PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 54 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Nectary structure in dichogamous flowers of Polemonium caeruleum L. (Polemoniaceae)

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The flowers of Polemonium caeruleum are protandrous. The nectary is in the form of a rim encircling the ovary. Secreted nectar accumulates in a chamber located at the bottom of the floral tube and is protected by dense staminal hairs. The nectary tissue is not vascularized, but is supplied by vascular strands that occur near the base of the nectary and which directly supply the stamens. Nectar is secreted via modified stomata located on the upper part of the rim, particularly on the adaxial surface. The number of stomata and the volume and sugar concentration of nectar are greater during the female stage than during the male stage. In both stages, however, the nectar is sucrose-dominant. This paper shows that in P. caeruleum the nectar sugars are not a direct product of current photosynthesis, since plastids of nectary cells are devoid of chlorophyll. The main source of sugars in secreted nectar is the phloem sap, together with starch that accumulates in the nectary cells during the male stage and is then rapidly hydrolyzed during the female stage.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

54

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.61-68,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • University of Warsaw Botanic Garden, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland
autor
  • Department of Botany, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15, 00-950 Lublin
autor
  • University of Warsaw Botanic Garden, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • BAKER HG, and BAKER I. 1982. Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanism and phylogeny.In: Nitecki MH [ed], Biochemical Aspects ofEvolutionary Biology, 131–171. University of ChicagoPress, Chicago.
  • BAKER HG, and BAKER I. 1983. Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE and Little RJ [eds], Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, 117–141. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • CARLSON JE, and HARMS KE. 2006. The evolution of genderbiased nectar production in hermaphroditic plants. TheBotanical Review 72: 179–205.
  • CHALCOFF VR, AIZEN MA, and GALETTO L. 2006. Nectar concentration and composition of 26 species from the temperateforest of South America. Annals of Botany 97:413–421.
  • CHWIL M. 2010. The structure of some floral elements and nectar productions rate of Polemonium caeruleum L. ActaAgrobotanica 63: 25–32.
  • CHWIL M, and CHWIL S. 2011. Micromorphology and ultrastructure of the floral nectaries of Polemoniumcaeruleum L. (Polemoniaceae). Protoplasma 249: 1059–1069. DOI 10.1007/s00709-011-0341-y.
  • DAVIS AR. 2003. Influence of elevated CO2 and ultraviolet-B radiation levels on floral nectar production: a nectarymorphologicalperspective. Plant Systematics andEvolution 238: 169–181.
  • DAVIS AR, and GUNNING BES. 1992. The modified stomata of the floral nectary of Vicia faba L. 1. Development,anatomy and ultrastructure. Protoplasma 166:134–152.
  • ESCALANTE-PEREZ M, and HEIL M. 2012. Nectar secretion: its ecological context and physiological regulation. In:Vivanco JM and Baluška F [eds], Secretions andExudates in Biological Systems, 187–219. Springer,Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • GAFFAL KP, HEIMLER W, and EL-GAMMAL S. 1998. The floral nectary of Digitalis purpurea L., structure and nectar secretion. Annals of Botany 81: 251–262.
  • GAHAN PB. 1984. Plant Histochemistry and Cytochemistry: An Introduction. London Academic Press.
  • GALETTO L, and BERNARDELLO G. 2003. Nectar sugar composition in angiosperms from Chaco and Patagonia(Argentina): an animal visitor's matter? PlantSystematics and Evolution 238: 69–86.
  • HEIL M. 2011. Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends in Plant Science 16: 191–200.
  • HERRERA CM, DE VEGA C, CANTO A, and POZO MI. 2009. Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Annals of Botany103: 1415–1423.
  • JENSEN WA. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry: Principle and Practice. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • LANGENBERGER MW, and DAVIS AR. 2002. Temporal changes in floral nectar production, resorption, and compositionassociated with dichogamy in annual caraway (Carumcarvi, Apiaceae). American Journal of Botany 89:1588–1598.
  • NEPI M. 2007. Nectary structure and ultrastructure. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E [eds.], Nectaries and Nectar, 129–166. Springer, Dordrecht. NEPI M, CIAMPOLINI F, and PACINI E. 1996. Development and ultrastructure of Cucurbita pepo nectaries of male flowers.Annals of Botany 78: 95–104.
  • NEPI M, and STPICZYŃSKA M. 2007. Nectar resorption and translocation in Cucurbita pepo L. and Platantherachlorantha Custer (Rchb). Plant Biology 9: 93–100.
  • NEPI M, and STPICZYŃSKA M. 2008. The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar feature.Naturwissenshaften 95: 117–184.
  • NEPI M, VON ANDERKAS P, and PACINI E. 2012. Sugary exudates in plant pollination. In: Vivanco JM and Baluška F [eds],Secretions and Exudates in Biological Systems,155–185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • NICOLSON S, and THORNBURG RW. 2007. Nectar Chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E [eds.], Nectaries andNectar, 215–264. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • NOCENTINI D, PACINI E, GUANIERI M, and NEPI M. 2012. Flower morphology, nectar traits and pollinators of Cerinthemaior (Boraginaceae-Lithospermae). Flora 207:186–196.
  • PACINI E, and NEPI M. Nectar production and presentation. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E [eds.], Nectaries andNectar, 167–214. Springer, Dordrecht.
  • REN G, HEALY RA, KLYNE AM, HORNER HT, JAMES MG, and THORNBURG RW. 2007. Transient starch metabolism inornamental tobacco floral nectaries regulates nectarcomposition and release. Plant Science 173: 277–290.
  • REYNOLDS ES. 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain for electron microscopy. Journalof Cell Biology 17: 208–212.
  • RUZIN SE. 1999. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • RUTKOWSKI L. 2000. Polemonium caeruleum L. Wielosił błękitny. In: Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K. [eds.],Polska Czerwona Księga Roślin, 310–311. InstytutBotaniki im. W. Szafera i Instytut Ochrony PrzyrodyPAN, Kraków.
  • SCHÖNENBERGER J. 2009. Comparative floral structure and systematics of Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae (Ericales). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 1132–1167.
  • SCHÖNENBERGER J, VON BALTHAZAR M, and SYTSMA KJ. 2010. Diversity and evolution of floral structure among early diverging lineages in the Ericales. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B, BiologicalSciences 365: 437–448.
  • STPICZYŃSKA M, NEPI M, and ZYCH M. 2012. The structure of perigonal nectaries and nectar composition in Fritillariameleagris L. (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics andEvolution 298: 997–1013. DOI 10.1007/s00606-012-0609-5.
  • WIST TJ, and DAVIS AR. 2006. Floral nectar production and nectary anatomy and ultrastructure of Echinacea purpurea (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 97: 177–193.
  • ZYCH M, STPICZYŃSKA M, and ROGUZ K. 2012. Reproductive biology of the red listed species Polemonium caeruleum L. (Polemoniaceae). 26th Annual Meeting of the Scandinavian Association of Pollination Ecologists.25–28 October, Skjaerhalden Sjobuer, Norway.
  • ZYCH M, and WERBLAN-JAKUBIEC H. 2004. Nowe, liczne stanowisko Polemonium caeruleum (Polemoniaceae) naMazowszu. Fragmenta Floristica et GeobotanicaPolonica 11: 400–402.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-da60344d-f284-402a-b5af-baf27ec57793
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.