Analysis of microbial parameters of soil in different tillage systems under sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.)

• Autorzy: Niewiadomska A. , Gaj R. , Przybyl J. , Budka A. , Mioduszewska N. , Wolna-Maruwka A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Evaluating the impact of cultivation systems for improving the management of agricultural soil is difficult. Traditional ploughing cultivation can contribute to soil erosion. An alternative to conventional tillage is conservation tillage. The aim of our study was to determine the influence of different cultivation systems on the biochemical and biological activity of soil under sugar beets. The conventional tillage treatment with soil ploughing to a depth of 35 cm was the control treatment (CT). For comparison, we analysed the following conservation tillage systems consisting of shallow or deep-soil ripping: 1. Tillage to a depth of 35 cm and sowing into stubble mulch (MS35). 2. Tillage to a depth of 15 cm and sowing into stubble mulch (MS15). 3. Tillage to a depth of 15 cm and sowing into white mustard mulch (MG). 4. Strip-till on stubble mulch to a depth of 25 cm and instantaneous beet seed sowing (STS). 5. Strip-till to a depth of 25 cm on white mustard mulch and instantaneous beet seed sowing (STG). The soil samples that were used for biochemical and microbiological analyses were collected during four terms in each year, which coincided with the four consecutive stages of the development of sugar beets. During both years of research we obtained results concerning the influence of different soil cultivation methods on the number of selected groups of soil microorganisms and the enzymatic activity under sugar beets. In 2012-13 the highest bioactivity was noted in the period of the greatest demand of sugar beets for nutrients, at the phase when the rows of plants were closing in. At that time the content of actinobacteria in the soil collected from the sites where STS had been applied was 42% greater than in the soil from theploughing cultivation system. Apart from that, in this same term, whenever conservation tillage was applied the activity of dehydrogenases and phosphatases always increased.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 5
• Opis fizyczny: p.1803-1812,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Niewiadomska A.

• Department of General and Environmental Microbiology, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Gaj R.

• Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Przybyl J.

• Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Budka A.

• Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Mioduszewska N.

• Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

autor

Wolna-Maruwka A.

• Department of General and Environmental Microbiology, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. DZIENIA. S., ZIMNY L., WEBER R. Recent trends in tillage and sowing technique. Bibliotheca Fragm. Agron. 9, 17, 2005.
• 2. RAJEWSKI J., ZIMNY L., KUC P. Effect of different variants of conservation tillage on the technological value of sugar beet roots. Problem of Agric. Engine. 1, 109, 2008 [In Polish].
• 3. KUC P., TENDZIAGOLSKA E. Sugar beet yielding in varying variants of tillage. Fragm. Agron. 28 (3), 63, 2011 [In Polish].
• 4. WEBER R. The impact of growing conservative on environmental protection. Prog. Agric. Sci. 1, 57, 2002 [In Polish].
• 5. KLADIVKO E.J. Tillage system and soil ecology. Soil Till. Res. 61, 61, 2001.
• 6. BIELIŃSKA E.J., MOCEK-PŁÓCINIAK A. Impact of the tillage system on the soil enzymatic activity. Arch. Environ. Prot. 38 (1), 75, 2012.
• 7. GU Y., WAG P., KONG C. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenases and polyphenoloxidase activites in paddy sols influenced by allelophatic rice variety. Euro. J Soil Biol. 45, 436, 2009.
• 8. BRZEZIŃSKA M. The biological activity and its associated processes in organic soils irrigated with purified municipal sewage. Acta Agrophys. 131 (2), 1, 2006.
• 9. MOESKOPS B., BUCHAN D., SLEUTEL S., HERAWATY L., HUSEN E., SARASWATI R., SETYORINI, D., DE NEVE S. Soil microbial communities and activities under intensive organic and conventional vegetable farming in west Java, Indonesia. Appl. Soil Ecol. 45, 112, 2010.
• 10. ZHAO B., CHEN J., ZHANG J., QIN S. Soil microbial biomass ad activity response to repeated drying – rewetting cycles along a soil fertility gradient modified by long term fertilization management practices. Geoderma 160, 218, 2010.
• 11. NIEWIADOMSKA A., SAWIŃSKA Z., WOLNA-MARUWKA A. Impact of selected seed dressing on soil microbiological activity in spring barley cultivation. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 20 (5a), 1252, 2011.
• 12. NIEWIADOMSKA A., SULEWSKA H., WOLNA – MARUWKA A., KLAMA J. Effect of organic fertilization on development of proteolytic bacteria and activity of proteases in the soil for cultivation of maize (Zea Mays L.) Arch. Environ. Prot. 36 (2), 47, 2010.
• 13. MAŁECKA I., SWĘDRZYŃSKA D., BLECHARCZYK A. DYTMAN–HAGEDORN M. Effect of tillage system on the physical, chemical and biological parameters in cultivation of the peas. Fragm. Agron. 29 (4), 106, 2012.
• 14. MARTIN J.P. Use of acid, rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci. 15, 215, 1950.
• 15. GRABIŃSKA-ŁONIEWSKA A. Laboratory classes in general microbiology. Oficyna Wydaw. Politech. Warszawa. 1999 [In Polish].
• 16. THALMANN A. Zur methodik der bestimmung der dehydrogenase aktivität in boden mittels triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). For methodology the determination of dehydrogenase activity in soil means triphenyltetrazolium (TTC). Landwirtschaft Forsh. 21, 3, 1968 [In German].
• 17. TABATABAI M.A., BREMNER J. Use of P-nitrophenyl phosphate for assays of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1, 301, 1969.
• 18. AHEMAD M., ZAIDI A., KHAN S., OVES M., Factors affecting the variation of microbial communities in different agro ecosystems. In: Microbial Strategies for crop improvement. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg: 301, 2009.
• 19. SALAZAR S., SANCHEZ L., ALVAREZ J., VALNERDE A., GALINDO P., IGUAL J., PEIX A., SANTA-REGINA I. Correlation among soil enzyme activities under different forest system management practices. Ecol. Eng. 37, 1123, 2011.
• 20. FRĄC M., LIPIEC J., RUTKOWSKA A., OSZUST K., PÓŁTORAK M. Microbiological properties of soil under cultivation of winter wheat in organic and conventional systems. Acta Agrophys. 18 (2), 245, 2011.
• 21. SWĘDRZYŃSKA D., GRZEŚ S. Microbiological parameters of soil under sugar beat as a response to the long – term application of different tillage systems. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 24 (1), 285, 2015.
• 22. BIELIŃSKA J., FUTA, B., MOCEK–PŁÓCINIAK A. Soil enzymes as bio-indicators of soil health and quality. Libropolis Lublin. 2014 [In Polish]
• 23. NORTCLIFF S. Standardisation of soil quality attributes. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 88, 161, 2002.
• 24. TIAN Y., ZHANG X., LIU J., CHEN Q., GAO L. Microbial properties of rhizosphere soils as affected by rotation grafing and soil sterilization in intensive vegetable production systems. Sci. Hort. 123, 139, 2009.
• 25. NAYAKA D.R., BABU J., ADHYA T.K. Long – term application of compost influence microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical Aeric Endoaquept planted to rice under flood condition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 1897, 2007.
• 26. PASCUAL I., ANTOLIN M.C., GARCIA C., POLO A., SANCHEZ-DIAZ M. Soil microbial activity as biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1877, 2007.
• 27. ACOSTA-MARTINEZ V., ACOSTA-MERCADO D., SOTOMAYOR-RAMIREZ D., CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ L. Microbial communities and enzymatic activities under different management in semiarid soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 38, 249, 2008.
• 28. SARDANS J., PEŇUELAS J., ESTRIARTE M. Warming and drought alter soil phosphatase genes in soil supplied with organic matter. Plant Soil. 289, 227, 2006.
• 29. Furczak J., Turska B. Influence of different soybean cultivation systems on development of microorganisms and phenols content in loess soil. Acta Agrophys. 8 (1), 59, 2006

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/62644