PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 20 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effect of sulphur fertilisation on the content of macroelements and their ionic ratios in potato tubers

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Next to nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium, sulphur plays an important role in plant metabolism and is considered to be one of the most important nutrients. As sulphur deficit in Polish soils has been increasing in the last few decades, research has been carried out in order to evaluate the impact of different sulphur rates and forms on the content of macroelements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Na) and their ratios in the Mila cultivar potato tubers. A strict, three-year field experiment was set up on Haplic Luvisol with acid reaction (5.3 pHKCl), mean richness in available forms of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium but low in sulphur. The field experiments involved the sulphur application in doses of 20 and 40 kg S kg-1 in the form of sulphate (VI) (K2SO4 and (NH4)2SO4) as well as in elemental form (Wigor S, containing 90% of pure sulphur and 10% of bentonite). Although potatoes represent the group of crops with low sulphur requirements, the research has clearly indicated that this component has definite impact on the content of macroelements in tubers. It was found that sulphur application, irrespective of its form and rate, compared with control sample generally increased the content of nitrogen, sulphur and magnesium in potato tubers, decreasing at the same time calcium content. The effect of the form of sulphur fertilisers on the content of macroelements was not univocal. The values of all the ratios calculated (K+:Mg+2, K+:(Ca+2+Mg+2) and (K++Na+ ):(Ca+2+Mg+2)), except for K+:Ca+2, have generally decreased after sulphur application, which indicates positive changes in the nutritive value of potato tubers.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

20

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.37-47,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Seminaryjna 5, 85-326 Bydgoszcz, Poland
autor
  • Department of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Barczak B. 2010. Sulphur as a nutrient determining the yield size and quality of selected crop species. Monograph, UTP Bydgoszcz, Poland, 144: 1-31. (in Polish)
  • Blake-Kalff M., Zhao F. J., McGrath S. P. 2003. Sulphur deficiency diagnosis using plant tissue analysis. Fertil. Fert., 3: 5-25.
  • Brodowska M.S., Kaczor A. 2009. The effect of various forms of sulphur and nitrogen on calcium and magnesium concentration and their uptake in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). J. Elem., 14(4): 641-647.
  • El-Fayoumy M.E., El-Gamal A.M., 1998. Effects of sulphur application rates on nutrients availability, uptake and potato quality and yield in calcaerous soil. Egypt. J. Soil Sci., 38(1-4): 271-286.
  • Eppendorfer W., Eggum B. 1994. Sulphur deficiency of potatoes as reflected in chemical composition and in some measures of nutritive value. Norw. J. Agric. Sci., 15: 127-134.
  • Grant C.A., Johnston A.M., Clayton G.W. 2003. Sulphur fertilizer and tillage effects on early season sulphur availability and N:S ratio in canola in western Canada. Can. J. Soil Sci., 83(4): 451-462.
  • Haneklaus S., Bloem E., Schnug E. 2000. Sulphur in agroecosystems. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin., Agric., 204, 81: 17-32.
  • Inal, A., Gűnes, A., Alpaslan, M., Adak, M., Taban, S., Eraslan, F. 2003. Diagnosis of sulphur deficiency and effects of sulphur on yield and yield components of wheat grown in central Anatolia Turkey. J. Plant Nutr., 26(7): 1483-1498.
  • Janzen H.H., Bettany J.R. 1984. Sulphur nutrition of rapeseed. I. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen and sulphur rates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48: 100-106.
  • Kaczor A., Brodowska M.S. 2009. Yield of cocksfoot (Dactilis glomerata L.) and its nitrogen and sulphur content after fertilization with various forms of these nutrients. J. Elem., 14(4): 665-670.
  • Khan A. H. 2012. Improvement of total sulphur measurement techniques for management of reactive mine tailings. West. Univ. London, Ontario, Canada, 1-129.
  • Klikocka H. 2004. Sulphur fertilization of potato. Fragm. Agron., 21(3): 80-94. (in Polish)
  • Klikocka H. 2005. The influence of sulphur fertilization on the yield value and infection rate of potato tubers by Streptomyces scabies and Rhizoctonia solani. Fragm. Agron., 4: 38-50. (in Polish)
  • Krzywy J., Baran S., Krzywy E., 2002. The influence of fertilizers in shaping relations ion K:Mg, K:(Mg+Ca), Ca:P and N:S in cultivated plants. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 484: 317-323. (in Polish)
  • Lalitha, B. S., Sharanappa-Hunsigi, T., 1997. Influence of potassium and sulphur levels on growth, yield and quality of potato raised through seed tuber and true potato seed (TPS). J. Ind. Potato Assoc., 24(1-2): 74-78.
  • McGrath S.P., Zhao F.J., 1996. Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci., 126: 53-62.
  • Morris R.J. 2007. Sulphur in agriculture. Global overview. Ferliz. Focus. 1/2: 12-16.
  • Pavlista A.D. 1995. Kontrolle des Kartoffelschorfes mit Schwefel und Ammoniumsulfat. Kartoffelbau, 46: 154-157.
  • Sahota T.S. 2006. Importance of sulphur in crop production. Ontario Farmer, 13, 38(42): 10-12.
  • Sawicka B., Pszczółkowski P. 2004. Phenotypical variation of yield structure of potato cultivars under conditions of central eastern Poland. Biul. IHAR, 232: 53-66. (in Polish)
  • Sharma, D.K., Kushw ah S.S., Nema P.K., Rathore S.S., 2011. Effect of sulphur on yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Int. J. Agric. Res., 6: 143-148.
  • Skwierawska M., Zawartka L., Zawadzki B. 2008. The effect of different rates and forms of applied sulphur on nutrient composition of planted crops. Plant Soil Environ., 54: 179-189.
  • Stern D. 2005. Global sulphur emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere, 58: 163-175.
  • Sud K.C., Sharma R.C, Verma B.C. 1996. Evaluation of levels and sources of sulphur on potato nutrition in Shimla hills. Potato J., 23: 134-138.
  • Szulc, W. 2008. Sulphur fertilizing of plants and methods of determination. SGGW, Warszawa, Poland, 332: 1-132. (in Polish)
  • Walker K., Booth E.J. 1994. Sulphur deficiency in Scotland and the effects of sulphur supplementation on yield and quality of oilseed rape. Norw. J. Agric. Sci., Suppl., 15: 97-104.
  • Withers P.J., Tytherleigh A.R., O’Donell F.M. 1995. Effect of sulphur fertilizers on the grain yield and sulphur content of cereals. J. Agric. Sci., 125: 317-324.
  • Zhao F.J., McGrath S.P., Blake-Kalff M.M., Link A., Tucker M. 2003. Crop responses to sulphur fertilisation in Europe. Fertil. Fert., 3(16): 26-47.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-90bf969c-afd3-409c-b065-2e1e7b696eb2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.