Intercropping barley and pea at uniform and alternate row arrangement of the cereal component

• Autorzy: Sobkowicz P. , Tendziagolska E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

field pea; Pisum sativum; Fidelia cultivar; Wiato cultivar; spring barley; Hordeum vulgare; plant lodging; competition; facilitation; row spacing; resource complementarity

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Agronomy
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 18
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume18/issue2/art-06.html

Twórcy

autor

Sobkowicz P.

• Department of Agroecosystems and Green Areas Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Tendziagolska E.

• Department of Agroecosystems and Green Areas Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Andersen M.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Ambus P., Jensen E.S., 2004. Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil, 266, 273–287.
• Annicchiarico P., Iannucci A., 2008. Adaptation strategy, germplasm type and adaptive traits for field pea improvement in Italy based on variety responses across climatically contrasting environments. Field Crops Res., 108, 133–142.
• Bedoussac L., Justes E., 2010. The efficiency of a durum wheat-winter pea intercrop to improve yield and wheat grain protein concentration depends on N availability during early growth. Plant Soil, 330, 19–35.
• Brinkman M.A., Luk T.M., Rutledge J.J., 1979. Performance of spring barley in narrow rows. Agron. J., 71, 913–916.
• Callaway R.M., 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Bot. Rev., 61, 306–349.
• Chen C., Westcott M., Neill K., Wichman D., Knox M., 2004. Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agron. J., 96, 1730–1738.
• Cousens R.D., Barnett A.G., Barry G.C., 2003. Dynamics of competition between wheat and oat. I. Effects of changing the timing of phenological events. Agron. J., 95, 1295–1304.
• Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A., 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.) An International Rice Research Institute Book. Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
• Haegele J.W., Becker R.J., Henninger A.S., Below F.E., 2014. Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize. Agron. J., 106, 1838–1846.
• Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Ambus P., Jensen E.S., 2001. Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops – a field study employing 32P technique. Plant Soil, 236, 63–74.
• Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Jensen E.S., 2005. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil, 274, 237–250.
• Jolliffe P.A., 2000. The replacement series. J. Ecol., 88, 371–385.
• Karpenstein-Machan M., Stuelpnagel R., 2000. Biomass yield and nitrogen fixation of legumes monocropped and intercropped with rye and rotation effects on a subsequent maize crop. Plant Soil, 218, 215–232.
• Kontturi M., Laine A., Niskanen M., Hurme T., Hyövelä M., Peltonen-Sainio P., 2011. Pea-oat intercrops to sustain lodging resistance and yield formation in northern European conditions. Acta Agr. Scand., Section B, 61, 612–621.
• Launay M., Brisson N., Satger S., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Corre-Hellou G., Kasynova E., Ruske R., Jensen E.S., Gooding M.J., 2009. Exploring options for managing strategies for pea-barley intercropping using a modeling approach. Eur. J. Agron., 31, 85–98.
• Li Q.-Z., Sun J.-H., Wei X.-J., Christie P., Zhang F.-S, Li L., 2011. Overyielding and interspecific interactions mediated by nitrogen fertilization in strip intercropping of maize with faba bean, wheat and barley. Plant Soil, 339, 147–161.
• Mao L., Zhang L., Li W., van der Werf W., Sun J., Spiertz H., Li L., 2012. Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop. Field Crops Res., 138, 11–20.
• Mead R., Willey R.W., 1980. The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Expl. Agric., 16, 217–228.
• Michalska M., Wanic M., 2008. Zmiany w obsadzie i cechach morfologicznych jęczmienia jarego i grochu siewnego pod wpływem oddziaływań konkurencyjnych [Changes in stock and morphological characteristics of spring barley and sowing peas under the influence of competition]. Fragm. Agron., 4(100), 55–70. [In Polish].
• Midmore D.J., 1993. Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crops Res., 34, 357–380.
• Musa M., Leitch M.H., Iqbal M., Sahi F.U.H., 2010. Spatial arrangement affects growth characteristics of barley-pea intercrops. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 12, 685–690.
• O’Donovan J.T., Clayton G.W., Harker K.N., Johnston A.M., Turkington T.K., Kutcher H.R., Stevenson F.C., 2005. Barley response to seed placement and herbicide timing. Can. J. Plant Sci., 85, 265–270.
• Podgórska-Lesiak M., Sobkowicz P., 2013. Prevention of pea lodging by intercropping barley with peas at different nitrogen fertilization levels. Field Crops Res., 149, 95–104.
• Rudnicki F., Wenda-Piesik A., 2007. Produkcyjność mieszanek zbóż jarych z grochem na glebie kompleksu żytniego bardzo dobrego [Productivity of pea-cereal intercrops on good rye soil complex]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 516, 181–193. [In Polish].
• Stapper M., Fischer R.A., 1990. Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 41, 1021–1041.
• Uzun A., Bilgili U., Sincik M., Filya I., Acikgoz E., 2005. Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types. Eur. J. Agron., 22, 85–94.
• Wang T.F., Gossen B.D., Slinkard A.E., 2006. Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci., 86, 855–863.
• Wanic M., Michalska M., Treder K. 2007. Konkurencja pomiędzy jęczmieniem jarym a grochem siewnym i pszenicą jarą [Competition among spring barley, field peas and spring wheat]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 516, 267–275. [In Polish].
• Wanic M., Michalska M., Myśliwiec M., 2012. Competition for nitrogen between spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato) in diversified soil conditions. Acta. Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 11(3), 95–106.
• Weiner J., Griepentrog H.-W., Kristensen L., 2001. Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. J. Appl. Ecol., 38, 784–790.
• Wenda-Piesik A., Rudnicki F., 2007. Znaczenie doboru zbóż jarych i odmian grochu do mieszanek na glebie kompleksu żytniego dobrego [The importance of pea cultivar selection for pea-cereal intercropping on good rye soil complex]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 516, 277–290. [In Polish].