Influence of operational sex ratio and density on the copulatory behaviour and mating system of Brandt's vole Microtus brandti

• Autorzy: Zhang J. , Zhang Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The pattern of copulatory behaviour of Brandt's vole Microtus brandti (Radde, 1861) is similar to patterns 11 and 12 as described by Dewsbury and Dixson: no lock, single intromission, thrusting after intromission and multiple ejaculations. Under constant density, when the operational sex ratio (OSR, male to female) was skewed to the males, the mating opportunity of males decreased due to mating interference, while the mating input of female remained the same; when the OSR was skewed to the females, male voles tended to increase mating input while females did not. Under the same OSR (1:1), when density increased, the mating opportunity of both sexes dramati­cally decreased due to mating interference between same sex individuals; the thrusting frequency of males increased, probably due to compensation for the decreased mating opportunity. There was a considerable probability of the voles forming monogamous and polygynous mating relationships. Our results did not support the prediction that when OSR is skewed to male, the mating interval of males will shorten. We suggest that the most predominant mating system and mating interference should be taken into account when investigating an OSR effect. Our study suggested that the Brandt's vole is prone predominantly to monogamy and polygyny. However, due to limitation of observation in the laboratory, further work should be combined with studies in the field.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mating system; copulatory behaviour; Microtus brandti; sex ratio; vole; Brandt's vole; density

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Theriologica
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: 48
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.335-346,fig.

Twórcy

autor

Zhang J.

• Chinese Academy of Science, 25 Beisihuanxi Lu, Haindian, Beijing 100080, China

autor

Zhang Z.

Bibliografia

• Dewsbury D. A. 1972. Patterns of copulatory behavior in male mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology 47: 1–33.View ArticlePubMed
• Dewsbury D. A. 1973. Copulatory behavior of montane voles (Microtus montanus). Behavior 44: 186–202.
• Dewsbury D. A. 1975. Diversity and adaptation in rodent copulatory behavior. Science 190: 947–954.View ArticlePubMed
• Dewsbury D. A. 1982. Dominance rank, copulatory behavior and differential reproduction. The Quarterly Review of Biology 57: 135–159.View ArticlePubMed
• Dewsbury D. A. and Hartung T. G. 1982. Copulatory behavior of three species ofMicrotus. Journal of Mammalogy 63: 306–309.
• Diakow C. and Dewsbury D. A. 1978. A comparative description of the mating behavior of female rodents. Animal Behavior 26: 1091–1097.
• Dixson A. F. 1998. Primate sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–546.
• Emlen T. and Oring L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.View ArticlePubMed
• Fang J. M. and Sun R. Y. 1991. Seasonal change of space pattern of the Brandt’s vole. Acta Ecological Sinica 11(2): 111–116. [In Chinese with English summary]
• Fuentes S. M. and Dewsbury D. A. 1984. Copulatory behavior of voles (Microtus montanus andM. ochrogaster) in mutiple-female test situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology 98: 45–53.
• Getz L. L., Carter C. S. and Gavish L. 1981. The mating system of prairie voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus: Field and laboratory evidence for pair bonding. Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology 8: 189–194.
• Gray G. D. and Dewsbury D. A. 1975. A quantitive description of copulatory behavior in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanilus). Animal Behavior 23: 261–267.
• Kvarnemo C., Forsgren E. and Magnhagen C. 1995. Effects of sex ratio in intra-and inter-sexual behavior in sand gobies. Animal Behavior 50: 1455–1461.
• Lidicker W. Z. Jr 1980. The social biology of the California vole. Biologist 62: 46–55.
• Liu Z., Li Z., Liu L. and Sun R. 1994. Intensity of male reproduction in Brandt’s voleMicrotus brandti. Acta Theriologica 39: 389–397.
• Michener G. R. and McLean I. G. 1996. Reproductive behavior and operational sex ratio in Richardson’s ground squirrels. Animal Behavior 52: 743–758.
• Nelson J. 1995. Intrasexual competition and spacing behavior in male field voles,Microtus agrestis, under constant female density and spatial distribution. Oikos 73: 9–14.
• Oring L. W. 1982. Avian mating system. [In: Avian biology. D. S. Famer and J. R. King, eds]. Academic Press, New York: 1–92.
• Owens I. P. E., Burk T. and Thompson D. B. A. 1994. Extraordinary sex ratio in the Eurasian dotterel: female mating arenas, female-female competition and female mate voice. The American Naturalist 144: 76–100.
• Parker G. A. and Simmons L. W. 1996. Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: Predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, Ser. B. 263: 315–321.
• Reynolds J. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 68–72.
• Shi D. Z. 1988. A preliminary study on Brandt’s vole distribution region in China and its relation to vegetation and water-temperature conditions. Acta Theriologica Sinica 8(4): 299–306. [In Chinese with English summary]
• Shi D. Z., Wan X., Davis S., Pech R. and Zhang Z. 2002. Simulation of lethal and fertility control in a demographic model for Brandt’s voleMicrotus brandti. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 337–348.
• Wan X. R., Zhong W. Q. and Wang M. J. 1998. Ecology and management of the Brandt’s vole. [In: Ecology and management of rodent pests in agriculture. Z. B. Zhang and Z. W. Wang, eds]. Ocean Press, Beijing: 209–220. [In Chinese]
• Wang X. G. and Smith A. T. 1989. Studies on the mating system in the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae). Acta Theriologica Sinica 9(3): 210–215. [In Chinese with English summary]
• Wolff J. D. 1985. Behavior. [In: Biology of new worldMicrotus. R. H. Tamarin, ed]. Special Publication of the American Society of Mammalogists, New York: 8: 341–372.
• Xie X. M., Sun R. Y. and Fang J. M. 1994. The mating system and reproduction of Brandt’s voles (Microtus brandti). Acta Zoologica Sinica 40(3): 262–265. [In Chinese with English summary]
• Zhang Z. 2000. Mathematical models of wildlife management by contraception. Ecological Modeling 132: 105–113.
• Zhang J. and Zhong W. Q. 1981. On the colonial structure of Brandt’s vole in burrow units. Acta Theriologica Sinica 1(1): 51–56. [In Chinese with English summary]