Use of prepubic minilaparotomy in the congenital ureteral ectopia treatment of dogs

• Autorzy: Trebacz P. , Jurka P. , Galanty M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was the assessment of the usefulness of the limited approach to the abdominal cavity (prepubic minilaparotomy) in intramural ureteral ectopia treatment in dogs. Five spayed bitches, from 2 to 8 years of age, with diagnosed congenital ureteral ectopia, were surgically treated. In three cases ectopia was diagnosed in the left ureter, and in remaining two cases in the right one. In the basic physical examination, the general state of the dogs was normal. In detailed examinations, chronic dermatitis and hyperpigmentation at the region of vulva and of thigh rear surface, resulting from their contact with leaking urine, were found in all individuals. In urographic examination, typical changes for ureteral ectopia were found. The surgeries were performed under general anaesthesia. The abdominal cavity was open by medial prepubic 5 cm incision. After dislocation of the bladder outside the abdominal cavity, its lumen was exposed via a ventral cystotomy. After the opening of the bladder, ectopic ureter was localised and a form of ectopia was diagnosed. Further stages of the surgery, aiming at replantation of ectopic ureter, were performed according to the conventional ureteroneocystostomy technique. During postoperative period, fast abatement and mitigation of urinary incontinence symptoms were observed in all the dogs. On the basis of the achieved effects, it can be stated that prepubic minilaparotomy is able to replace the standard operative approach, utilised while replanting ureters in bitches.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 53
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.697-702,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Trebacz P.

• Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Jurka P.

• Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Galanty M.

• Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ashley R., Vandersteen D.: Mini-ureteroneocystostomy: a safe and effective outpatient treatment for unilateral vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 2008, 180, 1621-1625.
• 2. Becker T.: Przeszczepienie moczowodu z wykorzystaniem techniki psoas-hitch i plastyki Boariego. In: Podstawowe operacje urologiczne. Edited by Albers P., Heidenreich A., Czelej, Lublin, 2007, p. 413.
• 3. Berent A.C., Mayhew P.D., Porat-Mosenco Y.: Use of cystoscopic-guided laser ablation for treatment of intramural ureteral ectopia in male dogs: four cases (2006-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008, 232, 1026- 1034.
• 4. Dennis R., Kirberger R.M., Wrigley R.H., Barr F.J.: Handbook of small animal radiological differential diagnosis. Harcourt Publishers Ltd, London, 2001, pp. 188-193.
• 5. Fergany A., Gill I.S., Abdel-Samee A., Kaouk J., Meraney A., Sung G.: Laparoscopic bladder flap ureteral reimplantation: survival porcine study. J Urol 2001, 166, 1920-1923.
• 6. Fossum T.W.: Ectopic Ureter. In: Small Animal Surgery. Edited by Fossum T.W., Mosby Inc., St. Louis, 2007, pp. 646-654.
• 7. Getman L.M., Ross M.W., Elce Y.A.: Bilateral ureterocystostomy to correct left ureteral atresia and right ureteral ectopia in an 8-month-old standard bred filly. Vet Surg 2005, 34, 657-661.
• 8. Gołąb A., Słojewski M., Gliniewicz B., Sikorski A.: Laparoscopic reimplantation of the strictured ureter. Central European I Urology 2009, 62, 46-48.
• 9. Holt P.: Urological Disorders of the Dog and Cat. Manson Publishing Ltd, London, 2008, pp. 134-159.
• 10. Jurka P., Trębacz P.: Alternative method of surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in the spayed bitch. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2009, (in press).
• 11. Marshall F.F.: Minilaparotomy staging pelvic lymphadenectomy. In: Surgery of the prostate. Edited by Resnick M.I., Thompson I.M., Churchill Livingstone Inc, New York, 1998, pp. 51-59.
• 12. Nakagoe T., Sawai T., Tsuji T., Jibiki M., Nanashima A., Yamaguchi H., Yasutake T., Ayabe H.: Colectomy for colon cancer via a 7-cm minilaparotomy. Surg Today 2001, 31, 1113-1115.
• 13. Nakagoe T., Sawai T., Tsuji T., Nanashima A., Jibiki M., Yamaguchi H., Yasutake T., Ayabe H., Shimomura K., Ishikawa H.: A new device that protects from minilaparotomy wound infection in minimally-invasive approaches to colon cancer. Act Medi Nagasakiensa 2001, 46, 55-60.
• 14. Rawlings C.A.: Resection of inflammatory polyps in dogs using laparoscopic-assisted cystoscopy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007, 43, 342-346.
• 15. Röcken M., Stehle C., Mosel G., Rass J., Litzke L.F.: Laparoscopic-assisted cystostomy for urolith removal in geldings. Vet Surg 2006, 35, 394-397.
• 16. Slabaugh T.K. Jr, Marshall F.F.: A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2004, 172, 2545-2548.
• 17. Syrakos T., Antonisis P., Zacharakis E., Takis A., Manousari A., Bakogiannis K., Efthimiopoulos G., Achoulias I., Trikoupi A., Kiskinis D.: Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004, 389, 172-177.
• 18. Winnicka A.: Wartości referencyjne podstawowych badań laboratoryjnych w weterynarii. Ed. SGGW, Warszawa, 2004.