PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2016 | 76 |

Tytuł artykułu

Comparison of soil CO2 efflux rates in Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and P. rigitaeda plantations in southern Korea

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
This study compared soil CO2 efflux rates in three adjacent coniferous plantations consisting of larch (Larix leptolepis Gordon), red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) and rigitaeda pine (P. rigitaeda: P. rigida Mill × P. taeda L.) species planted in the same year (1963). Soil CO2 efflux, litter fall carbon (C) and root decomposition rates were measured with soil environmental factors for two years. The mean annual soil CO2 efflux rates (g CO2 m−2 hour−1) were the highest in rigitaeda pine (0.30), followed by red pine (0.27) and larch (0.24) plantations. An exponential regression of the CO2 efflux rates against their corresponding soil temperatures showed a significant (P < 0.05) relationship (red pine R2 = 0.69; rigitaeda pine R2 = 0.67; larch R2 = 0.63). The soil CO2 efflux rates were negatively correlated with soil pH, but the soil water and soil organic C content were not significantly correlated with the CO2 efflux rates. Soil CO2-C efflux rates were correlated by litter fall C inputs in the larch and red pine plantations, and the decomposition rates of 5–10 mm diameter roots in the larch plantation. This result is useful in understanding potential responses of soil CO2 efflux rates with changes in stand and soil environmental factors induced by different tree species.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

76

Opis fizyczny

p.51-60,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Korea
autor
  • Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia

Bibliografia

  • Binkley D (2008) Three key points in the design of forest experiments. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 2022–2023.
  • Bond-Lamberty B, Bronson D, Bladyka E & Gower ST (2011) A comparison of trenched plot techniques for partitioning soil respiration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 2108–2114.
  • Borken W, Xu YJ, Davidson EA & Beese F (2002) Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine forests. Global Change Biology 8: 1205–1216.
  • Bowden RD, Davidson E, Savage K, Arabia C & Steudler P (2004) Chronic nitrogen additions reduce total soil respiration and microbial respiration in temperate forest soils at the Harvard Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 196: 43–56.
  • Bréchet L, Ponton S, Roy J, Freycon V, Coûteaux MM, Bonal D & Epron D (2009) Do tree species characteristics influence soil respiration in tropical forests; A test based on 16 tree species planted in monospecific plots. Plant and Soil 319: 235–246.
  • Buchmann N (2000) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 32: 1625–1635.
  • Davidson EA, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackermani IL & Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48: 53–69.
  • Davidson EA & Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440: 165–173.
  • Dijkstra FA, West JB, Hobbie SE & Reich PB (2009) Antagonistic effects of species on C respiration and net N mineralization in soils from mixed coniferous plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1112–1118.
  • Fox TR (2000) Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 138: 187–202.
  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.
  • Jeong J & Kim C (2014) Carbon and nitrogen status of decomposing roots in three adjacent coniferous plantations. Annual of Forest Research 57: 109–117.
  • Kim C, Son Y, Lee WK, Jeong J & Noh NJ (2009) Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1420–1426.
  • Kim C, Jeong J, Cho HS & Son Y (2010) Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations. Journal of Plant Research 123: 403–409.
  • Kim C, An HC, Cho HS & Choo GC (2013) Base cation fluxes and release by needle litter in three adjacent coniferous plantations. Forest Science and Technology 9: 225–228.
  • Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S & Liu WC (2011) Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Animal Behaviour 61: 1029–1033.
  • Lee KH & Jose S (2003) Soil respiration, fine root respiration, fine root production, and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 185: 263–273.
  • Lee N, Koo JW, Noh NJ, Kim J & Son Y (2010) Autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration in needle fir and Quercus-dominated stands in a cool-temperate forest, central Korea. Journal of Plant Research 123: 485–495.
  • Metcalfe DB, Meir P, Aragaŏ LEOC, Malhi Y, da Costa ACL, Braga A, Goncalves PHL, de Athaydes J, de Almeida SS & Williams M (2007) Factors controlling spatio-temporal variation in carbon dioxide efflux from surface litter, roots, and soil organic matter at four rain forest sites in the eastern Amazon. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: G04001.
  • Metcalfe DB, Fisher RA & Wardle DA (2011) Plant communities as drivers of soil respiration: pathways, mechanisms, and significance for global change. Biogeosciences 8: 2047–2061.
  • Noh NJ, Son Y, Lee SK, Yoon TK, Seo KW, Kim C, Lee WK, Bae SW & Hwang J (2010) Influence of stand density on soil CO2 efflux for a Pinus densiflora forest in Korea. Journal of Plant Research 123: 411–419.
  • Oksanen L (2001) Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94: 27–38.
  • Olsson BA, Hansson K, Persson T, Beuker E & Helmisaari HS (2012) Heterotrophic respiration and nitrogen mineralisation in soils of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch stands in contrasting climates. Forest Ecology and Management 269: 197–205.
  • Pangle RE & Seiler J (2002) Influence of seedling roots, environmental factors and soil characteristics on soil CO2 efflux rates in a 2-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation in the Virginia Piedmont. Environmental Pollution 116: 85–96.
  • Raich JW & Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B: 81–99.
  • Raich JW & Tufekcioglu A (2000) Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry 48: 71–90.
  • Reth S, Reichstein M & Falge E (2005) The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux- A modified model. Plant and Soil 268: 21–33.
  • SAS Institute Inc (2003) SAS/STAT statistical software. version 9.1. SAS publishing, Cary, NC. USA.
  • Silver WL & Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129: 407–419.
  • Søe ARB & Buchmann N (2005) Spatial and temporal variations in soil respiration in relation to stand structure and soil parameters in an unmanaged beech forest. Tree Physiology 25: 1427–1436.
  • Tang J, Qi Y, Xu M, Misson L & Goldstein AH (2005) Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa plantation in the Sierra Nevada. Tree Physiology 25: 57–66.
  • Valverde-Barrantes OJ (2007) Relationships among litterfall, fine root growth, and soil respiration for five tropical tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 1954–1965.
  • Vesterdal L, Elberling B, Christiansen JR, Callesen I & Schmidt IK (2012) Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 264: 185–196.
  • Yan J, Wang Y, Zhou G & Zhang D (2006) Estimates of soil respiration and net primary production of three forests at different succession stages in South China. Global Change Biology 12: 810–821.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-bdf65a26-28d8-4ebc-a47d-b2bdc55015cb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.