The efficiency of executing technical actions in volleyball and the teams’ gender and sports level

• Autorzy: Cieminski K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. Modern statistical methods related to team games can be very helpful in improving the quality of analysis. Aim of Study. The aim of the paper was to identify differences in the efficiency of executing technical actions by teams participating in the Men’s and Women’s European Volleyball Championship in 2013-2017, with consideration for the gender and the place taken in the final classification. Material and Methods. The research material consisted of teams (n = 96) divided into five groups: 1 – places 1-4, 2 – places 5-8, 3 – places 9-12, 4 – places 13-16, 5 – all teams. The results of efficiency in the serve, reception, setting the reception, the attack and the block were analysed. Results. Female teams were more efficient than the male ones in reception by 4.45% (p < 0.05) and in the block by 0.32 point (p < 0.05), while the male teams were better than the female ones in setting by 10.24% (p < 0.001) and in the attack by 7.46% (p < 0.001). Female teams from places 1-4 were more efficient in the serve by 0.44 point (p < 0.01), in setting by 13.93% (p < 0.001), in the attack by 9.00% (p < 0.001) and in the block by 1.00 point (p < 0.01) in comparison with teams from places 13-16. Similar results were obtained by men: in the serve by 0.44 point (p < 0.01), in setting by 13.93% (p < 0.001), in the attack by 9.00% (p < 0.001) and in the block by 1.00 point (p < 0.01). Conclusions. The obtained results indicate differences between male and female volleyball players. This necessitates using different methods of training. The efficiency of performing technical actions differentiates between teams from places 1-4 and 13-16. Therefore, in training control, coaches should primarily focus on tools that allow an assessment of the efficiency of male and female players in individual technical elements.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.159-165,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Cieminski K.

• Department of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport in Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bergeles N, Barzouka K, Elissavet M. Performance of male and female setters and attackers on Olympic-level volleyball teams. Int J Perf Anal Sport. 2009; 9: 141-148.
• 2. Borrie A, Jonsson G, Magnusson M. Temporal pattern analysis and its applicability in sport: an explanation and exemplar data. J Sports Sci. 2002; 20: 845-852.
• 3. Bozhkova A. Playing efficiency of the best volleyball players in the world. Res Kinesiol. 2013; 41: 92-95.
• 4. Buscà B, Febrer J. Temporal fight between the middle blocker and the setter in high level volleyball. Int J Med Sci Phys Act Sport. 2012; 12, 313-327.
• 5. Castro J, Mesquita I. Analysis of the Attack Tempo Determinants in Volleyball’s Complex II – a Study on Elite Male Teams. Int J Perf Anal Sport. 2010; 10: 197-206.
• 6. CEV Volleyball European Championship. Retrieved January 25, 2018, from: http://www.cev.lu/CompetitionArea/competition.aspx?ID=700&PID=-2.
• 7. Ciemiński K. The efficiency of executing technical actions by female volleyball players depending on their positions on the court. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2017; 9(3): 44-52.
• 8. Drikos S, Kountouris P, Laios A, Laios Y. Correlates of team performance in volleyball. Int J Perf Anal Sport. 2009; 9(2): 149-156.
• 9. Durkovic T, Marelic N, Resetar T. Influence of position of players in rotation on differences between winning and losing teams in volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2008; 8, 8-15.
• 10. F.I.V.B. Official volleyball rules. 35th FIVB World Congress held in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 2016.
• 11. Gabbett T, Georieff B. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of Australian Junior National, state, and novice volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21: 902-908.
• 12. Inkinen V, Häyrinen M, Linnamo V. Technical and tactical analysis of women’s volleyball. Biomed Hum Kinetics. 2013; 5: 43-50.
• 13. João P, Leite N, Mesquita I, Sampaio J. Sex differences in discriminative power of volleyball game-related statistics. Percept Motor Skill. 2010; 111(3): 893-900.
• 14. Palao J, Manzanares P, Ortega E. Techniques used and efficacy of volleyball skills in relation to gender. Int J Perf Anal Sport. 2009; 9(2): 281-293.
• 15. Palao J, Santos A, Ureña A. Effect of team level on skill performance in volleyball. Int J Perf Anal Sport. 2004; 4(2): 50-60.
• 16. Patsiaouras A, Moustakidis A, Charitonidis K, Kokaridas D. Volleyball technical skills as winning and qualification factors during the Olympic Games 2008. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2010; 10: 115-120.
• 17. Peña J, Rodríguez-Guerra, J, Serra N. Which skills and factors better predict winning and losing in high-level men’s volleyball. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 27(9): 2487-2493.
• 18. Quiroga M, Garcia-Manso J, Rodriguez-Ruiz D, Sarmiento S, De Saa Y, Moreno P. Relation between InGame Role and Service Characteristics in Elite Women’s Volleyball. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24: 2316-2321.
• 19. Salci Y, Kentel B, Heycan C, Akin S, Korkusuz F. Comparison of landing maneuvers between male and female college volleyball players. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19(6): 622-628.
• 20. Sampaio J, Ibanez S. Discriminative power of basketball game-related statistics by level of competition and sex. Percept Motor Skill. 2004; 99: 1231-1238.
• 21. Wnorowski K, Ciemiński K. Volleyball players’ somatic composition in the light of sports results at 2014 FIVB Volleyball Men’s World Championship. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2016; 8: 24-31.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23829/TSS.2018.25.3-6