PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 67 | 07 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effect of genetic modification on the health status of transgenic pigs produced with the human α-1,2-fucosyltransferase gene

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of transgenesis on the animal health status, morbidity rate and course of diseases in a herd of transgenic pigs during 6 years of observation. It was evaluated 378 potentially transgenic pigs with the human α-1,2 fucosyltransferase gene, born after artificial insemination. One of the parents was transgenic and the other non-transgenic. Molecular verification of transgenesis was performed in all piglets. Piglets with positive molecular verification were the experimental group (n = 150), and the other, non-transgenic piglets were the control group (n = 228). In the transgenic group, was diagnosed 43 sick animals (28.7%). Their mortality rate was high: out of the 43 sick animals, 24 (55.81%) died of disease, which accounted for 16.0% of the total population of transgenic animals. Recovery was observed in 19 out of the 43 sick animals (44.19%). Out of 228 non-transgenic animals, 55 suffered from disease (24.12%). Twenty-seven of them (49.9%) died of disease, which constituted 11.5% of the whole non-transgenic population. Twenty-eight animals (50.9%) recovered. Transgenesis had no negative influence on the health, morbidity or mortality of animals. A comparison of transgenic and non-transgenic siblings in the same litters reveals that the observed differences are due to reasons other than transgenesis. The most important potential cause is extensive inbreeding.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

67

Numer

07

Opis fizyczny

p.462-466,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Animal Reproduction Biotechnology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice
autor
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1.Bao W. B., Wu S. L., Musa H. H., Zhu G. Q., Chen G. H.: Genetic variation at the alpha-1-fucosyltransferase (FUT1) gene in Asian wild boar and Chinese and Western commercial pig breeds. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 2008, 125, 427-430.
  • 2.Coddens A., Verdonck F., Mulinge M., Goyvaerts E., Miry C., Goddeeris B., Duchateau L., Cox E.: The possibility of positive selection for both F18(+) Escherichia coli and stress resistant pigs opens new perspectives for pig breeding. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 126(1-3), 210-215.
  • 3.Coddens A., Verdonck F., Tiels P., Rasschaert K., Goddeeris B. M., Cox E.: The age-dependent expression of the F18+ E. coli receptor on porcine gut epithelial cells is positively correlated with the presence of histo-blood group antigens. Microbiology 2007, 122(3-4), 332-341.
  • 4.Costache M., Cailleau A., Fernandez-Mateos P., Oriol R., Mollicone R.: Advances in molecular genetics of á-2- and á-3/4-fucosyltransferases. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique 1997, 4(4), 367-382.
  • 5.Greger M.: Trait selection and welfare of genetically engineered animals in agriculture. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 811-814.
  • 6.Janowski H., Szweda W., Janowski T. E.: Szczegółowa patologia i terapia chorób świń. Wydawnictwo ART, Olsztyn 1997, pp. 655.
  • 7.Jura J., Słomski R., Smorąg Z., Gajda B., Wieczorek J., Lipiński D., Kalak R., Juzwa W., Zeyland J.: Production of transgenic pigs suitable for xenotransplantation with the use of standard DNA microinjection. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2004, 4(2), 321-327.
  • 8.Jura J., Smorąg Z., Gajda B., Wieczorek J., Lipiński D., Słomski R.: Uzyskanie transgenicznych świń metodą mikroiniekcji egzogennego DNA. Biotechnologiczne i medyczne podstawy ksenotransplantacji. Część II. Biotechnologiczne podstawy ksenotransplantacji. Z. Smor¹g, R. S³omski, L. Cierpka (ed.), OWN, Poznań 2006, 121-133.
  • 9.Klukowska J., Urbaniak B., Świtoński M.: High frequency of M307a mutation at FUT1 locus, causing resistance to oedema disease, in an autochthonous Polish pig breed, the Zlotnicka Spotted. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 1999, 116(6), 519-524.
  • 10.Nagy B., Fekete P. Z.: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in veterinary medicine. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 2005, 295(6-7), 443-454.
  • 11.Niemann H., Kues W. A.: Application of transgenesis in livestock for agriculture and biomedicine. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2003, 79, 291-317.
  • 12.Pursel V. G., Pinkert, K. F. Miller, D. J. Bolt, R. G. Campbell, R. D. Palmiter, R. L. Brinster, and R. E. Hammer: Genetic engineering of livestock. Science 1989, 244, 1281-1288.
  • 13.Redwan el-R. M.: Animal-derived pharmaceutical proteins. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 2009, 30(3), 262-290.
  • 14.Robl J. M., Wang Z., Kasinathan P., Kuroiwa Y.: Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology. Theriogenology 2007, 67(1), 127-133.
  • 15.Thompson P. B., Hannah W.: Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: A Summary and Analysis of Ethical Concerns. Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol. 2008, 111, 229-264.
  • 16.Zyśk A.: GMO wciąż budzi obawy. Środowisko 2009, 13/14, 24-25.

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-d33de7a1-4017-465c-8e9f-fb1fd4ace21c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.