PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2010 | 18 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

In vitro regeneration of Punica granatum L. plants from different juvenile explants

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

PL
Regeneracja in vitro roslin Punica granatum L. z roznych eksplantatow uzyskanych z mlodych siewek

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Reliable and reproducible protocols to get healthy and well formed plants from juvenile explants of the pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. 'Kandhari Kabuli' have been developed. Calli were initiated from cotyledon, hypocotyl, leaf and internode sections excised from 30 days old in vitro germinated seedlings. The best media for callus induction from cotyledon, hypocotyl, internode and leaf explants were MS medium supplemented with 13.0 ^M NAA and 13.5 ^M BA, 13.0 ^M NAA and 18.0 ^M BA, 5.0 ^M IBA and 9.0 ^M BA, 8.0 ^M NAA and 9.0 ^M kinetin, respectively. The highest percentage of callus was obtained from cotyledon explants (85.50) followed by hypocotyl (79.67), internode (79.47) and leaf (75.48) explants. The calli thus obtained showed differentiation on MS medium supplemented with 9.0 ^M BA and 2.5 ^M NAA. Cotyledon derived callus showed the highest regeneration rate (81.97%, with mean number of 16.47 shoots per explant) followed by hypocotyl, internode and leaf derived calli. In vitro rooting was best on half strength MS medium containing 500 mg l-1 of activated charcoal. The plantlets with well formed root systems were transferred to plastic cups containing cocopeat followed by transfer to earthen pots containing soil and sand (1:1).
PL
Przedstawiono wiarygodny i odtwarzalny przebieg doświadczenia mającego na celu otrzymanie zdrowych i kształtnych roślin z eksplantatów uzyskanych z młodych siewek granatowca Punica granatum L. 'Kandhari Kabuli'. Kalusy otrzymano z wycinków liścienia, hypokotyla, liścia i łodygi z 30-dniowych sadzonek doprowadzonych do kiełkowania metodą in vitro. Najlepszą pożywką dla indukcji embriologicznej kalusa z eksplantatów pochodzących z liścienia, hypokotyla, łodygi i liścia były pożywki MS uzupełnione odpowiednio 13,0 ^M NAA i 13,5 ^M BA, 13,0 ^M NAA i 18,0 ^M BA, 5,0 ^M IBA i 9,0 ^M BA, 8,0 ^M NAA i 9,0 ^M kinetyny. Największy procent kalusów otrzymano z eksplantatów uzyskanych z liścienia (85,50), następnie z hypokotyla (79,67), łodygi (79,47) i liścia (75,48). Otrzymane w ten sposób kalusy wykazafy zróżnicowanie na pożywce MS uzupełnionej 9,0 ^M BA i 2,5 ^M NAA. Kalus uzyskany z liścienia wykazał najwyższy wskaźnik regeneracji (81,97% ze średnią liczbą 61,47 pędów na eksplantant), następnie uzyskany z hypocotyla, łodygi i liścia. Ukorzenianie metodą in vitro dało najlepsze wyniki na zmniejszonej o połowę pożywce MS i zawierającej 500 mg l-1 węgla aktywnego. Roślinki z dobrze ukształtowanym systemem korzeniowym byty przeniesione z plastikowych pojemników zawieraj ących włókna kokosowe do glinianych doniczek zawierających ziemię i piasek (1:1).

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

18

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.5-22,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
autor

Bibliografia

  • Agarwal S., Kanwar K. 2007. Comparison of genetic transformation in Morus alba L. via different regeneration systems. PLANT CELL REP. 26: 177-185.
  • Amin M.N., Islam M.N., Azad M.A.K. 1999. Regeneration of plantlets in vitro from the seedling explants of pomegranate (Punica granatum). PLANT TISSUE CULT. 9(1): 53-61.
  • Akbar M.A., Karmakar B.K., Roy S.K. 2003. Callus induction and high frequency plant regeneration of pine apple (Ananas comosus L. Mers.) PLANT TISSUE CULT. 13(2): 109­116.
  • Bhansali R.R. 1990. Somatic embryo­genesis and regeneration of plantlets in pomegranate. ANN. BOT. 66(3): 249-253.
  • Bhojwani S.S., RazdanM.K. (eds) 1983. Cellular totipotency. In: Plant Tissue Culture: Theory and Practice. Elsevier Amsterdam-London-New York-Tokyo, pp. 71-90.
  • Caboni E., Tonelli M.G., Lauri P., Angeli S.D., Damiano C. 1999. In vitro shoot regeneration from leaves of wild pear. PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 59(1): 1-7.
  • Canli F.A., Tian L. 2008. In vitro shoot regeneration from stored mature cotyledons of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. SCI. HORT. 116(1): 34-40.
  • Chaugule R.R., More T.A., Patil R.S., Kamble A.B. 2005. Callus culture for rapid regeneration of pomegranate. J. MAHARASHTRA AGRIC. UNI- VERSIT. 30(1): 85-86.
  • Chakravarty B., Goswami B.C. 1999. Plantlet regeneration from long term callus cultures of Citrus acida Roxb. and the uniformity of regenerated plants. SCI. HORT. 82: 159-169.
  • FanK.H., Jiang Z.T. 1993. Studies on callus induction and plantlet regeneration from apple cotyledon. J. SHANGHAI AGRIC. COLLEGE 11(3): 243-248.
  • Feeney M., Bhagwat B., Mitchell J., Lane W.D. 2007. Shoot regeneration from organogenic callus of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 90(2): 201-214.
  • Foughat R.S., Pandya S.B., Ahmad T., Godhani P.R. 1997. In vitro studies in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). J. APPLIED HORTIC. NAVSARI 3(1-2): 23-29.
  • Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. 1984. Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York, pp. 328-332.
  • Hammerschlag F.A., Bauchan G., Scorza R. 1985. Regeneration of Peach plants from callus derived from immature embryos. THEORET. APPL. GENET. 70(3): 248-251.
  • Jaidka K., Mehra P.N. 1986. Morphogenesis in Punica granatum (pomegranate). CANADIAN J. BOTANY 64: 1644­1653.
  • Jayesh K.C., Kumar R. 2004. Crossability in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). INDIAN J. HORT. 61(3): 209-210.
  • Kantharajah A.S., Dewitz I., Jabbari S. 1998. The effect of media, plant growth regulators and source of explants on in vitro culture of pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.). ERWERBS-OBSTBAU 40(2): 54-58.
  • Kanwar K., Joseph J., Raj Deepika 2010. Comparison of in vitro regeneration pathways in Punica granatum L. PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 100:199-207.
  • Kanwar K., Kaushal B., Abrol S., Raj Deepika 2008. Plant regeneration in Robinia pseudoacacia L. from cell suspension cultures. BIOL. PLANT- ARUM 1(1): 187-190.
  • Kanwar K., Rachna, Kashyap A. 2004. In vitro propagation of wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). National Seminar on IPR of Horticultural Crops, 12-13 October, 2004 Solan, India.
  • Liu X., Pijut P.M. 2008. Plant regeneration from in vitro leaves of mature black cherry (Prunus serótina). PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 4(2): 113-123.
  • Mahishni D.M., Muralikishna A., Shivashankar G., Kulkarni R.S. 1991. Shoot tip culture method for rapid clonal propagation of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). In: Horticulture New Technologies and Applications Proc. Int. Seminar on New Frontiers in Horticulture. Indo-American Hybrid Seeds. Bangalore, pp. 215-217.
  • Mondal M., Gupta S., Mukhrejee B.B. 1994. Callus culture and plantlet production in Carica papaya (var. Honey Dew). PLANT CELL REP. 18:873-878.
  • Moriguchi T., Omura M., Matsuta N., Kozaki I. 1987. In vitro adventitious shoot formation form anthers of pomegranate. HORT. SCI. 22: 947-948.
  • Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. PHYSIOL. PLANT. 15: 473-497.
  • Murkute A.A., Patil S., Singh S.K. 2004. In vitro regeneration in pomegranate cv. Ganesh from mature trees. INDIAN J. HORT. 61(3): 206-208.
  • Murkute A.A., Patil S., Patil B.N., Kumari M. 2002. Micropropagation in pomegranate, callus induction and differentiation. SOUTH INDIAN HORT. 50(1,3): 49-55.
  • Naik S.K., Chand P.K. 2003. Silver nitrate and aminoethoxy vinyl glycine promote in vitro adventitious shoot regeneration of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). J. PLANT PHYSIOL. 160(4): 423-430.
  • Naik S.K., Pattnaik S., Chand P.K. 1999. In vitro propagation of pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Ganesh) through axillary shoot proliferation from nodal segments of mature tree. SCI. HORT. 79: 175-183.
  • Naik S.K., Pattnaik S., Chand P.K. 2000. High frequency axillary shoot proliferation and plant regeneration from cotyledonary nodes of pome­granate (Punica granatum L.). SCI. HORT. 85: 261-270.
  • Nataraja K., Neelambika G.K. 1996. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet formation from petal cultures of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). INDIAN J. EXP. BIOL. 34(7): 719­721.
  • Omura M., Matsuta N., Moriguchi T., Kazaki I. 1987. Adventitious shoot and plantlet formation from cultured pomegranate leaf explants. HORT- SCIENCE 22: 133-134.
  • Raj Deepika, Kanwar K. 2008. Efficient in vitro shoot multiplication and root induction enhanced by rejuvenation of microshoots in Punica granatum cv. Kandhari Kabuli. National Seminar on Physiological and Biotechnological Approaches to Improve Plant Productivity, March 15-18, 2008, CCSHAU, Hisar, India, 24 p.
  • Sharon M., Sinha S. 2000. Plant regeneration from cotyledonary node of Punica granatum L. INDIAN J. PLANT PHYSIOL. 5(4): 344-348.
  • Singh N.V., Singh S.K., Patel V.B. 2007. In vitro axillary shoot proliferation and clonal propagation of 'G-137' pomegranate (Punica granatum). INDIAN J. AGRIC. SCI. 77(8): 505-508.
  • Sriskandarajah S., Goodwin P.B., Speirs J. 1994. Genetic transformation of the apple scion cultivar 'Delicious' via Agrobacterium tumefaciens. PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 36(3): 317-329.
  • Techato S., Hilae A., In-perey K. 2008. Effect of cytokinin types and concen­trations on growth and development of cell suspension culture of oil palm. J. AGRIC. TECH. 4(2): 157-163.
  • Verdeil J.L., Huet C., Grosdernange F, Buffard-Morel J. 1994. Plant regeneration from cultured immature inflorescences of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. PLANT CELL REP. 13:218-221.
  • Yadav U., Lal M., Jaiswal V.S. 1990. In vitro micropropagation of the tropical fruit tree Syzygium cuminii L. PLANT CELL TISSUE ORGAN CULT. 21: 87-92.
  • Yang Z.H., Ludders P. 1993. Organogenesis of Punica granatum L. var. Nana. ANGEWANDTE BOTANIK 67(5-6): 151-156.
  • Zhang B.L., Stolz L.P. 1991. In vitro shoot formation and elongation of dwarf pomegranate. HORT. SCI. 26(8): 1084.
  • Zhu L.W., Zhang S.M., Song F.S., Gong X.M., Fang W.J., Sun J., Li S.W. 2003. Regeneration system of pomegranate by in vitro culture. ACTA HORT. SINICA 430(2): 207-208.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-c3799408-fd5c-439e-b58e-f7c8c41565b5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.