Differences among Juniperus excelsa populations as revealed at morphological traits

• Autorzy: Yucedag C. , Gailing O.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The comparison of phenotypic trait differentiation and genetic differentiation at selectively neutral genetic markers can indicate divergent selection on traits. Phenotypic trait differentiation (PST) andtwo multivariate analysis methods were used to determine the level of differentiation and relationships among seven Juniperus excelsa populations basedon 13 morphological characters of their cones, seeds, juvenile seedlings and 1+0 year old seedlings. Significant differences among populations were found for all morphological characters (P<0.001) apart from cotyledon length using ANOVA. According to Penrose and Squared Euclidean distances, the southeastern populations Bucak-Kestel and Gölhisar-Gölhisar (0.970; 12.374) were most similar. Aksu-Sorgun andE ðirdir-Barla populations, separated by a mountain range, were the most different populations (4.647; 47.157). Evaluatedas a whole, both multivariate analysis methods gave similar results. Phenotypic trait differentiation (PST) for 1+0 year oldseed lings that were grown in a common environment was similar in magnitude for the majority of traits as genetic differentiation at nuclear microsatellite markers (FST) suggesting the absence of divergent selection on these traits.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 70
• Opis fizyczny: p.65-72,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Yucedag C.

• Bartýn University, Engineering Faculty, 74100, Bartýn, Turkey

autor

Gailing O.

• Michigan Technological University, School of Forest Resources andEnvironmental Science, Michigan, 49931, USA

Bibliografia

• Avºar M.D. 2004. Kahramanmaraþ-Tekir yöresindeki bir boylu ardýç (Juniperus excelsa Bieb.) meþceresinde kozalaktaki tohum sayýsý, dolu tohum sayýsý ve oranýnýn aðaçlara göre deðiþimi ve bu özellikler arasýndaki iliþkiler. KSÜ Science andEngineering Journal 7: 53–58.
• Avºar M.D., Tonguç F. 2003. Evaluation of growth potential of Crimean juniper (Juniperus excelsa Bieb) seedlings for the first growing season under Tekir forest nursery conditions in Kahramanmara º, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 24: 155–159.
• Ayan S., ªevik H., Bilir N. 2005. Grouping of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedstandpopulations in Western Black Sea Region of Turkey by seedling morphological distance. Pakistan Journal of Biology Science 4: 1548–1552.
• Ayaz M. 1980. Anatomy of juniper (Juniperus excelsa) seed. Pakistan Journal of Forests, 30: 99–101.
• Barbero M., Lebreton P., Que’zel P. 1994. Sur les affinite’s biosyste’matiques et phytoe’cologiques de Juniperus thurifera L. et de Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. Ecologia Mediterranea 20: 21–37.
• Baytop T. 1999. Türkiye’de bitkilerle tedavi. Nobel Týp Kitapevleri Pub. Ýstanbul.
• Browicz K., Zieliński J. 1982. Chorology of trees and shrubs in south-west Asia andad jacent regions. Warszawa–Poznań, Polish Scientific Pub. Poland.
• Çolak A.H., Rotherham I.D. 2007. Classification of Turkish forests by altitudinal zones to improve silvicultural practice: a case-study of Turkish high mountain forests. International Forestry Review 9: 641–652.
• Conner J.K. Hartl D.L. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
• Delgado J.V., Barba C., Camacho M.E., Sereno F.T.P.S., Martinez A., Vega-Pla J.L. 2001. Caracterización de los animales domésticos en Espańa. Animal Genetic Resources Information 29: 7–18.
• Douaihy B., Vendramin G.G., Boratyński A., Machon N., Dagher-Kharrat M.B. 2011. High genetic diversity with moderate differentiation in Juniperus excelsa from Lebanon andthe eastern Mediterranean region. AoB Plants 2011: 1–14.
• Douaihy B., Sobierajska K., Jasinska AK., Boratynska K., Ok T., Romo A., Machon A., Didukh Y., Bou
• Dagher-Kharrat M., Boratynski A.. 2012. Morphological versus molecular markers to describe variability in Juniperus excelsa subsp. excelsa (Cupressaceae). AoB Plants pls13 doi:10.1093/aobpla/pls013
• Eliçin G. 1977. Türkiye doðal ardýç (Juniperus L.) taksonlarýnýn yayýlýþlarý ile önemli morfolojik ve anatomik özellikleri üzerine araþtýrmalar. ÝÜForestry Faculty Pub. Ýstanbul.
• Eriksson G., Ekberg I. 2001. An introduction to forest genetics. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala.
• Felsenstein J. 1989. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (Ver. 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166.
• Ge S., Hong D.Y. 1995. Biosystematic studies on Adenophora potaninii Korsh. complex (Campanulaceae) III. Genetic variation andtaxonomic value of morphological characters. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 33: 433–443.
• Gezer A., Gülcü S., Yücedað C. 2006. Ormancýlýkta bitki genetiði ve ýslahýna giriþ, Süleyman Demirel University Pub., Isparta.
• Gülcü S., Gültekin, H.C. 2005. Göller Yöresi boylu ardýç (Juniperus excelsa Bieb.) orijinlerinin morfolojik fidan kalite kriterleri bakýmýndan karþýlaþtýrýlmasý. Journal of Artvin Forestry Faculty 6: 121–128.
• Gültekin H.C. 2007. Türkiye Ardýç (Juniperus L.) türlerinin ekolojisi ve silvikültür teknikleri. TMMOB Forest Engineering Chamber Pub. Ankara.
• Mal T.K., Lovett-Doust J.L. 2005. Phenotypic plasticity in vegetative andreprod uctive traits in an invasive weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), in response to soil moisture. American Journal of Botany 92: 819–825.
• Manly B.F.J. 2005. Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. Florida.
• Marcysiak K., Mazur M., Romo A., Montserrat J.M., Didukh Y., Boratynska K., Jasinska A., Kosinski P., Boratynski A. 2007. Numerical taxonomy of Juniperus thurifera, J.excelsa and J.foetidissima (Cupressaceae) basedon morphological characters. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 155: 483–495.
• Mazur M., Boratynska K., Marcysiak K., Didukh Y., Romo A., Kosinski P., Boratynski A. 2004. Low level of inter-populational differentiation in Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. (Cupressaceae). Dendrobiology 52: 39–46.
• Özdamar K. 2004. Paket programlarla istatistiksel veri analizi-1. Kaan Bookshop. Eskiºehir.
• Peakall R., Smouse P. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching andresearch. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295.
• Pujol B., Wilson A.J., Ross R.I.C., Pannell J.R. 2008. Are Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons for natural populations meaningful? Molecular Ecology 17: 4782–4785.
• Raeymaekers J.A.M., Van Houdt J.K.J., Larmuseau M.H.D., Geldof S., Volckaert F.A.M. 2007. Divergent selection as revealedby P-ST andQTL-based F-ST in three-spinedstickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations along a coastal-inlandgradient. Molecular Ecology 16: 891–905.
• Saatçioðlu F. 1969. Silvikültürün biyolojik esaslarý ve prensipleri. ÝÜ Forestry Faculty Pub. Ýstanbul.
• SPSS Inc. 2011. SPSS 20.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall Public. New Jersey.
• Sevik H., Ayan S., Turna I., Yahyaoðlu Z. 2010. Genetic diversity among populations in Scotch pine (Pinus silvestris L.) seedstand s of Western Black Sea Region in Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 7266–7272.
• Spitze K. 1993. Population structure in Daphnia obtusa – quantitative genetic andallozymic variation. Genetics 135: 367–374.
• Turna I., Uçler A.O., Yahyaoðlu Z. 2001. Genetic analyses of isoenzyme variations in cilicican fir(Abies cilicica Carr). Punjab University Research Bulletin 51: 99–107.
• Turna I., Yahyaoðlu Z., Yüksek F., Ayaz F.A., Güney D. 2006. Morphometric andelectrophoretic analysis of 13 populations of Anatolian black pine in Turkey. Journal Environmental Biology 27: 491–497.
• Uçar G., Balaban M. 2002. The composition of volatile extractives from the woodof Juniperus excelsa, Juniperus foetidissima and Juniperus oxycedrus. Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 60: 356–362.
• Whitlock M.C. 2008. Evolutionary inference from Q(ST). Molecular Ecology 17: 1885–1896.
• Yahyaoðlu Z., Demirci A., Bilir N., Genç M. 2001. Comparison of 22 Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) origins by seedling morphological distance. Turkish Journal of Biology 25: 221–224.
• Yaltýrýk F. 1993. Dendroloji ders kitabý I. Gymnospermae (açýk tohumlular). ÝÜ Forestry Faculty Pub. Ýstanbul.
• Yang J. 1991. Infraspecific variation in plant andthe exploring methods. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 9: 185–195.
• Yücedað C., Gezer A., Orhan H. 2010. The genetic variation in Crimean juniper populations from the Lakes District of Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 15: 5487–5492.
• Yücedað C., Gailing O. 2013. Genetic variation and differentiation in Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. populations in Turkey. Trees- Structure andFunction. DOI 10.1007/s00468-012-0807-3.
• Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. ed. 4, Prentice-Hall, 663 pp. New Jersey.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu