Perceptions of South African academic instructors toward the teaching and learning of anatomy

• Autorzy: Lazarus L. , Sookrajh R. , Satyapal K.S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: Reflecting on teaching is commonly cited as a fundamental practice for personal and professional development. Educational research into the scholarship of teaching and learning anatomy includes engaging in discipline specific literature on teaching, reflecting on individual teaching methods and communicating these findings to peers. The aim of this paper was to formally assess the opinions of senior anatomy instructors regarding the state of anatomical knowledge at their respective institutions. Materials and methods: An open-ended questionnaire was devised consisting of eight direct questions seeking opinions on anatomy teaching, knowledge, potential educational developments and general thoughts on the teaching of anatomy to medical students. These were distributed to senior Anatomy Faculty (identified by the author by their affiliation with the Anatomical Society of Southern Africa) based at the eight national medical schools within the country. Results and Conclusions: A number of key themes emerged. Most senior faculty felt that the standard of medical education at their respective institutions was “good.” However, emphasis was also placed on the “quality of teaching” incorporating clinical scenarios. There were also indications that staff are split into those that are keen to do research and those that are happy to provide teaching to medical students as their primary function. Several challenges such as time constraints within the curricula, lack of cadavers to reinforce knowledge and lack of appropriately qualified staff were highlighted. Recommendations included fostering partnerships with both clinicians and medical scientists into the anatomy curriculum thus improving teaching and research. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 4: 871–878)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.871-878,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Lazarus L.

• Department of Clinical Anatomy, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa

autor

Sookrajh R.

• Department of Curriculum Studies, School of Education, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood Campus, Pinetown, South Africa

autor

Satyapal K.S.

• Department of Clinical Anatomy, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa

Bibliografia

• 1. Bekele A, Reissig D, Löffler S, et al. Experiences with dissection courses in human anatomy: a comparison between Germany and Ethiopia. Ann Anat. 2011; 193(2): 163–167, doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.10.007, indexed in Pubmed: 21167695.
• 2. Bergman EM, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJ. Why don’t they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Med Teach. 2011; 33(5): 403–409, doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.536276, indexed in Pubmed: 21355704.
• 3. Bergman EM, Verheijen IWH, Scherpbier AJ, et al. Influences on anatomical knowledge: The complete arguments. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(3): 296–303, doi: 10.1002/ca.22341, indexed in Pubmed: 24357119.
• 4. Boon JM, Meiring JH, Richards PA, et al. Evaluation of clinical relevance of problem-oriented teaching in undergraduate anatomy at the University of Pretoria. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001; 23(1): 57–60, indexed in Pubmed: 11370144.
• 5. Boon JM, Meiring JH, Richards PA. Clinical anatomy as the basis for clinical examination: development and evaluation of an Introduction to Clinical Examination in a problem-oriented medical curriculum. Clin Anat. 2002; 15(1): 45–50, doi: 10.1002/ca.1091, indexed in Pubmed: 11835544.
• 6. Cahill DR, Leonard RJ, Marks SC. A comment on recent teaching of human anatomy in the United States. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000; 22(2): 69–71, indexed in Pubmed: 10959670.
• 7. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. 2013.
• 8. de Bere SR, Mattick K. From anatomical ‘competence’ to complex capability. The views and experiences of UK tutors on how we should teach anatomy to medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15(4): 573–585, doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9220-0, indexed in Pubmed: 20140495.
• 9. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage. 2011: Apr 27.
• 10. Du Toit DF. Ethics, litigation and teaching of anatomy. South African Med J. 2008; 93(12): 878.
• 11. Fitzgerald JEF, White MJ, Tang SW, et al. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(7): 718–724, doi: 10.1002/ca.20662, indexed in Pubmed: 18773486.
• 12. Gangata H, Ntaba P, Akol P, et al. The reliance on unclaimed cadavers for anatomical teaching by medical schools in Africa. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(4): 174–183, doi: 10.1002/ase.157, indexed in Pubmed: 20544835.
• 13. Hassanzadeh G, Hassanpoor N, Jalali A, et al. Teaching Anatomy: Viewpoints of Iranian Anatomists. Thrita J Med Sci. 2012; 1(2): 62–66, doi: 10.5812/thrita.6434.
• 14. Hegazy AMS. Reflection of the type of medical curriculum on its anatomy content: trial to improve the anatomy learning outcomes. Int J Clin Devel Anat. 2015; 1(3): 52, doi: 10.11648/j.ijcda.20150103.11.
• 15. HPCSA. Core competencies for undergraduate students in clinical associate, dentistry and medical teaching and learning programmes in South Africa. Developed by the Undergraduate Education and Training Subcommittee of the Medical and Dental Professions Board in collaboration with training institutions and the South African Committee of Medical and Dental Deans. 2014. http://www.hpcsa.co.za/uploads/editor/UserFiles/MDB%20Core%20Competencies%20-%20ENGLISH%20-%20FINAL%202014.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2016).
• 16. Iputo JE, Kwizera E. Problem-based learning improves the academic performance of medical students in South Africa. Med Educ. 2005; 39(4): 388–393, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02106.x, indexed in Pubmed: 15813761.
• 17. Katz J. Analytic induction. In International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences. Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam Smelser NJ Baltes PB 2001.
• 18. Kramer B, Pather N, Ihunwo AO. Anatomy: spotlight on Africa. Anat Sci Educ. 2008; 1(3): 111–118, doi: 10.1002/ase.28, indexed in Pubmed: 19177392.
• 19. Lazarus MD, Chinchilli VM, Leong SL, et al. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012; 5(4): 187–199, doi: 10.1002/ase.1281, indexed in Pubmed: 22532497.
• 20. Louw G, Eizenberg N, Carmichael SW. The place of anatomy in medical education: AMEE Guide no 41. Med Teach. 2009; 31(5): 373–386, indexed in Pubmed: 19811128.
• 21. Monkhouse WS, Farrell TB. Tomorrow’s doctors: today’s mistakes? Clin Anat. 1999; 12(2): 131–134, doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:2<131::AID-CA9>3.0.CO;2-L, indexed in Pubmed: 10089040.
• 22. Mothibi M. Shortage of cadavers at SA universities. 2015. http://www.sabc.co.za/news/a/c15ba30049787268a0cda1623266b54e/Shortage-of-cadavers-at-SA-universities (Accessed 14 September 2016).
• 23. Ncayiyana D. Medical education challenges in South Africa. Med Educ. 1999; 33(10): 713–715, indexed in Pubmed: 10583759.
• 24. Ogunranti JO. Challenges and prospects of anatomy in the 21st century. In6th scientific conference–anatomical society of Nigeria, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria–16th October 2008.
• 25. Older J. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon. 2004; 2(2): 79–90, doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(04)80050-7.
• 26. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousands Oaks, Sage 2000.
• 27. Pereira JA, Pleguezuelos E, Merí A, et al. Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Med Educ. 2007; 41(2): 189–195, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02672.x, indexed in Pubmed: 17269953.
• 28. Prince KJ, Scherpbier AJ, van Mameren H, et al. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Med Educ. 2005; 39(3): 326–332, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02096.x, indexed in Pubmed: 15733169.
• 29. Raftery A. Anatomy teaching in the UK. Surgery (Oxford). 2007; 25(1): 1–2, doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2006.11.002.
• 30. Raubenheimer D, Raubenheimer JE, van Zyl S. A scoring framework for assessing anatomy competence of undergraduate preclinical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2016; 9(4): 319–329, doi: 10.1002/ase.1585, indexed in Pubmed: 26588194.
• 31. Satyapal KS, Henneberg M. Anatomy into the next millennium: quo vadis, or simply where to? Clin Anat. 1997; 10(1): 41–3; discussion 44, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:1<41::AID-CA7>3.0.CO;2-W, indexed in Pubmed: 8986387.
• 32. SAQA. South African Qualifications Authority. Developing learning programme for NQF- registered qualifications and unit standards. A step-by-step guide. 2005. 1st ed. Pretoria. Gauteng. South Africa: South African Qualifications Authority p 48. http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/guide/2005/dlp.pdf(Accessed 21 September 2016).
• 33. Schoeman S, Chandratilake M. The anatomy competence score: a new marker for anatomical ability. Anat Sci Educ. 2012; 5(1): 33–40, doi: 10.1002/ase.263, indexed in Pubmed: 22127894.
• 34. Singh R, Tubbs RS, Gupta K, et al. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession? — A review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(10): 1257–1265, doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1507-7.
• 35. Smith CF, Martinez-Álvarez C, McHanwell S. The context of learning anatomy: does it make a difference? J Anat. 2014; 224(3): 270–278, doi: 10.1111/joa.12089, indexed in Pubmed: 23930933.
• 36. Staśkiewicz GJ, Walczak E, Torres K, et al. What do clinicians think of the anatomical knowledge of medical students? Results of a survey. Folia Morphol. 2007; 66(2): 138–142, indexed in Pubmed: 17594673.
• 37. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(2): 83–93, doi: 10.1002/ase.139, indexed in Pubmed: 20205265.
• 38. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians’ attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat. 2005; 18(5): 380–384, doi: 10.1002/ca.20101, indexed in Pubmed: 15971223.
• 39. Yammine K. The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there? Teach Learn Med. 2014; 26(2): 184–188, doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.883985, indexed in Pubmed: 24702556.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0034