Praktyczne znaczenie oceny behawioru w aspekcie dobrostanu i produkcyjności bydła

• Autorzy: Budzynska M. , Kamieniak J. , Marko D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Practical importance of behaviour assessment with regard to welfare and productivity of cattle

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this review was to present the basic issues concerning the assessment of behaviour traits in cattle, including its practical importance for the welfare and productivity of these animals. The study reviews the main areas of research in the applied ethology of cattle, emphasizing the relationships between behaviour and productivity traits. It provides examples of studies devoted to these relationships in milk cattle and meat cattle, as well as suggests some means of improving cattle welfare. The growing interest in the applied ethology of cattle in recent decades may significantly increase our knowledge of the behaviour traits of this species, which can also be applied in practice. The development and improvement of methods for the assessment of cattle behaviour facilitates the interpretation of behavioural responses observed in these animals, which makes for an easier and safer human interaction with them. Observation of animal behaviour may also facilitate detection of diseases. The methods of assessing temperamental traits become particularly important when such traits are used as selection indicators.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

hodowla zwierzat; bydlo; dobrostan zwierzat; produkcyjnosc zwierzat; zachowanie sie zwierzat; cechy behawioralne; ocena zachowan; metody oceny; testy behawioralne; etologia stosowana; aspekty praktyczne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 75
• Numer: 07
• Opis fizyczny: s.416-421,rys.,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Budzynska M.

• Zakład Etologii Zwierząt, Katedra Etologii i Dobrostanu Zwierząt, Wydział Biologii, Nauk o Zwierzętach i Biogospodarki, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Kamieniak J.

• Zakład Etologii Zwierząt, Katedra Etologii i Dobrostanu Zwierząt, Wydział Biologii, Nauk o Zwierzętach i Biogospodarki, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul.Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin

autor

Marko D.

• Powiatowy Inspektorat Weterynarii w Parczewie, ul.Piwonia 50, 21-200 Parczew

Bibliografia

• Abramowicz P., Brzozowski P., Gołębiewski M.: Praktyczne aspekty społecznych zachowań bydła. Med. Weter. 2014, 70, 2, 90-93.
• Botreau R., Veissier I., Butterworth A., Bracke M. B. M., Kesling L. J.: Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16, 225-228.
• Broom D. M.: Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J. 1986, 142, 524-526.
• Budzyńska M.: Naukowe i edukacyjne aspekty etologii stosowanej. Prz. Hod. 2011, 12, 22-23.
• Budzyńska M.: Współczesne zagadnienia w badaniach i nauczaniu dobrostanu zwierząt. Wiad. Zoot. 2015, 1, 58-64.
• Budzyńska M., Krupa W., Tietze M.: Behawior krów w hali udojowej. Med. Weter. 2007, 63, 11, 1363-1365.
• Budzyńska M., Weary D. M.: Weaning distress in dairy calves: Effects of alternative weaning procedures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 112, 33-39.
• Cramer M. C., Stanton A. L.: Associations between health status and the probability of approaching a novel object or stationary human in preweaned group-housed dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 7298-7308.
• Cziszter L. T., Gavojdian D., Neamt R., Neciu F., Kusza S., Ilie D. E.: Effects of temperament on production and reproductive performance in Simmental dual-purpose cows. J. Vet. Behav. 2016, 15, 50-55.
• Ebinghaus A., Ivemeyer S., Rupp J., Knierim U.: Identification and measures suitable as potential breeding traits regarding dairy cows’ reactivity towards humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 185, 30-38.
• Fahim A., Kamboj L. M., Bhakat M., Mohanty T. K., Gupta R.: Preference of side and standing in relationship with milking characteristics and temperament score of crossbred dairy cows in an 8 × 2 herringbone milking parlour. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2018, 42, 49-54.
• Flower F. C., Weary D. M.: Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. 2. Separation at 1 day and 2 weeks after birth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 70, 275-284.
• Forkman B., Boissy A., Meunier-Salaün M. C., Canali E., Jones R. B.: A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 91, 531-565.
• Fraser A. F., Broom D. M.: Farm animal behaviour and welfare. Bailliere Tindall London 1990.
• Guliński P., Salamończyk E., Młynek K.: Okołożywieniowe zachowanie bydła mlecznego. Wiad. Zoot. 2014, 2, 57-69.
• Haba R., Shintani N., Onaka Y., Wang H., Takenaga R., Hayata A., Baba A., Hashimoto H.: Lipopolysaccharide affects exploratory behaviors towards novel objects by impairing cognition and/or motivation in mice; possible role of activation of the central amygdala. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 228, 423-431.
• Hall C. S.: Emotional behaviour in the rat: Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. J. Comp. Psychol. 1934, 18, 385-403.
• Hall N. L., Buchanan D. S., Anderson V. L., Ilse B. R., Carlin K. R., Berg E. P.: Working chute behavior of feedlot cattle can be an indication of cattle temperament and beef carcass composition and quality. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 52-57.
• Halo M., Strapak P., Holly A., Mlynekova E., Kovalcik E., Horny M.: Influence of stress on the training process of the horses. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2008, 9, 217-224.
• Hart B. L.: Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1988, 12, 123-137.
• Haskell M. J., Simm G., Turner S. P.: Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 1-18.
• Hemsworth P. H., Coleman G. J., Burnett J. L., Borg S.: Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 2821-2831.
• Herskin M. S., Kristensen A.-M., Munksgaard L.: Behavioural responses of dairy cows toward novel stimuli presented in the home environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 89, 27-40.
• Jasper J., Budzyńska M., Weary D. M.: Weaning distress in dairy calves: Acute behavioural responses by limit-fed calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 136-143.
• Jensen M. B., Kyhn R.: Play behaviour in group-housed dairy calves, the effect of space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 67, 35-46.
• Jezierski T.: Aktualne zagadnienia etologii stosowanej. Kosmos 1996, 45, 583-592.
• Kosako T., Fukasawa M., Kohari D., Oikawa K., Tsukada H.: The effect of approach direction and pace on flight distance of beef breeding cows. Anim. Sci. J. 2008, 79, 722-726.
• Kunowska-Slósarz M., Slósarz J.: Znaczenie temperamentu w hodowli bydła mięsnego. Med. Weter. 2008, 64, 20-23.
• Leme T. M. C., Titto E. A. L., Titto C. G., Pereira A. M. F., Neto M. C.: Influence of stocking density on weight gain and behavior of feedlot lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 115, 1-6.
• Lensink B. J., Fernandez X., Boivin X., Pradel P., Le neeindre P., Veisser I.: The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 1219-1226.
• Lidfors L. M.: Behavioural effects of separating the dairy calves immediately or 4 days post-partum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 49, 269-283.
• Mason G. J.: Stereotypies: critical review. Anim. Behav. 1991, 41, 1015-1037.
• Munksgaard I., de Passillé A. M., Rushen J., Ladewig J.: Dairy cows’ use of colour cues to discriminate between people. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 65, 1-11.
• Neja W., Sawa A., Kiedrowicz M.: Zachowanie się krów podczas zajmowania stanowisk w hali udojowej. Rocz. Nauk. Pol. Tow. Zoot. 2006, 2, 127-132.
• Orban M., Gaal K. K., Pajor F., Szentleleki A., Poti P., Tzosér J., Gulyas L.: Effect of temperament of Jersey and Holstein Fresian cows on milk production traits and somatic cel count. Arch. Tier. 2011, 54, 594-599.
• Paranhos da Costa M. J. R., Broom D. M.: Consistency of side choice in the milking parlour by Holstein-Fresian cows and its relationship with their reactivity and milk yield. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 70, 177-186.
• Passillé A. M. de, Rushen J., Martin F.: Interpreting the behaviour of calves in an open-field test: a factor analysis. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995, 45, 201-213.
• Petrynka M., Klocek C.: Wpływ relacji człowiek–zwierzę na dobrostan i produkcyjnośćzwierząt. Med. Weter. 2012, 68, 479-482.
• Redbo I.: Relations between oral stereotypies, open-field behavior and pituitary-adrenal system in growing dairy cattle. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 64, 273-278.
• Rousing T., Bonde M., Badsberg J. H., Sorensen J. T.: Stepping and kicking behaviour during milking in relation to response in human-animal interaction tests and clinical health in loose housed dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 88, 1-8.
• Rushen J., Munksgaard I., de Passillé A. M., Jensen M. B., Thodberg K.: Location of handling and dairy cows’ responses to people. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 55, 259-267.
• Sandem A. I., Janczak A. M., Braastad B. O.: A short note on effects of exposure to a novel stimulus (umbrella) on behaviour and percentage of eye-white in cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 89, 309-314.
• Sebastian T., Watts J. M., Stookey J. M., Buchanan F., Waldner C.: Temperament in beef cattle: Methods of measurement and their relation to production. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 91, 557-565.
• Stechulova I., Lidfors L., Spinka M.: Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: Effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 144-165.
• Sutherland M. A., Rogers A. R., Werkerk G. A.: The effect of temperament and responsiveness towards humans on the behavior, physiology and milk production of multi-parous dairy cows in a familiar and novel milking environment. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 107, 329-337.
• Szentleleki A., Nagy K., Szeplaki K., Kekesi K., Tzὂsér J.: Behavioural responses of primiparous and multiparous dairy cows to the milking process over an entire lactation. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015, 15, 185-195.
• Titto E. A. L., Titto C. G., Gatto E. G., Noronha C. M. S., Mourao G. B., Filho J. K. M. N., Pereira A. M. F.: Reactivity of Nellore steers in two feedlot housing systems and its relationship with plasmatic cortisol. Livest. Sci. 2010, 129, 146-150.
• Uetake K., Morita S., Hoshiba S., Tanaka T.: Flight distance of dairy cows and its relationship to daily routine management procedures and productivity. Anim. Sci. J. 2002, 73, 279-285.
• Vetters M. D. D., Engle T. E., Ahola J. K., Grandin T.: Comparison of flight speed and exit score as measurements of temperament in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 374-381.
• Waiblinger S., Menke C., Korff J., Bucher A.: Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 85, 31-42.
• Weary D. M., Chua B.: Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. 1. Separation at 6 h, 1 day and 4 days after birth. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 69, 177-188.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21521/mw.6177