Embryology, taxonomy and evolution in parasitic flowering plants

• Autorzy: Pare J. , Raynal-Roques A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The embryogenic types of the families of parasitic flowering plants are used to analyze the classification of these plants. Parasitic flowering plants are located mainly in specialized groups in the upper part of the taxonomic classification. Holoparasitic plants are not numerous and belong to these most specialized groups. This paper synthesizes two protocols to provide information permitting evaluation, discussion and significant reflections concerning evolution in parasitic flowering plants. It is an earnest appeal to embryologists to integrate the evolution of parasitic flowering plants into developmental embryology, and to taxonomists to recognize that embryology is highly interdisciplinary.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

embryo sac; parasitic flowering plant; embryogenic type; embryology; embryogenesis; evolution; endosperm; taxonomy

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 1999
• Tom: 41
• Opis fizyczny: p.85-94,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Pare J.

• Universite de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 rue Saint Leu, 80039 Amiens Cedex 1, France

autor

Raynal-Roques A.

Bibliografia

• Arekal GD. 1963. Embryological studies in Canadian representatives of the tribe Rhinantheae, Scrophulariaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 41: 267-302.
• Arekal GD. 1965. Embryology of Mimulus ringens. Botanical Gazette 126: 58-66.
• Arekal GD, Rajeshwari S, and Ramaswamy SN. 1971. Contribution to the embryology of Scoparia dulcís L. Botaniska Notiser 124: 237-248.
• Batygina TB, and Yakovlev MS [eds.]. 1987. Comparative embryology of flowering plants, vol. 4. Davidiaceae - Asteraceae. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian).
• Bentham G, and Hooker JD.1965. (Original edition 1862-1867 and 1873-1876) Genera plantarum, vols. 1 and 2. Kramer, Weinheim (FRG).
• Bhandari NN. 1971. Embryology of the Magnoliales and comments on their relationships. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 52: 1-39; 285-304.
• Bhandari NN, and Nanda K. 1968. Studies in the Viscaceae 1. Morphology and embryology of the Indian dwarf mistletoe: Arceuthobium minutissimum Hook. Phytomorphology 18: 435-450.
• Bhandari NN, and Vohra SCA. 1983. Embryology and affinities of Viscaceae. In: Calder M, Bernhardt P [eds.], The biology of mistletoes, 69-86. Academic Press, New York, London, Sydney.
• Bhatnagar SP, and Johri BM. 1983. Embryology of Loranthaceae. In: Calder M, Bernhardt P [eds.], The biology of mistletoes, 47-67, Academic Press, New York, London, Sydney.
• Bhattacharyya B, and Johri BM. 1998. Flowering plants. Taxonomy and phytogeny. Springer-Verlag. Norosa Publishing House.
• Cohen LI. 1963. Studies on the ontogeny of the dwarf mistletoes, Arceuthobium 1. Embryogeny and histogenesis. American Journal of Botany 50: 400-407.
• Crété P. 1950. Embryologie des Scrofulariacées. L’albumen et l’embryon chez les Nemesia. Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 97: 177-179.
• Crété P. 1955. L’application de certaines données embryologiques a la systématique des Orobanchacées et de quelques familles voisines. Phytomorphology 5 (1-4): 422- 435.
• Crété P. 1964. L’albumen et l’embryon du Mimulus moschatus Dougl. (Scrofulariacées). Phytomorphology 14: 468-472.
• Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New-York.
• Dahlgren RMT. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91-124.
• Dahlgren R. 1981. Angiosperm classification and phylogeny. A rectifying comment. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 89-92.
• Dastur RH. 1922. Notes on the development of the ovule, embryo sac and embryo of Hydnora Africana Thumb. Transactions Society South Africa 10: 27-31.
• Davis GL. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• Dixit SN. 1958. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Loranthaceae 5. Lepeostegeres gemmiflorus (Bl.) Bl. Phytomorphology 8. 365-376.
• Ekambaran T, and Panje RR. 1935. Contribution to our knowledge of Balanophora. 2-Life history of B. dioica. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences B1: 522-543.
• Endriss K. 1902. Monographie von Pilostyles ingae. Flora 91: 209-236.
• Engler A, and Prantl K [eds.]. 1931. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
• Ernst A, and Schmid E. 1913. Über Blüte und Frucht von Rafflesiaceae. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 12: 1-58.
• Fagerlind F. 1948. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gynöceummorphologie und Phylogenie der Santalales-Familien. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 42: 195-229.
• Fedortschuk W. 1931. Embryologische Untersuchungen von Cuscuta monogyna Vahl. und C. epithymum L. Planta, 14: 94-111.
• Fueur S. 1981. Pollen morphology and relationships of the My- zodendraceae (Santalales). Nordsk Journal of Botany. 731- 734.
• Hooker JD. 1846. Flora Antarctica, part 2. Loranthaceae: 289- 302.
• Hutchinson J. 1973. The families of flowering plants, ed. 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford (England).
• Johansen DA. 1950. Plant embryology. Chronica Botánica, Waltham (Mass, USA).
• Johnson T. 1889. The nursing of the embryo and some other points in Myzodendron punctatum Nanks et Soland. Annals of Botany 3: 179-206.
• Johri BM, and Tiagi B. 1952. Floral morphology and seed formation in Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Phytomorphology 2: 162-180.
• Johri BM, and Bhatnagar SP. 1960. Embryology and taxonomy of the Santalales. 1. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences India B 26: 199-220.
• Johri BM, Ambegaokar KB, and Srivastava PS. 1992. Comparative embryology of Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest.
• Kuijt J. 1969. The biology of flowering parasitic plants. Univ. Cal. Press, Berkeley.
• Lebègue A. 1989. Reflections about an embryogenic system. In: Paré J, Bugnicourt M [eds.], Some aspects and actual orientations in plant embryology. Dedicatory volume to Professor A. Lebègue, 45-59. Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens.
• Mabberley DJ. 1997. The plant-book, ed. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
• Melchior H. 1964. A. Engler's Syllabus des Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 2. Bornträger, Berlin.
• Ozenda P, and Capdepon M. 1979. L’appareil haustorial des Phanérogames parasites. Revue Générale de Botanique 86: 235-343.
• Paré J, Bugnicourt M, Raynal-Roques A, and Sallé G. 1991. Embryological investigations of the development of the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Scrophulariaceae. In: Ransom JK, Musselman L, Worsham AD, Parker C [eds.]. Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds, 523-524. Nairobi, Kenya.
• Paré J, and Raynal-Roques A. 1993-94. The genus Striga (Scrophulariaceae): taxonomy, geography, distribution; first embryological results in Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Scourge of food crops in tropical Africa, with special reference to the action of an herbicide on seed development. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 34: 25-35.
• Ram M. 1959. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Santalaceae 2. Exocarpus with a discussion on its systematic position. Phytomorphology 9: 4-19.
• Raynal-Roques A. 1994 [1995]. Major, minor and potential parasitic weeds in semi-arid tropical Africa: the example of Scrophulariaceae. In: Pieterse AH, Verkleij JAC, and Borg SJ [eds.], Biology and Management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and related Striga Research, 400-405. Amsterdam.
• Raynal-Roques A. 1996. An hypothetic history of Striga, a preliminary draft. In: Moreno T and Cubero J [eds.], Advances in parasitic plant research. Proceedings of the 6th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, 105-111. Cordoba.
• Raynal-Roques A, and Pare J. 1998. Biodiversité des Phanérogames parasites: leur place dans la classification systématique. Adansonia sér. 3, 20 (2): 313-322.
• Reed CF. 1955. The comparative morphology of the Olacaceae, Opiliaceae and Octoknemataeae. Memory Sociedad Broteriana 10: 29-79.
• Rutishauser A. 1937. Blütenmorphologische und embryologische Untersuchungen an den Viscoideen Korthalsella opuntia Merr. und Ginalloa linearis Dans. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 47: 5-28.
• Sallé G, Tuquet C, and Raynal-Roques A. 1998 Biologie des Phanérogames parasites. Comptes-rendus de la Société de Biologie 192: 9-36.
• Sastri RLN. 1962. Studies in Lauraceae. 3- Embryology of Cassytha. Botanical Gazette 123: 197-206.
• Schnarf K. 1929. Embryologie der Angiospermen. Bornträger, Berlin.
• Souèges R. 1948. Embryogénie et Classification: Essai d’un Système embryogénique. Partie spéciale, Prèmiere période du Systeme. Hermann et Cie, Paris.
• Souèges R. 1951. Embryogénie et Classification: Essai d’un Système embryogénique. Partie spéciale, Deuxième période du Système. Hermann et Cie, Paris.
• Souèges R. 1961. Proarchétypes, archétypes et sous-archétypes en embryogénie; III Les sous-archétypes. Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 252: 3481-3486.
• Stauffer HU. 1957. Zur Stellung der Gattung Okoubaka Santalales - Studien 1. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 66: 422-427.
• Süssenguth K. 1927. Über die Gattung Lennoa. Flora 122: 264- 305.
• Swamy BGL. 1960. Contribution to the embryology of Cansjera rheedi. Phytomorphology 10: 397-409.
• Takhtajan AL. 1969. Flowering plants. Origin and dispersal. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
• Takhtajan AL. 1973. Evolution und Ausbreitung der Blütenpflanzen. Fisher, Stuttgart.
• Takhtajan AL. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanical Revue 46 (3): 225-359.
• Takhtajan AL. 1987. System Magnoliophytorum. Officina editoria "Nauka" sectio Leninopoliana. Leninopoli.
• Taneja S. 1969. Embryology in Nemesia strumosa Benth. Current Sciences 38: 522.
• Teryokin ES, and Yakovlev MS. 1967. Embryology of Balanophoraceae (on the problem of homologies of the "flower" of Balanophora). Botaniceskyi Zhurnal 52: 745-748. (In Rus­sian).
• Tiagi B. 1951. A contribution to the morphology and embryology of Cuscuta hyalina Roth, and C. planiflora Tenore. Phytomorphology 1: 9-21.
• Tiagi B. 1952. Studies in the family Orobanchaceae 2. A contribution to the embryology of Aegenitia indica Linn. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 79: 63-68.
• Tiagi B. 1956. A contribution to the embryology of Striga orobanchioides Benth. and Striga euphrasioides Benth. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 79: 63-68.
• Venturelli M. 1981. Embriologia de Struthanthus vulgaris (Loranthacae-Loranthoideae). Kurtziana 14: 73-100.
• Visser JH. 1981. South African parasitic flowering plants. Juta, Cape Town.
• Verkerke W. 1986. Ovule ontogenesis and seed-coat development in Krameria loefling (Krameriaceae). Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 60: 341-351.
• Weber HC. 1993. Parasitismus von Blütenpflanzen. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (Germany).
• Wettstein R. 1933-1935. Handbuch des systematischen Botanik, 4th ed. Deutike, Leipzig.
• Willis JC. 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. 8th ed. (revised by Airy Shaw HK). Univ. Press, Cambridge (England).
• Yakovlev MS [ed.] 1981. Comparative embryology of flowering plants, vol. 1. Winteraceae-Juglandaceae. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian).
• Zweifel R. 1939. Cytologisch-embryologische Untersuchungen Balanophora abbreviata Blume und B. indica Wall. Vierteljaheresschr. Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Zürich 84: 245-306.