Radiograficzny obraz zmian agresywnych w kosci

• Autorzy: Komsta R

Warianty tytułu

EN

Radiographic imaging of aggressive change in bones

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The term “aggressive change” has been applied in radiology to describe pathological processes that are characterized by a violent and rapid development, connected with a very weak or even no reaction from the organism. Basic radiographic features that can decide whether the character of the process developing in bones is aggressive are: extraosseous extension/soft tissue mass, periosteal reaction, lesion margin, bone destruction, or rate of change. In this article the rules of interpretation concerning changes that have been noticed on the radiograph have been presented, without delving into the details of establishing the diagnosis of diseases. The degree of aggressiveness of individual radiographic features of abnormal bone tissue can occur differently. They should always be taken into consideration together. Yet those features which indicate a more aggressive character of the pathological process are deigned to be more important.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

radiologia; badania radiologiczne; kosci; zmiany patologiczne; zmiany agresywne; stopien agresywnosci guza; interpretacja wynikow

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 65
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.670-673,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Komsta R

• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Gleboka 30, 20-612 Lublin

Bibliografia

• 1.Barr F. J., Kirbrger R. M.: BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Imaging. BSAVA, Gloucester 2006, s. 11-18.
• 2.Kricun M. E.: Radiographic evaluation of solitary bone lesions. Orthop. Clin. North. Am 1983, 14, 39-64.
• 3.Lachman E.: Osteoporosis: the potentialities and limitations of its roentgenologic diagnosis. Am. J. Roentgen. 1955, 74, 712-715.
• 4.Levine M. S., Lambiase R. E., Petchprapa C. N.: Cortical lesions of the tibia: characteristic appearances at conventional radiography. Radio Graphies 2003, 23, 157-177.
• 5.Lodwick G. S.: Reactive response to local injury in bone. Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 1964, 2, 209-219.
• 6.Lodwick G. S., Wilson A. J., Farrel C., Virtama P., Dittrich F.: Determing growth rates of focal lesions of bone from radiographs. Radiology 1980, 134, 577-583.
• 7.Madewell J. E., Ragsdale B. D., Sweet D. E.: Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. I. Internal margins. Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 1981, 19, 715-748.
• 8.Miller T. T.: Bone tumors and tumor-like conditions: analysis conventional radiography. Radiology 2008, 246, 662-674.
• 9.Morgan J. P.: Radiology of Veterinary Orthopedics. Features of Diagnosis. Venture Press, California 1999, s. 82-167.
• 10.O'Donnel P.: Evaluation of focal bone lesions: basic principles and clinical scenarios. Imaging 2003, 15, 298-323.
• 11.Park R. D.: Radiographic diagnosis of long bone neoplasmas in the dog. Comp. Contin. Ed. Vet. Pract. 1981, 3, 922.
• 12.Priolo F., Cerase A.: The current role of radiography in the assessment of skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions. Eur. J. Radiol. 1998, 27 (supl.), 77-85.
• 13.Ragsdale B. D., Madewlee J. E., Sweet D. E.: Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. II. Perioseal reactions. Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 1981, 19, 749-783.
• 14.Sanders T. G., Parsons T. W.: Radiographic imaging of musculoskeletal neoplasia. Cancer Control 2001, 8, 221-231.
• 15.Santos L. A.: The radiology of bone tumors: old and new modalities. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 1980, 30, 66-91.
• 16.Wrigley R. H.: Malignant versus non-malignant bone disease. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2000, 30, 315-347.