherapy Department, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, School of Health, Center for Rehabilitation Research – CIR, Porto, Portugal

autor

Brito N.

• Foot and Ankle Surgery Department, Trofa Saude Hospital Matosinhos, Perafita, Portugal

autor

Sousa A.S.P.

• Physiotherapy Department, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, School of Health, Center for Rehabilitation Research – CIR, Porto, Portugal

Bibliografia

• 1. Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, Lohr KN, Patrick DL, Perrin E, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11(3): 193-205.
• 2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation os self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24): 3186-3191.
• 3. Bonett DG, Price RM. Inferential methods for the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005; 30(2): 213-225.
• 4. Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, editors. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington DC, US: American Psychological Association; 1995. pp. 99-136.
• 5. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Publishers; 2006.
• 6. de Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, Figueiredo VG. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30(26): 1959-1965.
• 7. Delahunt E. Neuromuscular contributions to functional instability of the ankle joint. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2007; 11(3): 203-213.
• 8. Denegar CR, Miller SJ. Can chronic ankle instability be prevented? Rethinking management of lateral ankle sprains. J Athl Train. 2002; 37(4): 430-435.
• 9. Docherty CL, Gansneder BM, Arnold BL, Hurwitz SR. Development and reliability of the Ankle Instability Instrument. J Athl Train. 2006; 41(2): 154-158.
• 10. Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014; 44(1): 123-140.
• 11. Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(12): 1140-1146.
• 12. Fong D, Hong Y, Chan L, Yung P, Chan K. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med. 2007; 37(1): 73-94.
• 13. Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, Stauffer JW, Hays RD. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health. 2007; 10 Suppl 2S94-S105.
• 14. Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Caulfield B, Docherty CL, Fong DT, et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Athl Train. 2014; 49(1): 121-127.
• 15. Hadadi M, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Ebrahim Mosavi M, Aminian G, Fardipour S, Abbasi F. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39(16): 1644-1649.
• 16. Hossain M, Thomas R. Ankle instability: presentation and management. Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(2): 145-151.
• 17. Ko J, Rosen AB, Brown CN. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Korean version of the Identification Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI). Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 1-6.
• 18. Kuder GF, Richardson MW. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 1937; 2(3): 151-160.
• 19. Kunugi S, Masunari A, Noh B, Mori T, Yoshida N, Miyakawa S. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39(1): 50-58.
• 20. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(5): 400-417.
• 21. Marôco J, Garcia-Marques T. Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia. 2006; 4(1): 65-90.
• 22. Martinez BR, Lopes Sauers AD, Ferreira CL, de Castro Lugli L, Gama Turchetto PC, Docherty CL, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire. Phys Ther Sport. 2018; 29(1): 1-8.
• 23. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(8): 730-735.
• 24. Morgado FFR, Meireles JFF, Neves CM, Amaral ACS, Ferreira MEC. Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2017; 30(3): 1-20.
• 25. O’Connor SR, Bleakley CM, Tully MA, McDonough SM. Predicting functional recovery after acute ankle sprain. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e72124.
• 26. Raina S, Nuhmani S. Factors leading to lateral ankle sprain: a review of the literature. J Musculoskelet Res. 2014; 17(4): 1-9.
• 27. Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures: a follow up. Phys Ther Sport. 2014; 15(2): 97-100.
• 28. Vuurberg G, Kluit L, van Dijk CN. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in the Dutch population with and without complaints of ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(3): 882-891.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2018.25.4-3