Temporal specificity of latent inhibition in rats with daily water restriction prior to taste conditioning

• Autorzy: Molero-Chamizo A. , Rivera-Urbina G.N.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Temporal specificity of latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) has been demonstrated after prolonged habituation to temporal contexts in the stages preceding conditioning, and it has been eliminated by restricting consumption during conditioning. However, it is not known if latent inhibition of CTA is still dependent on the temporal context when fluid consumption is limited in the stages prior to conditioning. We tested temporal specificity of latent inhibition in rats with (different time of day for the conditioning stage) and without (same time of day for pre‑exposure and conditioning stages) temporal changes on the conditioning day. All animals had limited access to water in the morning sessions of the stages prior to the conditioning day and 15 min of free access to fluid in the evening sessions of these stages. Compared to animals without temporal changes between stages, animals with a different temporal context during conditioning did not show evidence of latent inhibition. Unlike the effects observed after taste stimulus restrictions during conditioning, these results suggest that the temporal specificity of latent inhibition of CTA is not abolished when access to water is limited in the stages preceding conditioning.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 80
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.99-107,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Molero-Chamizo A.

• Department of Psychobiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

autor

Rivera-Urbina G.N.

• Autonomous University of Baja California, Ensenada, Mexico

Bibliografia

• Benstaali C, Mailloux A, Bogdan A, Auzéby A, Touitou Y (2001) Circadian rhythms of body temperature and motor activity in rodents. Their relationships with the light‑dark cycle. Life Sci 68: 2645–2656.
• Bernstein IL (1999) Taste aversion learning: a contemporary perspective. Nutrition 15: 229–234.
• Bures J, Buresova O, Ivanova SF (1991) Brain stem mechanisms of conditioned taste aversion learning in rats. Arch Int Physiol Biochim Biophys 99: A131–134.
• De la Casa LG, Díaz E (2013) Contextual control of flavor neophobia. Physiol Behav 118: 45–51.
• De la Casa LG, Díaz E, Lubow RE (2003) Effects of post‑treatment retention interval and context on neophobia and conditioned taste aversion. Behav Processes 63: 159–170.
• De la Casa G, Lubow RE (1995) Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: The roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure. Neurobiol Learn Mem 64: 125–132.
• De la Casa LG, Lubow RE (2001) Latent inhibition with a  response time measure from a within‑subject design: Effects of number of preexposures, masking task, context change, and delay. Neuropsychology 15: 244–253.
• Escobar M, Arcediano F, Miller RR (2002) Latent inhibition and contextual associations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 28: 123–136.
• Falk JL, Titlebaum LF (1963) Saline solution preference in the rat: Further demonstrations. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56: 337–342.
• Flores VL, Moran A, Bernstein M, Katz DB (2016) Preexposure to salty and sour taste enhances conditioned taste aversion to novel sucrose. Learn Mem 23: 221–228.
• González F, Morillas E, Hall G (2015) Latent inhibition in flavor‑preference conditioning: Effects of motivational state and the nature of the rein‑forcer. Learn Behav 43: 376–383.
• Hall G, Channell S (1986) Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Q J Exp Psychol B 38: 121–139.
• Heyer BR, Taylor‑Burds CC, Mitzelfelt JD, Delay ER (2004) Monosodium glutamate and sweet taste: discrimination between the tastes of sweet stimuli and glutamate in rats. Chem Senses 29: 721–729.
• Lubow RE (2009) Conditioned taste aversion and latent inhibition: a  review. In: Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes (Reilly S, Schachtman TR, Ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US, p. 37–57.
• Lubow RE, De La Casa LG (2005) There is a time and a place for everything: Bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time‑induced context differentiation. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 806–821.
• Lubow RE, Weiner I (2010) Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US. Lukoyanov NV, Pereira PA, Mesquita RM, Andrade JP (2002) Restricted feeding facilitates time‑place learning in adult rats. Behav Brain Res 134: 283–290.
• Manrique T, Molero A, Ballesteros MA, Morón I, Gallo M, Fenton AA (2004) Time of day‑dependent latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversions in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82: 77–80.
• Mark GP, Blander DS, Hoebel BG (1991) A conditioned stimulus decreases extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens after the development of a learned taste aversion. Brain Res 551: 308–310.
• Molero‑Chamizo A (2013) Excitotoxic lesion of the hippocampus of Wistar rats disrupts the circadian control of the latent inhibition of taste aversion learning. Brain Res 1533: 105–113.
• Molero‑Chamizo A (2017) Circadian‑temporal context and latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion: Effect of restriction in the intake of the conditioned taste stimulus. Learn Behav 45: 157–163.
• Molero‑Chamizo A (2018) Changes in the time of day of conditioning with respect to the preexposure interfere with the latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Behav Processes 146: 22–26.
• Molero‑Chamizo A, Rivera‑Urbina GN (2017) Effects of temporal contexts and contextual habituation on latent inhibition. Psicothema 29: 346–351.
• Molero A, Moron I, Ballesteros MA, Manrique T, Fenton A, Gallo M (2008) Erratum: Hippocampus, temporal context and taste memories. Chemical Senses 30: 160–161.
• Morón I, Manrique T, Molero A, Ballesteros MA, Gallo  M, Fenton A (2002) The contextual modulation of conditioned taste aversions by the physical environment and time of day is similar. Learn Mem 9: 218–223.
• Nowlis GH, Frank ME, Pfaffmann C (1980) Specificity of acquired aversions to taste qualities in hamsters and rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94: 932–942.
• Pace‑Schott EF, Spencer RMC, Vijayakumar S, Ahmed NAK, Verga PW, Orr SP, Pitman RK, Milad MR (2013) Extinction of conditioned fear is better learned and recalled in the morning than in the evening. J Psychiatr Res 47: 1776–1784.
• Pearce JM, Bouton ME (2001) Theories of associative learning in animals. Annu Rev Psychol 52: 111–139.
• Pearce JM, Hall G (1980) A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol Rev 87: 532–552.
• Quintero E, Díaz E, Vargas JP, Schmajuk N, López JC, De la Casa LG (2011) Effects of context novelty vs. familiarity on latent inhibition with a conditioned taste aversion procedure. Behav Processes 86: 242–249.
• Quintero E, Vargas JP, Diaz E, Escarabajal MD, Carrasco M, López JC (2014) c‑Fos positive nucleus reveals that contextual specificity of latent inhibition is dependent of insular cortex. Brain Res Bull 108: 74–79.
• Rodríguez G, Alonso G (2002) Latent inhibition as a function of CS intensity in taste aversion learning. Behav Processes 60: 61–67.
• Rosas JM, Bouton ME (1997) Renewal of a conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one. Learn Motiv 28: 216–229.
• Smith ME, Norgren R, Grigson PS (2004) A mixed design reveals that glucose moieties facilitate extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats. Learn Behav 32: 454–462.
• Stryjek R, Modlińska K, Turlejski K, Pisula  W (2013) Circadian rhythm of outsidenest activity in wild (WWCPS), albino and pigmented laboratory rats. PLoS One 8: e66055.
• Yamamoto T (1993) Neural mechanisms of taste aversion learning. Neurosci Res 16: 181–185.
• Yamamoto T, Shimura T, Sako N, Yasoshima Y, Sakai N (1994) Some critical factors involved in formation of conditioned taste aversion to sodium chloride in rats. Chem Senses 19: 209–217.
• Yamamoto T, Yuyama N (1987) On a neural mechanism for cortical processing of taste quality in the rat. Brain Res 400: 312–320.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ane-2020-010