The effect of dietary bio-alginate supplementation of the growth rate and body weights of common pheasant (Phasianus Colchicus) chicks

• Autorzy: Hanzal V. , Divisova M. , Murawska D. , Janiszewski P.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ dodatku bioalginianu na tempo wzrostu i masę ciała kurcząt bażanta zwyczajnego (Phasianus Colchicus)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of bio-alginates on the growth rate of pheasant chicks. Two experiments were performed in pheasant chicks were administered the Biopolym supplement from 1 to 29 days of age (experiment 1) or from 1 to 36 days of age (experiment 2).The Biopolym supplement had a significant effect on the growth rate of pheasant chicks, the highestrelative increase in the body weights of birds was observed between 1 and 8 days of age, and it reached 62.9% in birds fed Biopolym-supplemented diets vs. 37.5% in the control group (P≤0.05) in experiment 1, and 60.2% vs. 48.0%, respectively (P≤0.05) in experiment 2. The body weights of pheasants fed Biopolym-supplemented diets increased 6.6-fold vs. 5.7-fold in the control group in experiment 1, and the respective values noted in experiment 2 were 9.1-fold vs. 8.4-fold (P≤0.05)

PL

Celem badań było określenie wpływu suplementacji dodatkiem bioalginianu na tempo wzrostu kurcząt bażanta. Przeprowadzono dwa doświadczenia w warunkach produkcyjnych, w których podawano pisklętom preparat Biopolym od 1. dnia życia do wieku 29 dni (doświadczenie 1.) lub do 36dnia (doświadczenie 2.). Stwierdzono istotny wpływ dodatku preparatu na tempo wzrostu masy ciała piskląt. Względne tempo wzrostu masy ciała piskląt było największe w okresie od 1–8. dnia życia u ptaków żywionych z dodatkiem preparatu Biopolym w doświadczeniu 1. wynosiło 62,9% i 37.5%w grupie kontrolnej (P≤0.05), a w doświadczeniu 2. odpowiednio – 60.2 i 48.0% (P≤0.05). Masa ciała ptaków, którym podawano Biopolym w doświadczeniu 1., wzrosła 6,6-krotnie (z 19,7 g do 133,3 g),a w grupie kontrolnej 5,7-krotnie (z 19,8 g do 112,3 g), natomiast doświadczeniu 2. odpowiednio 9,1-(z 20,5 g do 171,1 g) i 8,4-krotnie (z 20,3 g do 180,5 g;P≤0,05).

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 31
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.363-371,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hanzal V.

• Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Divisova M.

• Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Murawska D.

• Department of Commodity Science and Animal Improvement, Univeristy of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Michala Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Janiszewski P.

• Department of Fur-Bearing Animal Breeding and Game Management, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• BACH S.J., WANG Y., MCALISTER T.A. 2008. Effect of feeding sun-dried seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) on fecal shedding of Escherichia coliO157:H7 by feedlot cattle and on growth performance of lambs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 142(1–2): 17–32.
• CERMAK B., HNISOVÁ J., PETRASKOVA E., ŠOCH M., KADLEC J., LAD F., VOSTOUPAL B. 2010.The influenceof the different levels of crude proteins in feed mixture for pigs and poultry and biopolym addition to concentrate for farm building microclimate.J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 43: 26–28.
• ECKERT N.H., LEE J., HYATT T.D., STEVENS S.M., ANDERSON S., ANDERSON P.N., BELTRAN R.,SCHATZMAYR G., MOHNL M., CALDWELL D.J. 2010. Influence of probiotic administration by feed or water on growth parameters of broilers reared on medicated and non-medicated diets. J. Appl.Poult. Res., 19: 59–67.
• EHRMANN M.A., KURZAK P., BAUER J., VOGEL R.F. 2002.Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J. Appl. Microbiol., 92: 966–975.
• FULTON R.M., NERSESSIAN N.B., REED W.M. 2002.Prevention of Salmonella enteritidis Infection in Commercial Ducklings by Oral Chicken Egg-Derived Antibody Alone or in Combination with Probiotics. Poult. Sci., 81: 34–40.
• GJUROV V., ŠOCH M., VOSTOUPAL B., VRÁBLÍKOVÁ J., ZAJÍČEK P., NOVÁK P. 2007.Využitt biotechnologických přtpravku ̊. [In:] Proceedings of the Výzkum moderných technológií v Nitře, Nitřa,pp. 16–31. (article in Czech with an English abstract ).
• HANZAL V. 2006. Zásady prozajištěnt pohody zvěře – wildlife welfare. [In:] Proceedings of the Polovnıźcky manažment a ochrana zveri Lesnícka fakulta TU vo Zvoleně. Zvolen, pp. 97–101.(article in Czech with an English abstract).
• HANZAL V., JANISZEWSKI P., KUBECEK J., BERGMAN J., GJUROV V., UZINSKY ́ M., BALÁ SM. 2015. Support of the growth and prosperity of the Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings in forest nursery by theBio-algeen system – preliminary results. Pol. J. Natur. Sc., 30(3): 217–224.
• HAVENSTEIN G.B. 2006.Performance changes in poultry and livestock following 50 years of geneticselection. Lohmann Information 41: 34–37.
• HOLÁ M., ZÍKA T., ŠÁLEK M., HANZAL V., KUŠTA T., JEZˇEK M., HART V. 2015.Effect of habitat and game management practices on ring-necked pheasant harvest in the Czech Republic. Europ. J. Wildlife Res., 61: 73–80.
• HOLTE O., ONSOYEN E., MYRVOLD R., KARLSEN J. 2003.Sustained release of water – soluble drug from directly compressed alginate tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 20: 403–407.
• LUTFULKABIR S.M. 2009.The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10: 3531–2546.
• NOWACZEWSKI S., KONTECKA H. 2005.Effect of dietary vitamin C supplement on reproductive performance of aviary pheasants. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 208–212.
• PATTERSON J.A., BURKHODER K.M. 2003.Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production.Poult. Sci., 82: 627–637.
• PEREIRA L., SOUSA A., COELHO H., AMOLO A.M., RIBEIRO-CLARO P.J.A. 2003.Use of FTIR, FT Ramanand C – NMR spectroscopy for identification of some seaweed phycocolloids. Biomol. Eng., 20:223–228
• PETRÁŠKOVÁ E., HNISOVÁ J., ČERMÁK B., KOZELKOVÁ J., KECSEIOVÁ K. 2012.The effect of biopolym FZT on the degradation of feed in the rumen. Sci. Pap., Anim. Sci. Biotech., 45: 73–77.
• SCHULZE and HERMSENGMB H. 2002.Nitrogen reduction and pig slurry amount for purpose of necessary acreage reduction in pig production by means of the granulate Biopolym FZ.Guazamara – Cuevas de Almanzora, Schulze and Hermsen, pp. 1–6.
• Stat Soft Inc. 2011. Statistica (data analysis software system) version 11. www.statsoft.com.
• VOSTOUPAL B., SOCH M., NOVAK P., GJUROV V., JELINEK A., DEDINA M., PLIVA P. 2005.Options subpurpose redevelopment bioclimate rural areas using plant bio-algens series. Prague,pp. 105–108.
• WILLIAMS S., JONES T., LAMBERT B.D., HARP R., WEBER D. 2015.Effect of Tasco suplementation one quine semen characteristics. VIth International Scientific Symposium for PhD Students and Students of Agriculture Colleges, 17–19 September, Bydgoszcz – Ciechocinek, Poland, 140.
• YATES D.T, SALISBURY M.W., ROSS T.T., ANDERSON H. 2010. Effects of Tasco-14 supplementation on growth and fertility traits in young male boer goats experiencing heat stress. The Texas J. Agr.Natur. Res., 23: 12–18
• ZÁBRANSKY ́L., ŠOCH M., ŠÍP P., ŠIMKOVÁ A., ŠVEJDOVÁ K., ČERMÁK B., PETRÁŠKOVÁ E., MARŠÁLEK M. 2014. Influence of selected feeding supplements on the occurrence of coccidias in digestive tract of pheasants. Sci. Pap., Anim. Sci. Biotech., 47: 347–351.
• ZHANG Y., GONG J., YU H., GUO Q., DEFELICE C., HERNANDEZ M., YIN Y., WANG Q. 2014. Alginate-whey protein dry powder optimized for target delivery of essential oils to the intestine of chickens. Poult.Sci., 93: 2514–2525.