Evaluation of cell membrane injury in caraway [Carum carvi L.] genotypes in water deficit conditions

• Autorzy: Seidler-Lozykowska K , Bandurska H. , Bocianowski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to evaluate the resistance of caraway genotypes to water deficit based on the estimation of cell membrane stability (CMS) in leaves using polyethylene glycol (PEG) test. In 2007 and 2008, 25 selected caraway genotypes, originating from European botanical gardens (18), cultivars (2) and our own breeding strains (5), were tested. The plant material was collected from the experimental field. The obtained results showed highly significant differences in cell membrane injuries (p = 0.001) among investigated genotypes. The rank of genotypes in membrane injury index in 2007 was similar to that of 2008. Caraway genotypes originating from Warsaw (49.4%), Cracow (45.3%), Reykiavik (39.9%), Berlin (23.8%), Wisley (22.7%) and strains 9/2 (23.7%), 60/8 (22.2%) exhibited a high level of injury, which showed weak CMS and their high sensitivity to drought. The lowest extent of membrane injury was observed in genotypes originating from Bayreuth (4.2%), Ulm (4.4%), Cluj (5.5%), Lousanne (6.8%) and cultivar "Kończewicki" VI/4 (6.2%), which proves low sensitivity of these genotypes to water deficit and cell membrane stability. These genotypes may be used in further breeding program to improve caraway resistance to drought.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cell membrane; caraway; Carum carvi; genotype; water deficit condition; polyethylene glycol; medicinal plant

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 79
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.95-99,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Seidler-Lozykowska K

• Institute of Natural Fibers and Medical Plants, Wojska Polskiego 71B, 60-630 Poznan, Poland

autor

Bandurska H.

autor

Bocianowski J.

Bibliografia

• BANDURSKA H. GNIAZDOWSKA-SKOCZEK H. 1995. Cell membrane stability in two barley genotypes under water stress conditions. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 6:29-32.
• BLUM A. 1996. Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regul. 20:135-148.
• BLUM A. EBERCON A. 1981. Cell membrane stability as measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 21:43-47.
• BRAY E. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 2:48-54.
• CATTIVELLI L. RIZZA F. BADECK F.W. MAZZUCOTELLI E. MASTRANGELO A.M. FRANCIA E. MARE C. TON- DELLI A. STANCA A.M. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 105:1-14.
• CHAVES M.M. MAROCO J.P. PEREIRA J. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 30:239-264.
• DEXTER S.T. TOTTINGHAM W.E. GRABER L.F. 1932. Investigation of the hardiness of the plants by measurement of electrical conductivity. Plant Physiol. 7:63-78.
• DHANDA S.S. SETHI G.S. BEHL R.K. 2004. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:6-12.
• DUNCAN D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-42.
• FALCONER D.S. MACKAY T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, Essex, pp. 26-57.
• FAROOQ M. WAHID A. KOBAYASHI N. BASRA S.M.A. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:185-212.
• HALL E.H. 2001. Crop responses to environment. CRC Press LLC, New York, pp. 34-76.
• HUBAC C. GUERRIER D. FERRAN J. TREMOLIERES A. 1989. Change of lipid composition during water stress in two genotypes of Lupinus albus resistant or susceptible to drought. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 27:737-744.
• LUDLOW M.M. MUCHOW R.C. 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv. Agron. 43:107-153.
• PAYNE R., MURREY D., HARDING S., BAIRD D., SOUTOU D., LANE P. 2003. GenStat for Windows (7th edition) - Introduction. Oxford, England, VSN International.
• PHAM THI A.T. BORREL-FLOOD C. VIEIRA DA SILVA J. MAZLIAK P. 1985. Effects of water stress on lipid metabolism in cotton leaves. Phytochem. 24:723-727.
• PHAM THI A.T. VIEIRA DA SILVA J. MAZLIAK P. 1990. The role of membrane lipids in drought resistance of plants. Bull. Soc. Bot . Fr. 137:99-114.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SANEOKA H. OGATA S. 1989. Nu- tri-physiological evaluation of the polyethylene glycol test of cell membrane stability in maize. Crop Sci. 29:1287-1292.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SANEOKA H. OGATA S. 1990. Cell membrane stability, as indicator of drought tolerance, as affected by applied nitrogen and soybean. J. Agric. Sci. 115:63-66.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SHIMADA T. 1987a. The measurement of cell membrane stability using polyethylene glycol as a drought tolerance test in wheat. Japan J. Crop Sci. 3:92-97.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SHIMADA T. 1987b. Measurement of drought tolerance in orchardgrass (Dactylis gromerata L.) I. Polyethylene glycol test of measuring cell membrane stability. J. Japan. Grassl. Sci. 33:140-148.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SHIMADA T. 1987c. Measurement of drought tolerance in orchardgrass (Dactylis gromerata L.) II. Evaluation of polyethylene glycol test. J. Japan. Grassl. Sci. 33:149-156.
• PREMACHANDRA G.S. SHIMADA T. 1988. Evaluation of polyethylene glycol test of measuring cell membrane stability as a drought tolerance test in wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 110:1-5.
• RYSZKOWSKI L. FRENCH N.R. KĘDZIORA A. 1996. Dynamics of an Agricultural Landscape. PWRiL. Poznań, pp. 22-31.
• SIMON E. 1974. Phospholipids and plant membrane permeability. New Phytologist. 73:377
• PAYNE R., MURREY D., HARDING S., BAIRD D., SOUTOU D., LANE P. 2003. GenStat for Windows (7th edition) - Introduction. Oxford, England, VSN International 420.
• SULLIVAN C.Y. 1971. Technique for measuring plant drought stress. In: K.I. Larson, J.D. Eastin (ed.), Drought and Resistance in Crops, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1-18.
• SULLIVAN C.Y. ROSS W.M. 1979. Selection for drought and heat resistance in grain sorghum. In: H. Hussel, R. Staples (ed.), Stress physiology in crop plants, John Willy and sons, New York, pp. 263-281.
• TOXOPEUS H. LUBBERTS H.J. 1998. A century of breeding caraway in the Netherlands. In: E. Nemeth (ed.), Caraway. The genius Carum, Harwood Academic Publishers, London, pp. 105-128.
• WĘGLARZ Z. 1998. Production of biennial caraway for seed and essential oil. In: E. Nemeth, (ed.) Caraway. The genius Carum, Harwood Academic Publishers, London, pp. 129-140.