Morphological and anatomical variability of isozymatically identified clones of Pinus mugo Turra

• Autorzy: Baczkiewicz A , Prus-Glowacki W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study examined the anatomical and morphological variability of 10 needle traits in isozymatically identified clones of three peatbog populations of Pinus mugo, focusing on variation within and between clones, and the relation between isozyme variation and morpho-anatomical characters of needles. In each peatbog there were clones exhibiting high and low plasticity of the anatomical and morphological traits studied. In general, three types of variation within clones were distinguished: (1) clones with ramets very similar to each other, (2) clones with extensive intra-clone variability, and (3) clones with intermediate variability. The differences in phenotypic variability within clones may be explained by differences in the reaction norm of ramets in particular clones and by somatic mutations. In respect to anatomical, morphological and isozymatic traits, clones from the same peatbog showed more similarity to each other than to clones from other peatbogs.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

clonal plant; needle morphology; dwarf mountain pine; plant genetics; needle anatomy; Pinus mugo; phenotypic plasticity

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: 47
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.33-40,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Baczkiewicz A

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Miedzychodzka 5, 60-371 Poznan, Poland

autor

Prus-Glowacki W.

Bibliografia

• Antion MF, and Strobeck C. 1985. The population genetics of somatic mutation in plants. American Naturalist 126: 52-62.
• Aspinwall N, and Christian T. 1992. Clonal structure, genotypic diversity, and seed production in populations of Filipendula rubra (Rosaceae) from the north central United States. American Journal of Botany 79: 294-299.
• Bączkiewicz A, and Prus-Głowacki W. 1997. Variability of Pinus mugo Turra clones from Ostry Wierch peat bog. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 66: 79-82.
• Caliński T, Czajka S, and Kaczmarek Z. 1975. Analiza skladowych głównych i jej zastosowanie. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, Algorytmy Biometryczne i Statystyczne 36: 159-185.
• Caliński T, and Kaczmarek Z. 1973. Metody kompleksowej analizy doświadczenia wielocechowego. Wydz. V PAN i PTB, Warszawa, Wrocław.
• Douglas DA. 1991. Clonal architecture of Salix setcheliana (graver bar willow) in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 590-597.
• Falconer DS. 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 49-56. Ronald Press, New York.
• Gullberg U, Yazdani R, Rudin D, and Ryman N. 1985. Allozyme variation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Sweden. Silvae Genetica 34: 193-201.
• Guttman DS. 1997. Recombination and clonality in natural population of Escherichia coli. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 16-22.
• Harper JL. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.
• Hotelling H. 1957. The relation of the multivariate statistical methods to factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology 10: 69-79.
• Hutchings MJ, and de Kroon H. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159-238.
• Kemperman JA, and Barnes BV. 1976. Clone size in American aspens. Canadian Journal Botany 54: 2603-2607.
• Klekowski EJ. 1988. Mutation, developmental selection, and plant evolution. Columbia University Press. New York.
• Krzyśko M. 1982. Analiza dyskryminacyjna. Wyd. UAM w Poznaniu, Ser. Mat. Nr 6, Poznań.
• Krzyśko M. 1990. Analiza dyskryminacyjna.Wyd. Nauk.-Tech., Warszawa.
• Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, U.S.A.
• Łomnicki A. 1999. Wprowadzenie do statystyki dla przyrodników. PWN, Warszawa.
• Mitton JB, and Grant MC. 1980. Observations on the ecology and evolution of quaking aspen, Populus tremuloides, in the Colorado front range. American Journal of Botany 67: 202-209.
• Morabito D, Jolivet Y, Prat D, and Dizengremel P. 1996. Differences in the physiological responses of two clones of Eucalyptus microtheca selected for their salt tolerance. Plant Science 114: 129-139.
• Navas ML, and Garnier E. 2002. Plasticity of whole plant and leaf in Rubia peregrina in response to light, nutrient and water availability. Acfa Oecologica 23: 375-383.
• Obidowicz A. 1975. Entstehung und Alter einiger Moore im nrdlichen Teil der Hohen Tatra - Geneza i wiek kilku torfowisk po północnej stronie Tatr Wysokich. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 3: 289-323.
• Oleksyn J, Prus-Głowacki W, Giertych M, and Reich PB. 1994. Relation between genetic diversity and pollution impact in a 1912 experiment with East European Pinus sylvestris provenances. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 2390-2394.
• Orive ME. 2001. Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life histories. Theoretical Population Biology 59: 235-249.
• Pigliucci M. 1996. How organisms respond to environmental changes: from phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa). Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 168-173.
• Prus-Głowacki W, Oleksyn J, and Reich PB. 1998. Relation between genetic structure and susceptibility to air pollution of Europe Pinus sylvestris populations from an Iufro - 1982 provenance experiment. Chemosphere 36: 813-818.
• Prus-Głowacki W, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Oleksyn J, and Reich PB. 1999. Industrial pollutants tend to increase genetic diversity: evidence from field-grown European Scots pine populations. Water, Air and Soil Pollution (WASP) 116: 395-402.
• Rudin D, and Ekberg T. 1978. Linkage studies in Pinus sylvestris L. - using macrogametophyte allozymes. Silvea Genetica 27: 1-12.
• Seneta W, and Dolatowski J. 1997. Dendrologia. PWN, Warszawa.
• Schmid B. 1990. Some ecological and evolutionary consequences of modular organization and clonal growth in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 4: 25-34.
• Sneath PH, and Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman and Comp., San Francisco.
• Silander JA. 1979. Microevolution and clone structure in Spartina patens. Science 203: 658-660.
• Silander JA. 1985. Microevolution in clonal plants. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE [eds], Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms, 107-152. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
• Sipes SD, and Wolf PG. 1997. Clonal structure and patterns of allozyme diversity in the rare endemic Cycladenia humilis var .jonesii (Apocynaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 401-409.
• Sokal RR, and Rohlf FJ. 1997. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
• Szmalhauzen II. 1975. Czynniki ewolucji. Teoria doboru stabilizującego. PWN, Warszawa.
• Szmidt AE, and Yazdani R. 1984. Electrophoretic studies of genetic polymorphism of shikimate and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenases in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Arboretum Kórnickie 29: 63-72.
• Środoń A. 1959. Zarys historycznego rozwoju szaty roślinnej Polski w późnym glacjale i postglacjale. In: Szafer W [ed.], Szata roślinna Polski, 531-532. PWN, Warszawa.
• Turkington R, Sackville Halmilton NR, and Gliddon C. 1991. Within-population variation in localized responses of Trifolium repens to biotically patchy environments. Oecologica 86: 183-192.
• Williams B. 1995. Biostatistics concepts and applications for biologists. Chapman and Hall, New York.
• Yazdani R, Muona O, and Szmidt EA. 1985. Genetic structure of a seed tree stand and naturally regenerated plants of Pinus sylvestris L. Forest Science 31: 430-436.