AFLP analysis reveals infraspecific phylogenetic relationships and population genetic structure of two species of Aconitum in Central Europe

• Autorzy: Mitka J. , Boron P. , Wroblewska A. , Baba W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The genetic diversity of two Aconitum species endemic to the Carpathian Mountains and Sudetes was studied. A reticulate evolution between them was earlier postulated as an effect of secondary contact. The genetic diversity at the individual and taxonomic levels was examined across the entire geographical ranges of the taxa in 11 populations based on 247 AFLP markers found in 112 individuals in the Sudetes and Western Carpathians. The overall genetic differentiation was greater within the Sudetic A. plicatum (Fst = 0.139, P < 0.001) than within the Carpathian A. firmum (Fst = 0.062, P < 0.001), presumably due to the long-lasting geographic isolation between the Giant Mts and Praděd (Sudetes) populations of the species. Interestingly, relatively distant and presently isolated populations of A. plicatum and A. f. subsp. maninense share a part of their genomes. It could be an effect of their common evolutionary history, including past and present reticulations. The introgression among infraspecific taxa of Aconitum is common, probably as a result of seed dispersal within a distance of ca. 20 km (Mantel's r = 0.36, P = 0.01). Aconitum f. subsp. maninense had the highest genetic diversity indices: Nei's h and rarefied FAr, and divergence index DW (P < 0.05), pointing to its presumably ancient age and long-term isolation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

AFLP method; phylogenetic relationship; population structure; genetic structure; Aconitum; taxonomy; population genetics; evolution; Sudetes Mountains; Central Europe

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 84
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.267-276,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Mitka J.

• Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Krakow, Poland

autor

Boron P.

• Institute of Forest Ecosystem Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 29 Listopada 46, 31-425 Krakow, Poland

autor

Wroblewska A.

• Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, Ciolkowskiego 1j, 15-245 Bialystok, Poland

autor

Baba W.

• Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.Ilnicki T, Mitka J. Chromosome numbers in Aconitum sect. Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) from the Carpathians. Caryologia. 2009;62:198-203.
• 2.Ilnicki T, Mitka J. Chromosome numbers in Aconitum sect. Cammarum (Ranunculaceae) from the Carpathians. Caryologia. 2011;64:446-452.
• 3.Mitka J, Sutkowska A, Ilnicki T, Joachimiak AJ. Reticulate evolution of high-alpine Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) in the Eastern Sudetes and Western Carpathians (Central Europe). Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot. 2007;49:15-26.
• 4.Mitka J. The genus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) in Poland and adjacent countries. A phenetic-geographic study. Cracow: Institute of Botany of Jagiellonian University; 2003.
• 5.Starmühler W, Mitka J. Systematics and chorology of Aconitum sect. Napellus (Ranunculaceae) and its hybrids in the Northern Carpathians and Forest Carpathians. Thaiszia. 2001;10:115-136.
• 6.Kadota Y. A revision of Aconitum subgenus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) of East Asia. Utsunomiya: Sanwa Shoyaku Company, Ltd.; 1987.
• 7.Kita Y, Ito M. Nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and phylogeny in East Asian Aconitum subgen. Aconitum (Ranunculaceae), with special reference to extensive polymorphism in individual plants. Plant Syst Evol. 2000;225:1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985455
• 8.Krzakowa M, Szweykowski J. A natural hybrid between two different rather old then relatively recent hybridization pointed the previous cytogenetic investigations [3] and relatively wide distribution of the Sudetic genetic stock in the Western Carpathian Aconitum in Poland and Slovakia. However, the presumed old genetic relations were blurred by a relatively new during secondary contacts in the Quaternary glacia-tions [3]. The gene-flow was mainly from the Sudetes to the Carpathians, and only negligible in the opposite direction. It could be interpreted in the light of various cytogenetic structure of the Sudetic and Carpathian species. Accordingly, A. plicatum should be considered as the oldest, taking its au-toploidy, and A. firmum as an allopolyploid descendant, with some chromosome segments originated from A. plicatum [3]. In the A. firmum group, the A. f. subsp. maninense had the greatest genetic links with A. plicatum. The taxon had also the highest genetic specificity in the Western Carpathians, considering its divergence DW index and indices of genetic diversity, h and FAr. It seems that within A. firmum complex A. f. subsp. maninense has the most relict character and the longest evolutionary history. The problem needs further studies.Aconitum species (Ranunculaceae, Dicotyledones) from the Tatry Mountains. Bull Acad Pol Sci Lett Ser B. 1977;25:223-225.
• 9. Zieliński R. An electrophoretic and cytological study of hybridization between A. napellus ssp. skerisorae (2n = 32) and A. variegatum (2n = 16). I. Electrophoretic evidence. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 1982;51:453-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1982.042
• 10.Zieliński R. An electrophoretic and cytological study of hybridization between A. napellus ssp. skerisorae (2n = 32) and A. variegatum (2n = 16). II. Cytological evidence. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 1982;51:465-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1982.043
• 11.Stebbins GL. Polyploidy, hybrididization and invasion of new habitats. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1985;72:824-832. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2399224
• 12.Sutkowska A, Boroń P, Mitka J. Natural hybrid zone of Aconitum species in the Western Carpathians: Linnaean taxonomy and ISSR fingerprinting. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot. 2013;55:114-126. http://dx.doi. org/10.2478/abcsb-2013-00015
• 13.Aleksandrowski P, Mazur S. Collage tectonics in the northeasternmost part of the Variscan Belt: the Sudetes, Bohemian Massif, In: Winchester JA, Pharaoh TC, Vernirers J, editors. Palaeozoic amalgamation in Central Europe. London: Geological Society; 2002. http://dx.doi. org/10.1144/gsl.sp.2002.201.01.12
• 14.Kryza R, Mazur S, Oberc-Dziedzic T. The Sudetic geological mosaic: Insights into the root of the Variscan orogen. Przegląd Geologiczny. 2004;52:761-773.
• 15.Ozenda P. La végétation de la chaíne Alpine dans léspace montagnard européen. Paris: Masson; 1985.
• 16.Rögl von F. Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean and Paratethys Seaways (Oligocene to Miocene). Ann Nat Hist Mus Wien. 1998;99A:279-310.
• 17.Golonka J, Krobicki M, Oszczypko N, Ślączka A. Palinspastic modelling and Carpathian phanerozoic palaeogeographical maps, In: Oszczypko N, Uchman A, Malata E, editors. Palaeotectonic evolution of the Outer Carpathian and Pieniny Klippen Belt Basins. Kraków: Instytut Nauk Geologicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2006.
• 18.Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, et al. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:4407-4414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
• 19.Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S. Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologist and evolutionist. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:3737-3758. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03435.x
• 20.Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3321-3323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.70.12.3321
• 21.Krauss SL. Unbiased gene diversity estimates from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Mol Ecol. 2000;9:1241-1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01001.x
• 22.Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldan-Ruiz I. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:139-151. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01415.x
• 23.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2015 May 27]; Available from: http:// cran.r-project.org/
• 24.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-4 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2015 May 27]; Available from: http:// cran.r-project.org/
• 25.Schönswetter P, Tribsch A. Vicariance and dispersal in the alpine perennial Bupleurum stellatum L. (Apiaceae). Taxon. 2005;54:725-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065429
• 26.Nei M, Li WH. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in term of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:5269-5273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
• 27.Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89:583-590.
• 28.Dray S, Dufour AB. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Soft. 2007;22:1-20.
• 29.Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:254-267. http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/molbev/msj030
• 30.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945-959.
• 31.Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164:1567-1587.
• 32.Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:574-578. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
• 33.Ehrich D. AFLPDAT: a collection of R functions for convenient handling of AFLP data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:603-604. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01380.x
• 34.Waples RS, Gaggiotti O. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:1419-1439. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02890.x
• 35.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611-2620. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
• 36.Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005;1:47-50.
• 37.Sokal RR. Spatial data analysis and historical processes. In: Diday E, Escoufier Y, Lebart L, Pages J, Schektman Y, Tomassone R, editors. Data analysis and informatics, IV. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1986.
• 38.Ogden NL, Sokal RR. Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool. 1986;35:608-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2413120
• 39.Pawłowski B. Die Karpaten und die Sudeten - eine vergleichende pflanzengeographische Studie. Arch Naturschutz Landschaftsforch. 1969;9:251-363.
• 40.Starkel L. Geografia Polski - środowisko przyrodnicze. Warszawa: PWN; 1991.
• 41.Stachurska-Swakoń A, Cieślak E, Ronikier M. Phylogeogra-phy of a subalpine tall-herb Ranunculus platanifolius (Ranun-culaceae) reveals two main genetic lineages in the European mountains. Bot J Linn Soc. 2013;171(2):413-428. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01323.x
• 42.Kwiatkowski P, Krahulec F. The distribution of high mountain species of vascular plants within the mountains of the Sudetic system. In: Zemanek B, editor. Geobotanist and taxonomist. A volume dedicated to Professor Adam Zając on the 70th anniversary of his birth. Cracow: Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University; 2011. p. 69-89.
• 43.Ronikier R, Costa A, Fuertes Aguilar J, Nieto Feliner G, Küpfer P, Mirek Z. Phylogeography of Pulsatilla vernalis (L.) Mill. (Ranunculaceae): chloroplast DNA reveals two evolutionary lineages across Central Europe and Scandinavia. J Biogeogr. 2011;35:1650-1664. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01907.x

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.2015.012