PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 59 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Morphometric dimensions of the stallion sperm head depending on the staining method used

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Semen was collected from Polish Halfbred stallions. Twenty individuals from 3 to 4 years of age were selected for the study. At least one ejaculate from each stallion was collected and assessed. Sperm morphology was evaluated using Papanicolaou stain, SpermBlue®, and a complex of eosin and gentian stain, whereas unstained slides were used as control samples. Morphometric measurements were performed on 100 randomly selected sperm heads in each ejaculate. The length, width, perimeter, and surface area of the sperm head were measured. The frequency of nuclear vacuoles was determined as well. Tygerberg's strict criteria, which most precisely characterise the sperm head, were used in the morphological evaluation of the sperm. The results obtained indicate that in the case of staining with SpermBlue® and with eosin+gentian complex, the morphometry of the sperm head seems to be most similar to that observed in unstained smears. It also seems that neither shrinking nor swelling is uniform in the various staining techniques (Papanicolaou stain). Moreover, it appears that in comparison with unstained sperm, all methods caused the width of the head to increase as a result of swelling.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

59

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.263-270,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Breeding Methods and Poultry and Small Ruminant Breeding, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
autor
  • Department of Animal Genetics and Horse Breeding Institute of Bioengineering and Animal Breeding, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
  • Department of Andrology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Medical University of Lodz, 91-425 Lodz, Poland
autor
  • Department of Animal Genetics and Horse Breeding Institute of Bioengineering and Animal Breeding, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Aksoy E., Aktan T.M., Duman S., Cuce G.: Assessment of spermatozoa morphology under light microscopy with different histologic Stasin and comparison of morphometric measurements. Int J Morphol 2012, 30, 1544-1550.
  • 2. Andraszek K., Smalec E.: The use of silver nitrate for the identification of spermatozoon structure in selected mammals Can J Anim Sci 2011, 91, 239-246.
  • 3. Arruda R.P., Ball B.A., Gravance C.G., Garcia A.R., Liu I.K.M.: Effects of extenders and cryoprotectants on stallion sperm head morphology. Teriogenology 2002, 58, 253-256.
  • 4. Auger J.: Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian J Androl 2010, 12, 36-46.
  • 5. Banaszewska D., Kondracki S.: An assessment of the breeding maturity of insemination boars based on ejaculate quality changes. Folia Biol (Krakow) 2012, 60, 151-162.
  • 6. Brito L.F.C., Greene L.M., Kelleman A., Knobbe M., Turner R.: Effect of method and clinician on stallion sperm morphology evaluation. Therigenology 2011, 76, 745-750.
  • 7. Casey P.J., Gravance C.G., Davis R.O., Chabot D.D., Liu I.K.: Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology 1997, 47, 575-582.
  • 8. Dominguez L.A., Burgos M.H., Fornes M.W.: Morphometrical comparison of human spermatozoa obtained from semen and swim-up methodology. Andrologia 1999, 31, 23-26.
  • 9. Dvorakova K., Moore H.D., Sebkova N., Palecek J.: Cytoskeleton localization in the sperm head prior to fertilization. Reproduction 2005, 130, 61-69.
  • 10. El-Ghobashy A.A., West C.R.: The human sperm head: a key for successful fertilization. J Androl 2003, 24, 232-238.
  • 11. Esteso M.C., Soler A.J., Fernández-Santos M.R., Quintero- Moreno A.A., Garde J.J.: Functional Significance of the Sperm Head Morphometric Size and Shape for Determining Freezability in Iberian Red Deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) Epididymal Sperm Samples. J Androl 2006, 27, 662-670.
  • 12. Foster H.A., Abeydeera L.R. Griffin D.K., Bridger J.M.: Non- random chromosome positioning in mammalian sperm nuclei, with migration of the sex chromosomes during late spermatogenesis. J Cell Sci 2005, 118, 1811-1820.
  • 13. Franco J.G.Jr., Mauri A.L., Petersen C.G., Massaro F.C., Silva L.F., Felipe V., Cavagna M., Pontes A., Baruffi R.L., Oliveira J.B., Vagnini L.D.: Large nuclear vacuoles are indicative of abnormal chromatin packaging in human spermatozoa. Int. J Androl 2012, 35, 46-51.
  • 14. Franken D.R., Smith M., Menkveld R., Kruger T.F., Sekadde- Kigondu C., Mbizvo M., Akande E.O.: The development of a continuous quality control programme for strict sperm morphology among sub-Saharan African laboratories. Hum Reprod 2000, 15, 667-671.
  • 15. Frenau G.E., Chenoweth P.J., Ellis R., Rupp G.: Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated by two different methods. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 118, 176-181.
  • 16. Gago C., Perez-Sanchez F., Yeung C.H., Tablado L., Cooper T.G., Soler C.: Standarization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer- assisted image analysis. International Journal of Andrology 1998, 21, 169-176.
  • 17. García-Herreros M., Barón F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., Garcia-Martin L.J., Gil M.C.: Morphometric changes in boar spermatozoa induced by cryopreservation. J Androl 2007, 31, 490-498.
  • 18. Garrett C., Liu D.Y., Baker H.W.G.: Selectivity of the human sperm-zona pellucida binding process to sperm head morphometry . Fertil Steril 1997, 67, 362-371.
  • 19. Graves J.E., Higdon H.L., Boone W.R., Blackhurst D.W.: Developing techniques for determining sperm morphology in today's andrology laboratory. J Assisted Reprod and Genet 2005, 22, 219-225.
  • 20. Held J.P., Prater P., Stettler M.: Spermatozoal head defect as a cause of infertility in a stallion. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991, 199, 1760-1761.
  • 21. Henkel R., Schreiber G., Sturmhoefel A., Hipler U., Zermann D.H., Menkveld R.: Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2007, 89, 449-455.
  • 22. Hidalgo M., Rodgríguez I., Dorado J.M.: The effect of cryopreservation on sperm head morphometry in Florida male goat related to sperm freezability. Anim Repod Sci 2007, 100, 61-72.
  • 23. Johnson L.A., Hurtgen J.P.: The morphological and ultrastructural appearance of the crater defect in stallion spermatozoa. Gamete Res 1985 12, 41-46.
  • 24. Johnson L.A., Truitt-Gibert A.J.: Incidence and ultrastructure of abnormalities in porcine spermatozoa. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982, 83, 466-468.
  • 25. Kenney R., Hurtgen J., Pierson R., Witherspoon D., Simns J.: Society for Therigenology manual for clinical fertility evaluation of the stallion. Society for Theriogenology. 1983.
  • 26. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C.: The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica). Cell Mol Biol Lett 2005, 10, 3-13.
  • 27. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Iwanina M.: The effect of sperm concentration in the ejaculate on morphological traits of bull spermatozoa, Folia Biol, (Krakow) 2012, 60, 85-91.
  • 28. Kruger T.F., Ackerman S.B., Simmons K.F., Swanson R.J., Brugo S.S., Acosta A.A.: A quick, reliable staining technique for human sperm morphology. Arch Androl 1987, 18, 275-277.
  • 29. Kruger T.F., Menkveld R., Stander F.S., Lombard C.J., Van der Merwe J.P., Van Zyl J.A., Smith K.: Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986, 46, 1118-1123.
  • 30. Lasiene K., Gedrimas V., Vitkus A., Glinskyte S., Lasys V., Valanciute A., Sienkiewicz W.: Evaluation of morphological criteria of sperm quality before in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Pol J Vet Sci 2013, 16, 773-785.
  • 31. Leandri R.D., Gachet A., Pfeffer J., Celebi C., Rives N., Carre-Pigeon F., Kulski O., Mitchell V., Parinaud J.: Is intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) beneficial in the first ART cycle? a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Andrology 2013, 1, 692-697.
  • 32. Maree L., du Plessis S.S., Menkveld R., and van der Horst, G.: Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod 2010, 25, 1369-82.
  • 33. Me Alister D.A.: A comparison of motility and head morphology of sperm using different semen processing methods and three different staining techniques. Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Medical Sciences (MScMedSci-Medical Physiology) at Stellenbosch University. 2010.
  • 34. Menkveld R.: The basic semen analysis. In: Male Infertility. Diagnosis and treatment, edited by S. Oehninger and T.F. Kruger, UK: Informa Healthcare, 2007, pp. 141-170.
  • 35. Menkveld, R., Stander, F.S.H., Kotze, T.J.W., Kruger., T.F., van Zyl, J.A., 1990. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum. Reprod. 5: 586-592.
  • 36. Menkveld R., El-Garem Y., Schill W.B., Henkel R.: Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003, 20, 432-438.
  • 37. Nikolettos N., Kupker W., Demirel C., Schopper B., Blasig C., Sturm R., Felberbaum R., Bauer O., Diedrich K., Al-Hasani S.: Fertilization potential of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 14 Suppl 1999, 1, 47-70.
  • 38. Oliveira J.B., Massaro F.C., Baruffi R.L., Mauri A.L., Petersen C.G., Silva L.F., Vagnini L.D., Franco J.G.Jr.: Correlation between semen analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination and sperm DNA damage. Fertil Steril 2010, 94, 1937-1940.
  • 39. Park Y.S., Park S., Ko D.S., Park D.W., Seo J.T., Yang K.M.: Observation of sperm-head vacuoles and sperm morphology under light microscope. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2014, 41, 132-136.
  • 40. Prisant N., Escalier D., Soufir J.C., Morillon M., Schoevaert D., Misrahi M., Tachdjian G.: Ultrastructural nuclear defects and increased chromosome aneuploidies in spermatozoa with elongated heads. Hum Reprod 2007, 22, 1052-1059.
  • 41. Rubio-Guillén J., Gonzalez D., Garde J.J., Esteso M.C., Fernández-Santos M.R., Rodriguez-Gil J.E., Madrid-Bury N., Quintero-Moreno A.: Effects of cryopreservation on bull spermatozoa distribution in morphometrically distinct subpopulations. Reprod Dornest Anim 2007, 42, 354-357.
  • 42. Said T.M., Agarwal A., Sharma R.K., Thomas A.J., Sikka S.C.: Impact of sperm morphology on DNA damage caused by oxidative stress inducted by beta-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. Feril Steril 2005, 83, 95-103.
  • 43. Sancho M., Pérez-Sánchez F., Tablado L., de Monserrat J.J., Soler C.: Computer assisted morphometric analysis of ram sperm heads: evaluation of different fixative techniques. Theriogenologx 1998, 50, 27-37.
  • 44. Singh S., Sharma S., Jain M., Chauhan R.: Importance of Papanicolaou Staining for Sperm Morphologic Analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 2011, 136, 247-251.
  • 45. Thompson L.A., Brook P.F., Warren M.A., Barratt C.L.R., Cooke I.D.: A morphometric comparison if the nuclear morphology of fresh and frozen-thawed human zona-bound and unbound sperm. J Androl 1994, 15, 337-342.
  • 46. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V.: Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl 2001, 22, 382-394.
  • 47. Vaissaire J.P.: Sexualité et reproduction des mammiferes domestiques et de laboratoire. Maloine-S.A. Ed., Paris, 1977.
  • 48. Van der Horst G., Maree L.: SpermBlue ®: A new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis. Biotech Histochem 2009, 84, 299-308.
  • 49. Vanderzwalmen P., Hiemer A., Rubner P., Bach M., Never A., Stacher A.: Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 2008, 17, 617-627.
  • 50. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO Press, 2010.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-c273ce7f-b5f7-4ce0-9c69-f94859f3bd4f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.