The role of animal feeding trials for the nutritional and safety assessment of feeds from genetically modified plants - Present stage and future challenges

• Autorzy: Flachowsky G. , Wenk C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The world´s population is still growing up and asking for more and better food. High yielding plants with low external inputs should be the main aim of plant breeding to meet the higher demand for man and animal. Apart from traditional breeding plant biotechnology seems to have a certain potential to contribute to this objective. Safety and nutritional studies with such modified plants are the most important prerequisites for public acceptance of derived feed and food. The first step for safety and nutritional assessment of modified plants is the compositional analysis of potential food/feed and including the newly expressed proteins and other new constituents and the comparison with conventional counterparts. In vitro studies and experiments with laboratory animals are the next steps for assessments. Feeding studies with target animals are of special concern for nutritional assessment and are considered in more detail in the present paper.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

animal feeding; safety assessment; nutritive assessment; feed; genetically modified organism; transgenic plant; present; future; digestibility; in vitro; laboratory animal

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.149-170,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Flachowsky G.

• Federal Research Institute of Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany

autor

Wenk C.

Bibliografia

• Afssa (Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Aliments), 2010. AVIS de affsa sur l’étude de Velimirow et al., « effets biologiques de la consommation du mais transgenique NK603xMON810 dans des études de reproduction a long terme chez la souris ». Maisons-Alfort, 12.03.209 ; Saisine n 2008-SA-0361, pp. 5
• Alexander T.W., Reuter T., Aulrich K., Sharma R., Okine E.K., Dixon W.T., McAllister T.A., 2007. A review of the detection and fate of novel plant molecules derived from biotechnology in livestock production. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 133, 31-62
• Aumaitre A., Aulrich K., Chesson A., Flachowsky G., Piva G., 2002: New feeds from genetically modified plants: Substantial equivalence , nutritional equivalence, digestibility, and safety for animals and the food chain. Livest. Prod. Sci. 74, 223-238
• Baldwin R.L., 1995. Modelling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London (UK)
• BEETLE, 2009. Long-term effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on health and the environment (including biodiversity). Executive Summary and Main Report. Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, pp. 132 + 6 Annexes Brake D.E., Evenson D.P., 2004. A generational study of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans on mouse fetal, postnatal and adult testicular development. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 29-36
• Brake D.G., Thaler R., Evenson D.P., 2004. Evaluation of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize on mouse testicular development by dual parameter flow cytometry. J. Agr. Food Chem. 52, 2097-2102
• Brookes G., Barfoot P., 2008. GMcrop: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996- 2006. PG Economics Ltd., Dorchester (UK), pp. 118
• CAST, 2006. Safety of Meat, Milk, and Eggs from Animals fed Crops Derived from ModernBiotechnology. No 34, pp.8
• Cellini F., Chesson A., Coquhonn I., Constable A., Davies H.V., Engel K.-H., Gatehouse A.M.R., Kärenlampi S., Kok E.J., Legnay J.J., Lehesranta S., Noteborn H.P.J.M., Pedersen J., Smith M., 2004. Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 1089-1123
• Clark J.H., Ipharraguerre I.R., 2001. Livestock performance: Feeding biotech crops. J. Dairy Sci. 84, E Suppl., E9-E18, 237-249
• DBT (Department Biotechnology), 2008. Protocols for Food and Feed Safety Assessment of GE Crops. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, pp. 34
• De Vendomois J.S., Roullier F., Cellier D., Seralini G.-E., 2009. A comparison of te effects of three GM corn varieties om mammalian health. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 5, 706-726
• Dona A., Arvanitoyannis I.S., 2009. Health risks of genetically modified foods. Ritcal Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 49, 164-175
• Doull J., Gaylor D., Greim H.A., Lovell D.P., Lynch B., Munro I.C., 2007. Report of an Expert Panel on the reanalysis of Seralini et al., (2007) of a 90-day study conducted by Monsanto in support of the safety of a genetically modified corn variety (MON 863). Food Chem. Toxicol. 45, 2073-2085
• EFSA, 2006. Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J. 99, 1-100
• EFSA, 2007. Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events. EFSA J. 512, 1-5
• EFSA, 2008. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plant derived food and feed. The role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 2-70
• EFSA, 2009. GMO Panel deliberations on the Austrian report “Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603 x MON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice”. Adopted at the 47th Plenary Meeting, Parma, 28-29 January 2009, p. 1
• Ewen S.W.B., Pusztai A., 1999. Effects of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet, 354. 1353-1354
• FAO, 2009. The state of food and agriculture – Livestock in the balance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 180
• Flachowsky G. (Editor), 2006. Possibilities of decontamination of “Undesirable substances of Annex 5 of the Feed Law (2006)” (in German), Landbauforsch. Völkenrode – FAL Agr. Res., Special Issue 294, pp. 290
• Flachowsky G., 2008. What do animal nutritionists expect from plant breeding? Outlook Agr. 37, 95-103
• Flachowsky G., 2010. Global food security: Is there any solution? (in German). NovoArgumente 105-3-4, 64-68
• Flachowsky G., Aulrich K., 2001. Nutritional assessment of GMO in animal nutrition. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10, Suppl. 1, 181-194
• Flachowsky G., Aulrich K., Böhme H., Halle I., 2007. Studies on feeds from genetically modified plants (GMP) Contributions to nutritional and safety assessment. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 133, 2-30
• Flachowsky G., Böhme H., 2005. Proposals for nutritional assessments of feed from genetically modified plants. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 14, 49-70
• Flachowsky G., Brade W., 2007. Potentials to reduce methane emissions in ruminants (in German). Züchtungskunde 79, 417-365
• Flachowsky G., Chesson A., Aulrich K., 2005a. Animal nutritional with feeds from genetically modified plants. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59, 1-40
• Flachowsky G., Dänicke S., 2005. From feed to safe food – Contributions of animal nutrition to the safety of food. In: A.P. Riley (Editor). New Developments in Food Policy, Control and Research. Nova Science Publ. Inc., pp. 65-95
• Flachowsky G., Halle I., Aulrich K., 2005b. Long term feeding of Bt-corn - a ten generation study with quails. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59, 449-451
• FSANS, 2007. The role of animal feeding studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified foods. Report of Workshop of Food Standards. Australia, New Zealand, 15th June 2007, Canberra, p. 19
• Gürtler P., Paul V., Steinke K., Preisinger W., Wiedemann S., Albrecht C., Spiekers H., Schwarz F., Meyer H.H.D., 2009. Investigations on the potential transfer of recombinant DNA and Cry1Ab protein from feed into milk, blood, feces and urine of cows fed genetically modified maize. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 18, 111 (Abstr.)
• Hemre G.-I., Sanden M., Bakke-McKellep A.M., Sagstad A., Krogdahl A., 2005. Growth, feed utilization and health of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. fed genetically modified compared to non-modified commercial hybrid soybeans. Aqucult. Nutr. 11, 157-167
• Howe J.A., Tanumihardjo S.A., 2006. Cartenoid-biofortified maize maintains adequate vitamin A status in Mongolian gerbils. J. Nutr. 136, 2562-2567
• ILSI, 2003a. Best practices for the conduct of animal studies to evaluate crops genetically modified for input traits. International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, p. 62 http//www.ilsi.org/ file/bestpracticescas.pdf.
• ILSI, 2003b. Crop Compositional Database. Accessed 200 ILSI, 2007. Best practices for the conduct of animal studies to evaluate crops genetically modified for output traits. Int. Life Sci. Inst., Washington, DC
• Jackson A.A., 2007. Protein. In: J. Mann and S. Truswell (Editors). Essential in Human Nutrition. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press, pp. 53-72
• James C., 2009. Global status of commercialised transgenic crops: 2009. ISAAA. Ithaca, NY, http://www.isaaa.org..
• Kebreab E., Clark K., Wagner-Riddle K., France J., 2006. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian agriculture. A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 135-158
• Keyzer M.A., Merbis M.D., Pavel L.F.P.W., van Wesenbeck C.F.A., 2005. Diets shifts towards meat and the effect on cereal use: Can we feed the animals in 2030. Ecol. Econ. 55, 187-202
• Kilic A., Akay M.T., 2008. A three generation study with genetically modified Bt corn in rats: Biochemical and histopathological investigation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 1164-1170
• Kok E., Kuiper H., 2003. Comperative safety assessment of biotech crops. Trends Biotech. 21, 439-444
• Kok E.J., Keijer J., Kleter G.A., Kuiper H.A., 2008. Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived feeds. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 50, 98-113
• Malatesta M., Caporaloni C., Gavaudan S., Rocchi M., Serafini S., Tiberi C., Gazzanelli G., 2002. Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analyses of hepatocyte nucleus from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Cell Struct. Funct. 2, 173-180
• Malatesta M., Caporaloni C., Rossi L., Battistelli S., Rocchi M., Tonucci F., 2003. Malatesta M., Caporaloni C., Rossi L., Battistelli S., Rocchi M., Tonucci F., 2003. Ultrastructural analysis of pancreatic acinar cells from mice fed on genetically modified soybans. J. Anat. 201, 409-415
• McNaughton I.L., Roberts M., Rice D., Smith B., Hinds M., Schmidt J., Locke M., Bryant A., Rood T., Layton R., Lamb I., Pelaney B., 2007. Feeding performance of broiler chickens fed diets containing DAS-59122-7 maize grain compared to diets containing nontransgenic maize grain. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 132, 227-239
• Munkvold G.P., Hellmich R.L., Rice L.G., 1999. Comparison of Fumonisin concentrations in kernels of transgenic Bt-maize hybrids and nontransgenic hybrids. Plant Dis. 83, 130-138
• Niemann H., Kues W., 2007. Transgenic farm animals: An update. Reprod. Fert. Develop. 19, 762-770
• Nordlee J.A., Taylor S.L., Townsend J.A., Thomas L.A., Bush R.K., 1996. Identification of a Brasil nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 688-692
• OECD, 1993. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology. Concepts and principles, OECD Paris (France)
• OECD, 1995. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. OECD Cons. Meeting, 02./03November 1995, Rome; OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2001a. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds No. 1. Consensus document on key nutrients and key toxicants in low erucic acid rapeseed (canola). OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2001. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds No. 2: Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of soybean: Key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2002a. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds No. 3: Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of sugar beet: Key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2002b. Series on the Safety of Novel Food and feed No. 4. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of potatoes: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients and toxicants. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2002c. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds No. 5: Consensus document on compositional for new varieties of maize (Zea mays): Key food and feed nutrients and antinutrients and secondary metabolites. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2003. Series on the Safety of Novel Food and feed No. 7. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum): Key Food and Feed Nutrients, Anti-Nutrients and Toxicants. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2004a. Series on the Safety of Novel Food and feed No. 10. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Rice (Oryza sativa): Key Food and Feed Nutrients and Anti-Nutrients. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2004b. Series on the Safety of Novel food and feed No. 11. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense): Key Food and Feed Nutrients and Anti-Nutrients. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2004c. Series on the Safety of Novel Food and feed No. 12. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): Key Food and Feed Nutrients and Anti-nutrients. OECD, Paris (France)
• OECD, 2005. Series on the Safety of Novel Food and feed No. 13. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Alfalfa and other Temperate Forage Legumes: Key Feed Nutrients, Anti-nutrients and Secondary Plant Metabolites. OECD, Paris (France)
• Poulsen M., Kroghsbo S., Schroder M., Wilcks A., Jacobsen H., Miller A., Frenzel T., Danier J., Rychlik M., Shu Q., Emami K., Sudhakar D., Gatehouse A., Engel K.H., Knudsen I., 2007a. A 90-day safety study in Wistar rats fed genetically modified rice expressing snowdrop lectin Galanthus nivalis (GNA). Food Chem. Toxicol. 45, 350-363
• Poulsen M., Schroder M., Wilcks A., Kroghsbo S., Lindecrona R.H., Miller A., Frenzel T., Danier J., Richlik M., Shu Q., Emami K., Taylor M., Gatehouse A., Engel K.H., Knudsen I., 2007b. Safety testing of GM-rice expressing PHA-E lectin using a new animal test design. Food Chem. Toxicol. 45, 364-377
• Rand W.M., Pellett P.L., Young V.R., 2003. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 109-127
• Rhee G.S., Cho D.H., Won Y.H., Soek J.H., Kim S.S., Kwack S.J., Lee R.D., Chae S.Y., Kim J.W., Lee B.M., Park K.L., Choi K.S., 2005. Multigeneration reproductive and developmental toxicity study of bar gene inserted intogenetically modified potato on rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 68, 2263-2276
• Robi J.M., Wang P., Kasinathan P., Kuroiwa P., 2007. Transgenic animal production and biotechnology. Theriogenology 67, 127-133
• SCAR (EU Commission – Standing Committee on Agricultural Research, 2008. New challenges for agricultural research. Climate change, rural development, agricultural knowledge systems. The 2nd SCAR Foresight Exercise, Brussels, December 2008, pp. 112
• Scholtz N., Müller U., Halle I., Flachowsky G., Sauerwein H., 2008. Metabolic and histological traits in quails fed with either transgenic (Bt) or with isogenic maize for several generations. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 17, 105 (Abstr.)
• Seralini G.-E., Cellier D., de Vendomris J.S., 2007. New analysis of rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch Environ. ContSpiekers H., Meyer H.H.D., Schwarz F.J., 2009. Effects of long term utilzation of genetically modified maize (MON 810) in dairy cattle feeding on performance and metabolism parameters (in German). Schriftenreihe, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL), 18, p. 105
• Spencer J.D., Allee G.L., Sauber T.E., 2000. Phosphorus bioavailablity and digestibility of normal and genetically modified low-phytate com for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 675-681
• Spiekers H., Meyer H.H.D., Schwarz F.J., 2009. Effects of long term utilzation of genetically modified maize (MON 810) in dairy cattle feeding on performance and metabolism parameters (in German). Schriftenreihe, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL), 18, p. 105
• Stein A.J., Rodriguez-Cerezo E., 2009. The global pipeline of new GM-crops. JRC/ipts, EUR 23496 EN, p. 102
• Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., de Haan C., 2006. Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
• Steinke K., Paul V., Gürtler P., Preisinger W., Wiedemann S., Albrecht C., Spiekers H., Meyer H.H.D., Schwarz F.J., 2009. Effects of long term feeding of genetically modified maize (Btmaize; MON810) to dairy cows on performance and metabolic parameters. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 18, 110 (Abstr.)
• Surov A.V., 2009. Alteration of physiological characteristics of mammals at feeding with genetically modified components of plant origin. Report on Scientific-Technical Study, Institute of RussianAcademy of Science, Moscow
• The Royal Society, 2009. Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. RS policy document 11/09, issued October 2009 RS 1608, ISBN: 978-0-85403-784-1
• Velimirov A., Binter C., Zentek J., 2008. Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice. Res. Report Section IV, Vol.3/2008 of the Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Familie und Jugend, Sektion IV, Vienna (Austria) Waterlow J.C., 1999. The mysteries of nitrogen balance. Nutr. Res. Rev. 12, 25-54