Mouth allometry and feeding habits of some Mediterranean fishes

• Autorzy: Karachle P.K. , Stergiou K. I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

Background. Mouth characteristics are considered important yet restraining factors for food acquisition in fishes. Nevertheless, their relations with total length (TL) are not thoroughly examined. In the present study mouth characteristics were estimated for 61 fish species from the northern Aegean Sea and their relations with TL were established, and the relation of mouth area with feeding habits was tested. Materials and methods. TL, horizontal mouth opening (HMO), and vertical mouth opening (VMO) were measured in 61 species, and mouth area MA was estimated. Relations between mouth characteristics and TL were established using power regression, and the validity of the power model was tested, using Student’s t-test. In order to explore whether there is a grouping of species based on their feeding habits, the MA–TL regressions of all species were plotted together and the general regression lines per functional trophic group were compared using analysis of variance. Finally, the relative MA was estimated and related to trophic level. Results. All relations examined were statistically significant (P < 0.05), with only one exception (VMO–TL relation in Dentex dentex). The allometric model (for HMO–TL, MA–TL, and VMO–TL) was valid for the majority of species (52, 47, and 49 species, respectively), with positive allometry prevailing in the HMO–TL and MA–TL relations, and negative allometry in the VMO–TL relations. The analyses employed revealed that MA, for the same TL, increases faster in carnivores than in omnivores, and that in general carnivorous species tend to have larger mouths than omnivorous ones. Finally, there is a strong positive relation between relative MA and trophic level (P < 0.01). Conclusion. There is a strong relation of mouth characteristics to body length and feeding habits. These relations and the way that MA increases in relation to feeding habits could be attributed to structural changes in order for growing fish to meet their increased energetic demands. Establishing such relations is essential for estimating trophic levels of species, which are key parameters for ecosystem-based management models, when data on species’ feeding habits are not available.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 41
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.265–275,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Karachle P.K.

• Laboratory of Ichthyology, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University, Box 134, GR-541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

autor

Stergiou K. I.

• Laboratory of Ichthyology, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece

Bibliografia

• Al-Hussaini A.H. 1947. The feeding habits and the morphology of the alimentary tract of some teleosts living in the neighbourhood of the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaqa, Red Sea. Publications of the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaqa (Red Sea) 5: 1–61.
• Arim M., Abades S.R., Laufer G., Loureiro M., Marquet P.A. 2010. Food web structure and body size: trophic position and resource acquisition. Oikos 119 (1): 147–153. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17768.x
• Boyle K.S., Horn M.H. 2006. Comparison of feeding guild structure and ecomorphology of intertidal fish assemblages from central California and central Chile. Marine Ecology Progress Series 319: 65–84. DOI: 10.3354/meps319065
• Chalkia V.V., Bobori D.C. 2006. Length–length and length–mouth dimensions relationships of freshwater fishes of Northern Greece. P. 21. In: 10th International Congress on the Zoogeography and Ecology of Greece and Adjacent Regions, 26–30 June 2006, Patra, Greece.
• Eggold B.T., Motta P.J. 1992. Ontogenetic dietary shifts and morphological correlates in striped mullet, Mugil cephalus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 34 (2): 139–158. DOI: 10.1007/BF00002390
• Erzini K., Gonçalves J.M.S., Bentes L., Lino P.G. 1997. Fish mouth dimensions and size selectivity in a Portuguese longline fishery. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 13 (1): 41–44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.1997.tb00097.x
• Fordham S.E., Trippel E.A. 1999. Feeding behaviour of cod (Gadus morhua) in relation to spawning. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 15 (1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.1999.00098.x
• Froese R., Pauly D. (eds.) 2011. FishBase. [version 02/2011] http://www.fishbase.org.
• Galis F., Terlouw A., Osse J.W.M. 1994. The relation between morphology and behaviour during ontogenetic and evolutionary changes. Journal of Fish Biology 45 (Suppl. sA): 13–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01081.x
• Gerking S.D. 1994. Feeding ecology of fish. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
• Goatley C.H.R., Bellwood D.R. 2009 Morphological structure in a reef fish assemblage. Coral Reefs 28 (2): 449–457. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-009-0477-9
• Hart P.J.B. 1997. Foraging tactics. Pp. 104–133. In: Godin J.G.J. (ed.) Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford University Press, New York.
• Honda H. 1984. Food acquisition patterns in some demersal teleosts. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 35 (1): 33–54.
• Hugueny B., Pouilly M. 1999. Morphological correlates of diet in an assemblage of West African freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 54 (6): 1310–1325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb02057.x
• Juanes F. 1994. What determines prey size selectivity in piscivorous fishes? Pp. 78–100. In: Stouder D.J., Fresh K.L., Feller R.J. (eds.) Theory and application in fish feeding ecology. Belle W. Baruch Library in Marine Sciences. No. 18. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, USA.
• Juanes F., Conover D.O. 1994. Piscivory and prey size selection in young-of-the-year bluefish: predator preference or size-dependent capture success? Marine Ecology Progress Series 114: 59–69.
• Kaiser M.J., Hughes R.N. 1993. Factors affecting the behavioural mechanisms of diet selection in fishes. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 23 (1–4): 105–118. DOI: 10.1080/10236249309378860
• Kapoor B.G., Smit H., Verighina I.A. 1975. The alimentary canal and digestion in teleosts. Advances in Marine Biology 13: 109–239. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60281-3
• Karachle P.K. 2008. Oikologia tīs diatrofīs tōn sīmantikoterōn ichthyapothematōn tou Voreiou Aigaiou. [Feeding ecology of the most important fish stock in the North Aegean Sea.] PhD Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. [In Greek.]
• Karachle P.K., Stergiou K.I. 2006. Trophic levels of north Aegean Sea fishes and comparisons with those from FishBase. Pp. 22–26. In: Palomares M.L.D., Stergiou K.I., Pauly D. (eds.) Fishes in Databases and Ecosystems. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 14/4.
• Karachle P.K., Stergiou K.I. 2008. The effect of season and sex on trophic levels of marine fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 72 (6): 1463–1487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01809.x
• Karachle P.K., Stergiou K.I. 2010. Intestine morphometrics: a compilation and analysis of bibliographic data. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 40 (1): 45–54. DOI: 10.3750/AIP2010.40.1.06
• Karpouzi V.S. 2001. Merikes morfometrikes parametroi pou schetizontai me tī viologia diaforōn eidōn psariōn stī thalassia periochī tōn Kykladōn. [Some morphometrics parameters related to biology of several fish in the marine area off Cyclades Islands, Greece.] BSc Dissertation. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. [In Greek.]
• Karpouzi V.S., Stergiou K.I. 2003. The relationships between mouth size and shape and body length for 18 species of marine fishes and their trophic implications. Journal of Fish Biology 62 (6): 1353–1365. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00118.x
• Keast A., Webb D. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 23 (12): 1845–1874. DOI: 10.1139/f66-175
• Kramer D.L., Bryant M.J. 1995. Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical stream: 2. Relationships to diet—the long and short of a convoluted issue. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42 (2): 129–141. DOI: 10.1007/BF00001991
• Lleonart J., Salat J., Torres G.J. 2000. Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205 (1): 85–93. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043
• Lukoschek V., McCormick M.I. 2001. Ontogeny of diet changes in a tropical benthic carnivorous fish, Parupeneus barberinus (Mullidae): relationship between foraging behaviour, habitat use, jaw size, and prey selection. Marine Biology 138 (6): 1099–1113. DOI: 10.1007/s002270000530
• Makrakis M.C., Nakatani K., Bialetzki A., Gomes L.C., Sanches P.V., Baumgartner G. 2008. Relationship between gape size and feeding selectivity of fish larvae from a Neotropical reservoir. Journal of Fish Biology 72 (7): 1690–1707. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01845.x
• Muller M. 1996. A novel classification of planar four-bar linkages and its application to the mechanical analysis of animal systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351 (1340): 689–720. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0065
• Palomares M.L., Pauly D. 1989. A multiple regression model for predicting the food consumption of marine fish populations. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40 (3): 259–273. DOI: 10.1071/MF9890259
• Palomares M.L., Pauly D. 1998. Predicting food consumption of fish populations as functions of mortality, food type, morphometrics, temperature and salinity. Marine and Freshwater Research 49 (5): 447–453. DOI: 10.1071/MF98015
• Pauly D. 1994.Why didn’t I think of this? Pp. 74–77. In: Pitcher T.J. (ed.) On the sex of the fish and the gender of scientists. A collection of essays in fisheries science. Fish and Fisheries Series 14, Chapman and Hall, London.
• Peters R.H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
• Piet G.J. 1998. Ecomorphology of a size-structured tropical freshwater fish community. Environmental Biology of Fishes 51 (1): 67–86. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007338532482
• Scharf F.S., Buckel J.A., Juanes F. 2009. Contrasting patterns of resource utilization between juvenile estuarine predators: the influence of relative prey size and foraging ability on the ontogeny of piscivory. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66 (5): 790–801. DOI: 10.1139/F09-030
• Scharf F.S., Juanes F., Rountree R.A. 2000. Predator size–prey size relationships of marine fish predators: interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208: 229–248. DOI: 10.3354/meps208229
• Stergiou Κ.Ι., Karpouzi V.S. 2002. Feeding habits and trophic levels of Mediterranean fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11 (3): 217–254. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020556722822
• Verigina I.A. 1991. Basic adaptations of the digestive system in bony fishes as a function of diet. Journal of Ichthyology 31 (2): 8–20.
• Wainwright P.C., Richard B.A. 1995. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 44 (1–3): 97–113. DOI: 10.1007/BF00005909
• Ward-Campbell B.M.S, Beamish F.W.H., Kongchaiya C. 2005. Morphological characteristics in relation to diet in five coexisting Thai fish species. Journal of Fish Biology 67 (5): 1266–1279. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00821.x
• Wootton R.J. 1998. Ecology of teleost fishes. 2nd edn. Fish and Fisheries Series No. 24. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
• Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu