PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 31 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Dietary effect of supplementation with amaranth meal on growth performance and apparent digestibility of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus myskiss

Warianty tytułu

PL
Wpływ suplementacji mąki z szarłatu na wzrost i strawność pozorną pstrąga tęczowego Oncorhynchus myskiss

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of the this study was the to assessment of use the amaranth meal in feed for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Two experimental feeds contained 5.0% and 10.0% of amaranth meal were prepared and compared to reference diet (commercial feed) containing similar amountsof specific nutrients. Initial body wet weight of experimental trout was 524.8±28.5 g and mean lengthof 35.2±0.6 cm. Feed was offered in ration between 0.50–1.71% of fish biomass (calculated by software) of respective group for 21 days. The validation of chromic method to analyze digestibility of fish diet components was done and the linear regression formula Y= 0.0142X+ 0.075 was determined for chromium oxide (VI) concentration. Significant differences (p<0.05) in crude proteinand Nitrogen Free Extract digestibility were found between the experimental groups and the reference one. The present results indicated the feasibility of using of amaranth flour as plant component in feeding of rainbow trout
PL
Celem pracy było zastosowanie mąki z szarłatu (Amaranthus cruentus) w żywieniu pstrąga tęczowego Oncorhynchus mykiss. Przygotowano dwie eksperymentalne pasze z dodatkiem mąkiz amarantusa na poziomie (5 i 10%) i jako referencyjną zastosowano paszę komercyjną o podobnej zawartości składników pokarmowych. Badania przeprowadzono na rybach o średniej masie 524,8±28,5 g i długości 35,2±0,6 cm. Doświadczenie trwało 21 dni, podczas których ryby karmiono paszą w dawkach 0,5–1,7% całkowitej biomasy wyliczanej przez hodowlany program komputerowy. Na potrzeby określenia strawności pozornej przygotowanych pasz wykonano walidację metody chromowej dla koncentracji tlenku chromu (VI), otrzymując krzywą korelacji o wzorze Y=0.0142X+0.075. Różnice istotne statystyczne (p<0,05) zaobserwowano w strawności białka surowego i bezazotowych związków wyciągowych w grupach eksperymentalnych w stosunku do grupy referencyjnej. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują na możliwość zastosowania mąki z szarłatu w żywieniu pstrąga tęczowego

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

31

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.459-469,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Fish Biology and Pisciculture, , Univeristy of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Michala Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Ichthyology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
  • Department of Fish Biology and Pisciculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Fish Biology and Pisciculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Fish Biology and Pisciculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

  • AOAC. 2000.Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • AUSTRENG E. 1978.Digestibility determination in fish using chromic oxide marking and analysisof contents from different segments of the gastrointestinal tract.Aquaculture, 13: 265–272.
  • AUSTRENG E., STOREBAKKEN T., THOMASSEN M.S., REFSTIE S., THOMASSEN Y. 2000.Evaluation of selectedtrivalent metal oxides as inert markers used to estimate apparent digestibility in salmonids.Aquaculture, 188: 65–78.
  • BARNHAM C., BAXTER A. 1998.Condition Factor, K, for Salmonid Fish. Fish. Note: 1–3.
  • BÓRQUEZ A.S., HERNÁDEZ A.J., DANTAGNAN P. 2011.Incorporation of whole lupin, Lupinus albus, seedmeal in commercial extruded diets for rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss: effect on growthper formance, nutrient digestibility, and muscle fatty acid composition. J Aqua. Soc., 42(2):209–221.
  • BRAUGE C., MEDALE F., CORRAZE G. 1994. Effect of dietary carbohydrate levels on growth, bodycomposition and glycaemia in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, reared in seawater. Aquaculture, 123: 109–120.
  • BUREL C., BOUJARD T., TULLI F., KAUSHIK S. 2000.Digestibility of extruded peas, extruded lupin, andrapeseed meal in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and turbot (Psetta maxima).Aquaculture,188: 285–298.
  • CABALLERO M.J., OBACH A., ROSENLUND G., MONTERO D., GISVOLD M., IZQUIERDO M.S. 2002.Impactof different dietary lipid sources on growth, lipid digestibility, tissue fatty acid composition andhistology of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture, 214: 253–271
  • CARTER C.G., HAULER R.C. 2000.Fish meal replacement by plant meals in extruded feeds for atlanticsalmon, Salmo salar L. Aquaculture, 185: 299–311.
  • COLLINS S.A., DESAI A.R., MANSFIELD G.S., HILL J.E., VanKESSEL A.G., DREW M.D. 2012.The effect of increasing inclusion rates of soybean, pea and canola meals and their protein concentrates on the growth of rainbow trout: Concepts in diet formulation and experimental design for ingredient evaluation.Aquaculture, 344–349: 90–99.
  • DEUTSCH L., GRA ̈SLUND S., FOLKE C., TROELL M., HUITRIC M., KAUTSKY N., LEBEL L. 2007.Feedingaquaculture growth through globalization: Exploitation of marine ecosystems for fishmeal. Glob.Envi. Chan., 17: 238–249.
  • ESCAFFRE A.M., KAUSHIK S., MAMBRINI M. 2007.Morphometric evaluation of changes in the digestivetract of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) due to fish meal replacement with soy protein concentrate. Aquaculture, 273: 127–138.
  • ESCUDERO N.L., DEARELLANO M.L., LUCO J.M., GIMÉNEZ M.S., MUCCIARELLI S.I. 2004.Comparison of the chemical composition and nutritional value of Amaranthus cruentus flour and its protein concentrate. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 59: 15–21.
  • FISHSTAT PLUS, 2016.Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series, version 2.3.2000.
  • FAO Fisheries Department, Fisheries Informations, Data and Statistics Unit.
  • FURUKAWA A., TSUKAHARA H., 1966. On the acid digestion method for the determination of chromicoxide as an index substance in the study of digestibility of fish feed. Bull. Jap. Soc. Fish., 32:502–506.
  • GLENCROSS B.D., BOOTH M., ALLAN G.L. 2007. A feed is only as good as its ingredients. A review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aqua. Nutr., 13: 17–34.
  • GOMES E.F., REMA P., KAUSHIK S.J. 1995. Replacement of fish meal by plant proteins in the diet of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): digestability and growth performance. Aquaculture,130: 177–186.
  • GOMUŁKA P., WŁASOW T., SZCZEPKOWSKI M., MISIEWICZ L., ZIOMEK E. 2014.The effect of propofolanesthesia on hematological and biochemical blood profile of European whitefish. Tur. J. Fish.Aqua. Sci., 14: 331–337.
  • GRISDALE-HELLAND B., HELLANDS .J. 1997. Replacement of protein by fat and carbohydrate in diets foratlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at the end of the freshwater stage. Aquaculture, 152: 167–180.
  • HOSENEY R. (1994).Principles of cereal science and technology. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: AmericanAssociation of Cereal Chemists Inc.
  • KAUSHIK S.J., CRAVEDI J.P., LALLES J.P., SUMPTER J., FAUCONNEAU B., LAROCHE M. 1995. Partial or totalreplacement of fish meal by soybean protein on growth, protein utilization, potential estrogenic orantigenic effects, cholesterolemia and flesh quality in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss.Aquaculture, 133: 257–274.
  • KROGDAHL A., LEA T.B., OLLI J.L. 1994. Soybean protein’s inhibitors affect intestinal trypsin activitiesand amino acid digestibility’s in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,A 107: 215–219.
  • MAYNARD L.A., LOOSLI J.K., HINTZ H.F. WARNER R.K. 1979.Animal nutrtion. McGraw-Hill Book Co.,New York, U.S.A. IX, pp. 602.
  • NAYLOR R.L., GOLDBURG R.J., PRIMAVERA J.H., KAUTSKY N., BEVERIDGE M.C.M., CLAY J., FOLKE C., LUBCHENCO J., MOONEY H., TROELL M. 2000.Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.
  • NRC. 2011. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  • OLSEN R.E., MYKLEBUSTR., RINGØE., MAYHEWT.M. 2000.The influences of dietary linseed oil andsaturated fatty acids on caecal enterocytes in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). A quantitativeultrastructural study. Fish Physiol. Biochem., 22: 207–216.
  • OURAJI H., ZARETABAR A., RAHMANI H. 2013.Performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)fingerlings fed diets containing different levels of faba bean (Vicia faba) meal.Aquaculture,416–417: 161–165.
  • ØVERLAND H., SØRENSEN M., STOREBAKKEN T., PENN M., KROGDAHL Å., SKREDE A. 2009.Pea proteinconcentrate substituting fish meal or soybean meal in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass composition, gut health, and physicalfeed quality. Aquaculture, 288: 305–311.
  • PEDERSEN B., KALINOUSL.S., EGGUMB.O. 1987.The nutritive value of amaranth grain (Amaranthuscaudatus) I. Protein and minerals of raw and processed grain (Qualitas plantarum). Plant FoodHum. Nutr., 36: 309–324.
  • POCZYCZYŃSKI P., GOMUŁKA P., WOŹNIAK M., SZOSTAK I. 2014. Preliminary study on the partial substitution of fish oil with amaranth oil in diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Effects on body composition and fatty acids content.Tur. J. Fish. Aqua. Sci., 14: 457–462.
  • REFSTIE S., KORSØEN Ø.J., STOREBAKKEN T., BAEVERFJORD G., LEIN I., ROEM A.J. 2000.Differing nutritional responses to dietary soybean meal in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Atlanticsalmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 190: 349.
  • STOREBAKKEN T., AUSTRENG E. 1987. Ration levels for SalmonidsII. Growth, feed intake, proteindigestibility, body composition, and feed conversion in rainbow trout weighing 0.5–1.0 kg. Aquaculture, 60: 207–221.
  • SUGIURA S.H., BABBIT J.K., DONG F.M., HARDY R.W. 2000. Utilization of fish and animal by-productmeals in low-pollution feeds for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Aquac. Res., 31:585–593.
  • THIESSEN D.L., CAMPBELL G.L., ADELIZI P.D. 2003.Digestibility and growth performance of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed with pea and canola products. Aqua. Nutr., 9: 67–75.
  • TIAN L.X., LIU Y.J., YANG H.J., LIANG G.Y., NIU J. 2012.Effects of different dietary wheat starch levelson growth, feed efficiency and digestibility in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aqua. Int., 20:283–293.
  • WALTON M.J. 1986.Metabolic effects of feeding a high protein/low carbohydrate diet as compared toa low protein/high carbohydrate diet to rainbow trout Salmo gairdnerii. Fish Physiol. Biochem.,1(1): 7–15.
  • WINDELL J.T., FOLTZ J.W., SAROKAN J.A. 1978.Methods of fecal collection and nutrient leaching indigestibility studies. Progressive Fish Culturist, 49: 51–55.
  • WŁASOW T., GOMUŁKA P., POJMAŃSKA T. 1997. Interesting case of pathological changes in rainbow trout Oncorynchus mykiss (Walbaum) probably caused by myxosporea. Acta Ichthy. Pisc., 27: 155–163.
  • VILHELMSSON O.T., MARTIN S.A.M., MÉDALE F., KAUSHIK S.J., HOULIHAN D.F. 2004.Dietary plant-protein substitution affects hepatic metabolism in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BritishJ. Nutr., 92: 71–80.
  • VIRK P., SAXENA P.K. 2003. Potential of Amaranthus seeds supplementary feed and its impact on growth in some carps. Bioresource Technology, 86: 25–27.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-b0596f55-afab-467d-9bf3-96f090e74e69
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.