Zastosowanie metod biologii molekularnej w diagnostyce bakteryjnych chorob roslin

• Autorzy: Pulawska J , Sobiczewski P.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Recent years have seen a great increase of interest in application of molecular biology methods (hybridization of nucleic acids, polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction) in the diagnostics of plant bacterial diseases. These methods are incomparably more sensitive than the traditional and the serological ones, thus making possible detection and correct identification of even low number of bacteria and, what 18 most important, results are obtainable in a significantly shorter time - even in a few hours. The paper reviews the most recent literature concerning applications of molecular methods to detection of bacteria belonging to genus: Agrobacterium, Clavibacter, Erwinia, Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas. A serious disadvantage of these methods is their high cost resulting from the need for expensive laboratory equipment and chemicals. Another drawback is the use of hazardous materials such as ethidium bromide (PCR) and radioactive isotopes (hybridization, LCR). Nevertheless, the molecular methods are more and more commonly used in phytopathological laboratories, especially in those examining quarantine objects. They are particularly useful as an assisting tool when results of traditional and serological tests are equivocal.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

choroby roslin; choroby bakteryjne; hybrydyzacja kwasow nukleinowych; lancuchowa reakcja ligazy; diagnostyka; metody molekularne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Postępy Nauk Rolniczych
• Rocznik: 1997
• Tom: 44
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: s.73-96,rys.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Pulawska J

• Instytut Sadownictwa i Kwiaciarstwa, Skierniewice

autor

Sobiczewski P.

Bibliografia

• [1] Backman K.C., Carrino J.J., Bond S.B., Laftler T.G. 1991. Improved method of amplifying target nucleic acids applicable to both polymerase and ligase chain reaction. European Patent Office Publication 0 439 182 A2.
• [2] Bereswill S., Pahl A., Belleman P., Zeller W., Geider K. 1992. Sensitive and species-specific detection of Erwinia amylovora by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 3522-3526.
• [3] Bereswill S., Bugert P., Bruchmüller I., Geider K. 1995. Identification of the fire blight pathogen E. amylovora, by PCR assay with chromosomal DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 2636-2642.
• [4]Berthier Y., Thierry O., Lemattre M., Guesdon J.-L. 1994. Isolation of an insertion sequence (IS1051) from Xanthomonas campesris pv. dieffenbachiae with potential use for strain identification and characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 377-384.
• [4a] Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M., Davis R.W. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32: 314-331.
• [5] Darrasse A., Piou S., Kotoujansky A., Bertheau Y. 1994. PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism of a pel gene as a tool to identify Erwinia carotovora in relation to potato diseases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1437-1443.
• [6] De Boer S.H., Ward L.J. 1995. PCR detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica associated with potato tissue. Phytopathology 85: 854-858.
• [7] Dreier J., Bermpohl A., Eischenlaub R. 1995. Southern hybridization and PCR for specific detection [S] of phytopathogenic Clavi bacter michiganensissubsp. michiganensis. Phytopathology. 85: 462-468.
• [8] Dang L. -C., Sun C.-W., Thies K.L., Luthe D.S., Graves C.H. Jr. 1992. Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect pathogenic strains of Agrobacterium. Phytopathology 82: 434-439.
• [9] Drennan J.L., Westra A.A.G., Slack S.A., Collmer A., Gudmestad N.C., Oleson A.E. 1993. Comparison of DNA Hybridization Probe and ELISA for the Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in Field-Grown Potatoes. Plant Dis. 77: 1243-1247.
• [10] Eastwell K.C., Willis L.G., Cavileer T.D 1995. A Rapid and Sensitive Method to Detect Agrobacterium vitis in Grapevine Cuttings Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Plant Dis. 79: 822-827.
• [11] Firraro, G. 1990. Cloned diagnostic probe for detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus. EPPO Bull. 20: 207-213.
• [12] Haas J.H., Moore L.W., Ream W. 1995. Universal PCR primers for detection of phytopathogenic Agrobacterium strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 2879-2884.
• [13] Hu X., Lai F.-M., Reddy A.S.N., Ishimaru C.A. 1995. Quantitative detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 85: 1468-1473.
• [14] Karjalainen R., Kangasniemi A., Hämäläinen J., Tegel J. 1995. Evaluation of PCR methods for the diagnosis of bacterial ring rot infections in potato. EPPO Bulletin 25: 169-175.
• [15] Li X., De Boer S.H. 1995. Selection of polymerase chain reaction primers from an RNA intergenic spacer region for specific detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus. Phytopathology 85: 837-842.
• [16] Leite R.P.JR, Minsavage G.V., Bonas U., Stall R.E. 1994. Detection and identification of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas strains by amplification of DNA sequences related to the hrp genes of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1068-1077.
• [17] Maes M. 1993. Fast classification of plant-associated bacteria in the Xanthomonas genus. FEMS Mcrobiol. Lett. 113: 161-166.
• [18] Maes M., Garbeva P. 1994. Detection of bacterial phytopathogenes based on nucleic acid technology. Parasitica 50: 75-80.
• [19] Maes M., Garbeva P. 1995. Development of a PCR-based detection method for Xanthomonas campestris pv. translucens. EPPO Bulletin 25: 203-209.
• [20] Manulis S., Valinsky L., Lichter A., Gabriel D.W. 1994. Sensitive and specific detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pelargonii with DNA primers and probes identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 4094-4099.
• [21] McManus P.S.,Jones A.L.1995. Detection of Erwinia amylovora by nested PCR and PCR-dot-blot and reverse-blot hybridizations. Phytopathology 85: 618-623.
• [22] Mogen B.D., Olson H.R., Sparks R.B., Gudmestad N.C., Oleson A.E. 1990. Genetic variation in strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicum: Polymorphisms in restriction fragments containing a highly repeated sequence. Phytopathology 80: 90-96.
• [23] Nesme X., Ledere M.C., Bardin R. 1990. PCR detection of an original endosymbiont: the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. s. 47-50 W P. Nardon, V. Gianinazzi-Pearson, A.M. Greinier, L. Margulis, D.Smith "Endocytobiology" Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.
• [24] Picard C., Ponsonnet C., Paget E., Nesme X., Simonet P. 1992. Detection and enumeration of bacteria in soil by direct DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 2717-2722.
• [25] Picard C., Ponsonnet C., Recorbet G., Antonelli F., Simonet P., Nesme X. Detection of pathogenic Agrobacterium in soils by PCR (niepublikowane).
• [25a] Puławska J. Detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in soil using PCR. Abstracts of European Foundation of Plant Pathology 4th International Symposium 9-12.09.1996 Bonn, Niemcy C-17,
• [26] Prosen D., Hatziloukas E., Shaad N.W., Panopoulos N.J. 1993. Specific detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola DNA in bean seed by polymerase chain reaction based amplification ofa phaseolotoxin gene region. Phytopathology 83: 965-970.
• [27] Saiki R.K., Gelfand D.H., Stoffel S., Scharf S.J., Higuchi R., Horn G.T., Mullis K.B., Erlich HA 1988. Primer directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487-491.
• [28] Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F., ManiatisT. 1989. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Press.
• [29] Sawada H., Ieki H., Matsuda I. 1995. PCR detection of Ti and Ri Plasmids from phytopathogenic Agrobacterium strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 828-831.
• [30] Sawada H., Oyaizu H., Matsumoto S. 1992. Differentiation of Agrobacterium taxa based on partial sequences of 16S rRNA. Ann. Phytopath.Soc. Japan 58: 761-765.
• [31] Seal S.E., Jackson L.A., Daniels M.J. 1992. Isolation of a Pseudomonas solanacearum – specific DNA probe by subtraction hybridization and construction of species-specific oligonucleotide primers for sensitive detection by the polymerase chain reaction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 3751-3758.
• [32] Seal S.E. 1995. PCR-based detection and characterization of Pseudomonas solanacearum for use in less developed countries. EPPO Bulletin 25: 227-231.
• [33] Shaad N.W., Azad H., Peet R.C., Panopoulos N.J. 1989. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola by a DNA hybridization probe. Phytopathology 79: 903-907.
• [34] Shaad N.W., Cheong S.S., Tamaki S., Hatziloukas E., Panopoulos N.J. 1995. A combined biological and enzymatic amplification (BIO-PCR) technique to detect Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola in bean seed extracts. Phytopathology 85: 243-248.
• [35] Smith J.J., Offord L.C., Holderness M., Saddler G.S. 1995. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of Pseudomonas solanacearum. EPPO Bulletin 25: 163-167.
• [36] Sulzinski M.A., Moorman G.W., Schlagnhaufer B., Romaine C.P. 1995. Fingerprinting of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pelargonii and related pathovars using random-primed PCR. J. Phytopathology 143: 429-433.
• [37] Vauterin L., Hoste B., Kersters K., Swings J. 1995. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Intern. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 472-489.
• [38] Ward L.J., De Boer S.H. 1994. Specific detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica with digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe. Phytopathology 84: 180-186.
• [38a] Welsch J., McClelland M. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 7213-7218.
• [39] Wilson W.J., Wiedmann M., Dillard H.R., Batt C.A. 1994. Identification of Erwinia stewartii by ligase chain reaction assay. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 60: 278-284.