Pulsatilla patens (Ranunculaceae), a perennial herb, is ectomycorrhizal in northeastern Poland and likely shares ectomycorrhizal fungi with Pinus sylvestris

• Autorzy: Hoeksema J. , Roy M. , Laska G. , Sienkiewicz A. , Horning A. , Abbott M.J. , Tran C. , Mattox J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The sharing of species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) among different co-occurring host plant species could allow the formation of common mycorrhizal networks, which can alter plant–plant interactions and succession. Such sharing of EMF among woody species is thought to be common in many forests, but very few herbaceous plants form EMF, so they are assumed to be excluded from EMF networks in forests. We studied the EMF on roots of a common coniferous tree, Pinus sylvestris, and a co-occurring rare herbaceous perennial plant, Pulsatilla patens (Ranunculaceae), in northeastern Poland. We examined roots from co-occuring P. sylvestris and P. patens, visually classified EMF into morphotypes, studied tissue sections of mycorrhizal structures using compound microscopy, and used DNA sequencing to identify the fungi. On both host plant species, we observed EMF colonization, with colonized root tips exhibiting a swollen appearance, as well as a variety of colors and textures of fungal mycelium covering and emanating from those swollen tips. Sectioning and microscopic examination of an EMF morphotype common on P. patens confirmed the presence of a mantle and Hartig net, indicating the likely presence of functional ectomycorrhizal structures. The two most frequent EMF were Cenococcum geophilum and Piloderma olivaceum, and the latter was found to associate with both host plant species. Several EMF found here only on P. patens, including C. geophilum and two Russula species, are known from previous studies to also associate with P. sylvestris and other tree species. The observation of shared EMF between a coniferous tree and an understory herb indicates the potential for common mycorrhizal networks to alter interactions between these two species and may also indicate a unique way in which the distribution and abundance of a rare herbaceous plant may be influenced by shared mutualisms with a common co-occurring woody plant.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 87
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: Article 3572 [13p.],fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hoeksema J.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

autor

Roy M.

• Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Batiment 4R1, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex 9, France

autor

Laska G.

• Department of Environmental Protection and Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

autor

Sienkiewicz A.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

autor

Horning A.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

autor

Abbott M.J.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

autor

Tran C.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

autor

Mattox J.

• Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848 University, Mississippi 38677, United States

Bibliografia

• 1. Bever JD. Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: Conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytol. 2003;157:465–473. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x
• 2. Bever JD, Richardson SC, Lawrence BM, Holmes J, Watson M. Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. Ecol Lett. 2009;12(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01254.x
• 3. Newman EI. Mycorrhizal links between plants – their functioning and ecological significance. Adv Ecol Res. 1988;18:243–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60182-8
• 4. Selosse MA, Richard F, He XH, Simard SW. Mycorrhizal networks: des liaisons dangereuses? Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21(11):621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.003
• 5. Molina R, Horton TR. Mycorrhiza specificity: its role in the development and function of common mycelial networks. In: Horton T, editor. Mycorrhizal networks. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 1–39. (Ecological Studies; vol 224). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_1
• 6. Molina R, Massicotte HB, Trappe JM. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community-ecological consequences and practical implications. In: Allen MF, editor. Mycorrhizal functioning: an integrative plant–fungal process. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1992. p. 357–423.
• 7. Horton TR, Bruns TD. Multiple-host fungi are the most frequent and abundant ectomycorrhizal types in a mixed stand of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and bishop pine (Pinus muricata). New Phytol. 1998;139(2):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00185.x
• 8. Read DJ, Leake JR, Perez-Moreno J. Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes. Can J Bot. 2004;82(8):1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-123
• 9. Simard SW, Durall DM. Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance. Can J Bot. 2004;82(8):1140–1165. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-116
• 10. Hoeksema JD. Experimentally testing effects of mycorrhizal networks on plant–plant interactions and distinguishing among mechanisms. In: Horton TR, editor. Mycorrhizal networks. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 255–277. (Ecological Studies; vol 224). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7395-9_9
• 11. Roy M, Yagame T, Yamato M, Iwase K, Heinz C, Faccio A, et al. Ectomycorrhizal Inocybe species associate with the mycoheterotrophic orchid Epipogium aphyllum but not its asexual propagules. Ann Bot. 2009;104(3):595–610. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn269
• 12. Hynson NA, Madsen TP, Selosse MA, Adam IKU, Ogura-Tsujita Y, Roy M, et al. The physiological ecology of mycoheterotrophy. In: Merckx V, editor. Mycoheterotrophy. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 297–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5209-6_8
• 13. Selosse MA, Roy M. Green plants that feed on fungi: facts and questions about mixotrophy. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.004
• 14. Meusel H, Jäger E, Weinert E. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. 1. Karten. Jena: Fischer Verl.; 1965.
• 15. Aichele D, Schwegler HW. Die Taxonomie der Gattung Pulsatilla. Feddes Repert. 1957;60:1–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.19570600103
• 16. Gibbons B, Brought P. Atlas roślin Europy Północnej i Środkowej. Warszawa: MULTICO Oficyna Wydawnicza; 1995.
• 17. Szwedler I, Sobkowiak M. Spotkania z przyrodą – rośliny. Warszawa: MULTICO Oficyna Wydawnicza; 1998.
• 18. Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Mirek Z. Flora Polski – atlas roślin chronionych. Warszawa: MULTICO Oficyna Wydawnicza; 2003.
• 19. European Communities. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union. 2004;206:7–50.
• 20. Council of Europe. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats. Bern: Council of Europe; 1979.
• 21. Holub J, Procházka F. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic – 2000. Preslia. 2000;72:187–230.
• 22. Ludwig G, Schnittler M, editors. Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz; 1996.
• 23. Röder D, Kiehl K. Population structure and population dynamic of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. in relation to vegetation characteristics. Flora. 2006;201:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.11.001
• 24. Ingelög T, Andersson R, Tjernberg M. Red data book of the Baltic region. Part 1. Lists of threatened vascular plants and vertebrates. Riga: Swedish Threatened Species unit, Uppsala in co-operation with the Institute of Biology; 1993.
• 25. Gärdenfors U. Population viability analysis in the classification of threatened species: problems and potentials. Ecol Bull. 2000;48:181–190.
• 26. Průša D, Eliáš MLP, Dítě D, Čačko L, Krása P, Podešva Z. Chránené rastliny Českej a Slovenskej republiky. Brno: Computer Press; 2005.
• 27. Noskov GA, editor. Red data book of nature of Leningrad Region. Vol. 2. Plants and fungi. St. Petersburg: World & Family; 2000.
• 28. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 9 października 2014 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej roślin. Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland (Dziennik Ustaw), 2014 Oct 9, Item 1409.
• 29. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 16 maja 2005 roku w sprawie typów siedlisk przyrodniczych oraz gatunków roślin i zwierząt, wymagających ochrony w formie wyznaczania obszarów Natura 2000. Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland (Dziennik Ustaw), 2005 May 16, Item 795.
• 30. Zarzycki K, Szeląg Z. Red list of vascular plants in Poland. In: Mirek Z, Zarzycki K, Wojewoda W, Szeląg Z, editors. Red list of plants and fungi in Poland. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2006.
• 31. Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, editors. The red data book of the Polish Carpathians. Vascular plants. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2008.
• 32. Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K, Mirek Z. Red data book of Poland. Pteridophytes and flowering plants. 3rd ed. Cracow: Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2014.
• 33. Żukowski W, Jackowiak B. Ginące i zagrożone rośliny naczyniowe Pomorza Zachodniego i Wielkopolski. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 1995. (Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; vol 3).
• 34. Podgórska M, Bróż E. Wymieranie stanowisk sasanki otwartej Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. subsp. patens na Wyżynie Małopolskiej. In: Szczepkowski A, Obidziński A, editors. Proceedings of the LV Meeting of the Polish Botanical Society: “Planta in vivo, in vitro et in silico”. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Botaniczne; 2010. p. 61.
• 35. Parusel JB. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych Górnego Śląska. Katowice: Centrum Dziedzictwa Przyrodniczego Górnego Śląska; 1996.
• 36. Nowak T, Tokarska-Guzik B, Chmura D. Materiały do atlasu rozmieszczenia oraz stanu zasobów roślin chronionych i zagrożonych rejonu Górnośląskiego. Część 7. Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. (Ranunculaceae). Acta Biologica Silesiana. 2000;35:191–199.
• 37. Nowak A, Spałek K. Czerwona księga roślin województwa Opolskiego. Rośliny naczyniowe wymarłe, zagrożone i rzadkie. Opole: Polskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk; 2002.
• 38. Kącki Z, editor. Zagrożone gatunki flory naczyniowej Dolnego Śląska. Wrocław: Instytut Biologii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Tow. Przyjaciół Przyrody “Pro Natura”; 2003.
• 39. Horton TR, Cazares E, Bruns TD. Ectomycorrhizal, vesicular-arbuscular and dark septate fungal colonization of bishop pine (Pinus muricata) seedlings in the first 5 months of growth after wildfire. Mycorrhiza. 1998;8(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050205
• 40. Jonsson L, Dahlberg A, Nilsson MC, Karen O, Zackrisson O. Continuity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in self-regenerating boreal Pinus sylvestris forests studied by comparing mycobiont diversity on seedlings and mature trees. New Phytol. 1999;142(1):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00383.x
• 41. Anderson IC, Campbell CD, Prosser JI. Diversity of fungi in organic soils under a moorland-Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) gradient. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5(11):1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00522.x
• 42. Bonet JA, Fischer CR, Colinas C. The relationship between forest age and aspect on the production of sporocarps of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pinus sylvestris forests of the central Pyrenees. For Ecol Manage. 2004;203(1):157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.063
• 43. Łaska G. Dynamic tendencies of the secondary communities in the Knyszyńska Forest. Białystok: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 2006.
• 44. Łaska G. Europejska sieć ekologiczna Natura 2000 a ocena oddziaływania na środowisko przyrodnicze. In: Łaska G, editor. Ochrona środowiska. Perspektywy i strategie rozwoju gospodarczego Puszczy Knyszyńskiej oraz ochrona przyrody na Litwie. Białystok: Stowarzyszenie Uroczysko; 2009. p. 51–68.
• 45. Górniak A. Klimat województwa podlaskiego. Białystok: Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej; 2000.
• 46. Łaska G, Sienkiewicz A. Eastern pasqueflower Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. in the Knyszyńska Forest. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2010;79(suppl):46–47.
• 47. Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2001.
• 48. Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 1).
• 49. Ochyra R, Żarnowiec J, Bednarek-Ochyra H. Cenzus catalogue of Polish mosses. Cracow: Polish Academy of Sciences; 2003.
• 50. Łaska G, Sienkiewicz A. Mathematical modelling of the influence of air temperature on the conservation status and threat of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. population in the Knyszyńska Forest. Episteme. Czasopismo Naukowo-Kulturalne. 2014;22(2):173–179.
• 51. Łaska G, Sienkiewicz A. Mathematical modeling of the relationship between the trophism of upper soil layers and properties of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. population in the Knyszyńska Forest. Episteme. Czasopismo Naukowo-Kulturalne. 2015;26:289–296.
• 52. Agerer R. Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycol Prog. 2006;5(2):67–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0505-x
• 53. Kõljalg U, Larsson KH, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, et al. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2005;166(3):1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x
• 54. Zhang L, Chen J, Lv Y, Gao C, Guo S. Mycena sp., a mycorrhizal fungus of the orchid Dendrobium officinale. Mycol Prog. 2012;11(2):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-011-0754-1
• 55. Halbwachs H, Dentinger BTM, Detheridge AP, Karasch P, Griffith GW. Hyphae of waxcap fungi colonise plant roots. Fungal Ecol. 2013;6(6):487–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2013.08.003
• 56. Moora M, Öpik M, Sen R, Zobel M. Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species. Funct Ecol. 2004;18(4):554–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00876.x
• 57. Öpik M, Moora M, Liira J, Kõljalg U, Zobel M, Sen R. Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities colonize roots of Pulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils. New Phytol. 2003;160(3):581–593. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00917.x
• 58. Dickie IA, Guza RC, Krazewski SE, Reich PB. Shared ectomycorrhizal fungi between a herbaceous perennial (Helianthemum bicknellii) and oak (Quercus) seedlings. New Phytol. 2004;164(2):375–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01177.x
• 59. Mühlmann O, Bacher M, Peintner U. Polygonum viviparum mycobionts on an alpine primary successional glacier forefront. Mycorrhiza. 2008;18(2):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-007-0156-z
• 60. Bledsoe C, Klein P, Bliss LC. A survey of mycorrhizal plants on Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, NWT, Canada. Can J Bot. 1990;68(9):1848–1856. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-242
• 61. Massicotte HB, Melville LH, Peterson RL, Luoma DL. Anatomical aspects of field ectomycorrhizas on Polygonum viviparum (Polygonaceae) and Kobresia bellardii (Cyperaceae). Mycorrhiza. 1998;7(6):287–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050194
• 62. LoBuglio KF. Cenococcum. In: Cairney JWG, Chambers SM, editors. Ectomycorrhizal fungi key genera in profile. Berlin: Springer; 1999. p. 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06827-4_12
• 63. Stankeviciene D, Kasparavicius J, Rudawska M, Iwanski M. Studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi above- and belowground in the 50-year-old Pinus sylvestris L. forest. Balt For. 2008;14:7–15.
• 64. Cabon M, Adamcik S, Valachovic M. Diversity of the family Russulaceae in the Scots pine forests of Zahorska nizina (SW Slovakia). Czech Mycol. 2013;65(2):179–191.
• 65. Santamaría Pérez B, Pardos Mínguez M, Rincón A. Comunidad de hongos ectomicorrícicos asociados al regenerado de Pinus sylvestris L. a distinta altitud. In: 6 Congreso Forestal Español (book of abstracts); 2013 Jun 10–14; Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales; 2013. p. 6CFE01-075.
• 66. Vincenot L, Tedersoo L, Richard F, Horcine H, Kõljalg U, Selosse MA. Fungal associates of Pyrola rotundifolia, a mixotrophic Ericaceae, from two Estonian boreal forests. Mycorrhiza. 2008;19(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0199-9
• 67. Trocha LK, Kałucka I, Stasińska M, Nowak W, Dabert Ma, Leski T, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of native and non-native Pinus and Quercus species in a common garden of 35-year-old trees. Mycorrhiza. 2012;22(2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-011-0387-x
• 68. Booth MG. Mycorrhizal networks mediate overstorey–understorey competition in a temperate forest. Ecol Lett. 2004;7(7):538–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00605.x
• 69. Wójtowicz W. Biologia, wymagania siedliskowe i możliwości uprawy zachowawczej Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. Biuletyn Ogrodów Botanicznych, Muzeów i Zbiorów. 2000;9:45–54.
• 70. Ciosek MT. Rodzaj Pulsatilla (Ranunculaceae) na Podlasiu i Mazowszu. Fragm Florist Geobot Pol. 1999;6:15–19.
• 71. Tokarska-Guzik B, Chmura D. Stanowisko sasanki otwartej na “Górze Sodowej” w Jaworznie. Przyroda Górnego Śląska. 1998;14:16.
• 72. Wójtowicz W. Sasanka otwarta (Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. Eastern pasque flower). In: Werblan-Jakubiec H, Sudnik-Wójcikowska B, editors. Poradnik ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Środowiska; 2004. p. 168–171.
• 73. Uotila P. Ecology and area of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill. in Finland. Ann Bot Fenn. 1969;6:105–111.
• 74. Schönfelder P, Bresinsky A, editors. Verbreitungsatlas der Farn-und Blütenpflanzen Bayerns. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 1990.
• 75. Pilt I, Kukk Ü. Pulsatilla patens and Pulsatilla pratensis (Ranunculaceae) in Estonia: Distribution and ecology. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Biology and Ecology. 2002;51:242–256.
• 76. Kalamees R, Püssa K, Vanha-Majamaa I, Zobel K. The effects of fire and stand age on seedling establishment of Pulsatilla patens in a pine dominated boreal forest. Can J Bot. 2005;83:688–693. https://doi.org/10.1139/b05-038
• 77. Kalliovirta M, Ryttäri T, Heikkinen RK. Population structure of a threatened plant, Pulsatilla patens, in boreal forests: modelling relationships to overgrowth and site closure. Biodivers Conserv. 2006;15:3095–3108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-5403-z
• 78. Jordan NR, Larson DL, Huerd SC. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biol Invasions. 2008;10:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9121-1
• 79. Zając A, Zając M, editors. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Kraków: Nakład Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego i Fundacji dla Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2001.
• 80. Czerwiński A. Zbiorowiska leśne północno-wschodniej Polski. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Białostockiej; 1978. (Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Białostockiej).
• 81. Sokołowski A. Vascular plants of the Forest District Zwierzyniec in the Bialowieza Virgin Forest (northeastern Poland). Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica. 1968;14:129–150.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.3572