Humoral response and changes in IL-2 receptor's expression after immunisation of piglets with maternal antibodies against Aujeszky's disease

• Autorzy: Markowska-Daniel I , Pomorska-Mol M. , Bednarek D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was the evaluation of immunological response of piglets born from sows immunised with ADV live vaccine and defining the optimal time for their active immunisation. Two weeks after the final vaccination, there were no differences in the level of serum gB antibodies among the sows and all the sows developed humoural immunity. Maternally derived antibodies (MDA) in the sera of all piglets were above the level considered to be positive until about 11 weeks of their life. Following exposure to the live ADV, a greater number of lymphocytes (including CD2⁺ and CD2⁻ cells) from vaccinated animals expressed the IL-2 receptor (CD25), than those from unvaccinated ones. After virus stimulation, there were also higher expression of CD25 on CD8⁺ T cells in all vaccinated animals, while in non-vaccinated pigs; a decrease in such expression was evident. Based on the obtained results it might be stated that the piglet vaccination against AD at 10 and 14 weeks of life was considered to be optimal. In this age, the animals were still protected by passive immunity, but simultaneously were able to develop an active humoural response. It could be also concluded that the high level of MDA may successfully blocked the developmental of active immunity.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

animal disease; pig; Aujeszky's disease; Aujeszky's disease virus; immunization; maternal antibody; piglet; active immunity; vaccine

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 53
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.169-174,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Markowska-Daniel I

• National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland

autor

Pomorska-Mol M.

autor

Bednarek D.

Bibliografia

• 1. Bouma A., De Jong M.C.M., Kimman T.G.: The influence of maternal immunity on the transmission of pseudorabies virus and on the effectiveness of vaccination. Vaccine 1997, 15, 287-294.
• 2. Brukman A., Enquist L.W.: Suppresion of the interferon- mediated innate immune response by pseudorabies virus. J Virol 2006, 13, 6345-6356.
• 3. Casal J., Planasdemunt L., Varo J.A., Martin M.: The use of different vaccination schedules for sows to protect piglets against Aujeszky's disease. J Vet Med B 2004, 51, 8-11.
• 4. Endsley J.J., Roth J.A., Ridpath J., Neill J.: Maternal antibody blocks humoral but not T cell responses to BVDV. Biologicals 2003, 31, 123-125.
• 5. Fischer T., Buttner M., Rzitha H.J.: T helper-1 type cytokine transcription in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of pseudorabies virus (Suid herpesvirus l)-primed swine indicates efficient immunization. Immunology 2000, 101, 378-387.
• 6. Gutekunst D.E., Pirtle E.C.: Humoral and cellular immune responses in swine after vaccination with inactivated pseudorabies virus. Am J Vet Res 1979, 40, 1343-1346.
• 7. Mattenleiter T.C.: Immunobiology of pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease). Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1996, 54, 221-229.
• 8. McFerran J.B., Dow C.: Studies on immunization of pigs with the bartha strain of Aujeszky's disease virus. Res Vet Sci 1975, 19, 17-22.
• 9. Miniami Y., Kono T., Miyazaki T., Taniguchi T.: The IL-2 receptor complex: its structure, function and target genes. Annu Rev Immunol 1993, 11, 245-267.
• 10. Quade M.J., Roth J.A.: Antigen-specific in vitro activation of T-lymphocyte subsets of cattle immunized with a modified live bovine herpes virus 1 vaccine. Viral Immunol 1999, 12, 9-12.
• 11. Slifka M.K., Whitton J.L.: Antigen-specific regulation of T cell-mediated cytokine production. Immunity 200, 12, 451-457.
• 12. Smita A., Ghanekar L., Laurel, E., Nomura A., Suni L., Louis J. Picker H., Maecker L., Vernon C.: Gamma interferon expression in CD81 T cells is a marker for circulating cytotoxic T lymphocytes that recognize an hla a2-restricted epitope of human cytomegalovirus phosphoprotein pp65. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2001, 8, 628-631.
• 13. Suradhat S., Sada W., Buranapradikun S., Damrongwatanapokin S.: The kinetics of cytokine production and CD25 expression by porcine lymphocyte subpopulation following exposure to classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2005, 106, 197-208.
• 14. Vannier P.: Vaccination against Aujeszky's disease by different routes using live attenuated and inactivated virus vaccines in pigs with or without passive immunity. J Vet Med B 1986, 33, 704-712.
• 15. William L.M., Pirtle E.C.: Sequential changes in the humoral immune response of pigs to pseudorabies virus after vaccination, exposure to virulent virus, and reactivation of latent virus. J Vet Diagn Invest 1990, 2, 35-43.
• 16. Wittman G.: Die Beeintrachtigung der Schutzimpfung von saugferkeln mit inaktivierter Aujeszky-Vakzine durch kolostrale immunitat. Tierarzt Umschau 1981, 36, 523-528.