PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2001 | 48 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Repair of gamma-ray-induced base damage in L5178Y sublines is damage type-dependent und unrelated to radiation sensitivity

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The L5178Y (LY) murine lym phoma sublines LY-R and LY-S are dif fer en tially sen si tive to ion iz ing ra di a tion. The high ra di a tion sen si tiv ity of LY-S cells is re lated to im­paired rejoining of DNA double strand breaks. We found previously that the g-ray-induced base dam age is higher in the more radiosensitive LY-S subline. Here, we ex am ine the role of the re pair of ion iz ing ra di a tion in duced base dam age in re la tion to the radiosensitivity dif fer ence of these sublines. We used the GS/MS tech nique to es ti mate the re pair rates of six types of base dam­age in g-irradiated LY cells. All mod i fied DNA bases iden ti fied in the course ofthis study were typ i cal for ir ra di ated chromatin. The to tal amount of ini tial base dam age was higher in the ra di a tion sen si tive LY-S subline than in the ra di a tion re sis tant LY-R subline. The re pair rates of 5-OHMeUra, 5-OHCyt, 8-OHAde were sim i lar in both cell lines, the re pair rates of FapyAde and 8-OHGua were higher in the radiosensitive LY-S cell line, whereas the re pair of 5-OHUra was faster in its radio resistant coun ter part, the LY-R. Al to gether, the re pair rates of the g-ray-induced DNA base dam age in LY sublines are re lated nei ther to the ini tial amounts of the dam aged bases nor to the dif fer en tial le thal or mutagenic ef fects of ion iz ing ra di a tion in these sublines.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

48

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.525-533,fig.

Twórcy

  • Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1.Ward, J.F. (1999) Nature of lesions formed by ionizing radiation; in DNA Damage and Repair, vol 2: DNA Repair in Higher Eucaryotes (Nickoloff, J.A. & Hoekstra, M.F., eds.) pp. 65-84, Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey.
  • 2.Wallace, S.S. (1998) Enzymatic processing of radiation-induced free radical damage in DNA. Radiat. Res. 150, S60-S79.
  • 3.Beer, J.Z., Budzicka, E., Niepokojczycka, E., Rosiek, O., Szumiel, I. & Walicka, M. (1983) Loss of tumorigenicity with simultaneous changes in radiosensitivity and photosensitivity during in vitro growth of L5178Y murine lymphoma cells. Cancer Res. 43, 4736-4742.
  • 4.Bouzyk, E., Buraczewska, I., Rosiek, O., Sochanowicz, B. & Szumiel, I. (1991) Hydrogen peroxide induced reproductive and interphase death in two strains of L5178Y murine lymphoma differing in radiation sensitivity. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 30, 105-116.
  • 5.Bouzyk, E., Iwanenko, T., Jarocewicz, N., Kruszewski, M., Sochanowicz, B. & Szumiel, I. (1997) Antioxidant defense system in differentially hydrogen peroxide sensitive L5178Y sublines. Free Radical Biol. Med. 22, 697-704.
  • 6.Kruszewski, M., Green, M.H., Lowe, J.E. & Szumiel, I. (1994) DNA strand breakage, cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of hydrogen peroxide treatment at 4deg;C and 37deg;C in L5178Y sublines. Mutat. Res. 308, 233-241.
  • 7.Kruszewski, M., Green, M.H., Lowe, J.E. & Szumiel, I. (1995) Comparison of effects of iron and calcium chelators on the response of L5178Y sublines to X-rays and H2O2. Mutat. Res. 326, 155-163.
  • 8.Wlodek, D. & Hittelman, W.N. (1987) The repair of double-strand DNA breaks correlates with radiosensitivity of L5178Y-S and L5178Y-R cells. Radiat. Res. 112, 146-155.
  • 9.Wlodek, D. & Hittelman, W.N. (1988) The relationship of DNA and chromosome damage to survival of synchronized X-irradiated L5178Y cells. II. Repair. Radiat. Res. 115, 566-575.
  • 10.Wlodek, D. & Hittelman, W.N. (1988) The relationship of DNA and chromosome damage to survival of synchronized X-irradiated L5178Y cells. I. Initial damage. Radiat. Res. 115, 550-565.
  • 11.Kapiszewska, M., Szumiel, I. & Lange, C.S. (1992) Damage at two levels of DNA folding measured by fluorescent halo technique in X-irradiated L5178Y-R and L5178Y-S cells. I. Initial lesions. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 31, 311-322.
  • 12.Szumiel, I., Kapiszewska, M., Kruszewski, M., Iwanenko, T. & Lange, C.S. (1995) Content of iron and copper in the nuclei and induction of pH 9-labile lesions in L5178Y sublines inversely cross-sensitive to H2O2 and X-rays. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 34, 113-119.
  • 13.Zastawny, T.H., Kruszewski, M. & Olinski, R. (1998) Ionizing radiation and hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative DNA base damage in two L5178Y cell lines. Free Radical Biol. Med. 24, 1250-1255.
  • 14.Mori, T. & Dizdaroglu, M. (1994) Ionizing radiation causes greater DNA base damage in radiation-sensitive mutant M10 cells than in parent mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells. Radiat. Res. 140, 85-90.
  • 15.Szumiel, I. (1979) Response of two strains of L5178Y cells to cis-dichlorobis (cyclopentylamine)platinum(II). I. Cross-sensitivity to cis- PAD and UV light. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 24, 51-72.
  • 16.Mee, L.K. & Adelstein, S.J. (1981) Predominance of core histones in formation of DNA- protein crosslinks in gamma-irradiated chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2194- 2198.
  • 17.Dizdaroglu, M. (1994) Chemical determination of oxidative DNA damage by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol. 234, 3-16.
  • 18.Halliwell, B. & Dizdaroglu, M. (1992) The measurement of oxidative damage to DNA by HPLC and GC/MS techniques. Free Radical Res. Commun. 16, 75-87.
  • 19.Ward, J.F. (1995) Radiation mutagenesis: The initial DNA lesions responsible. Radiat. Res. 142, 362-368.
  • 20.Dizdaroglu, M., Rao, G., Halliwell, B. & Gajewski, E. (1991) Damage to the DNA bases in mammalian chromatin by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of ferric and cupric ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 285, 317-324.
  • 21.Gajewski, E., Rao, G., Nackerdien, Z. & Dizdaroglu, M. (1990) Modification of DNA bases in mammalian chromatin by radiation-generated free radicals. Biochemistry 29, 7876-7882.
  • 22.Martins, E.A., Chubatsu, L.S. & Meneghini, R. (1991) Role of antioxidants in protecting cellular DNA from damage by oxidative stress. Mutat. Res. 250, 95-101.
  • 23.Meneghini, R. (1997) Iron homeostasis, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. Free Radical Biol. Med. 23, 783-792.
  • 24.Aldridge, D.R. & Radford, I.R. (1998) Explaining differences in sensitivity to killing by ionizing radiation between human lymphoid cell lines. Cancer Res. 58, 2817-2824.
  • 25.Laval, J., Jurado, J., Saparbaev, M. & Sidorkina, O. (1998) Antimutagenic role of base-excision repair enzymes upon free radical-induced DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 402, 93-102.
  • 26.Beckman, K.B. & Ames, B.N. (1997) Oxidative decay of DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19633- 19636.
  • 27.Loft, S. & Poulsen, H.E. (1996) Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. J. Mol. Med. 74, 297-312.
  • 28.Bohr, V.A. & Anson, R.M. (1995) DNA damage, mutation and fine structure DNA repair in aging. Mutat. Res. 338, 25-34.
  • 29.Evans, H.H., Ricanati, M., Di Salvo, C., Horng, M.F. & Mencl, J. (1991) Induction of multilocus lesions by UVC-radiation in mouse L5178Y lymphoblasts. Mutation Res. 251, 79-90.
  • 30.Yi, P.N., Evans, H.H., Beer, J.Z. & Rha, C.K. (1994) Relationships between mitotic delay and the dose rate of X radiation. Radiat. Res. 140, 387-392.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-article-ae302d87-d8e6-4022-bcd1-4d627b7817cd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.