A new marsh plant community of Eleocharito palustris-Alismatetum lanceolati (Eleocharito palustris-Sagittarion sagittifoliae alliance) in Slovakia

• Autorzy: Hrivnak R. , Slezak M. , Sumberova K. , Hroudova Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Open and species-poor stands with a dominance of Alisma lanceolatum were recorded in periodically flooded habitats of the southern part of central Slovakia (Ipel' River catchment area) during the summer of 2013. Phytosociological relevés correspond to the association Eleocharito palustris-Alismatetum lanceolati (alliance Eleocharito palustris-Sagittarion sagittifoliae), which is reported and documented here for the first time from the territory of Slovakia. It inhabits predominantly temporarily flooded depressions on agricultural land - wet arable fields and extensively used pastures. Detrended correspondence analysis showed that the variability in species composition was most significantly influenced by water depth, the presence of arable fields in the contact area and water conductivity. Special attention was paid to a detailed description of the floristic composition, habitat requirements, distribution patterns and nomenclature of the community.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

new plant community; marsh; plant community; Alisma lanceolatum; Eleocharito palustris-Sagittarion sagittifoliae alliance; wetland; vegetation; nomenclature; Slovakia

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 84
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.311-319,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Hrivnak R.

• Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia

autor

Slezak M.

• Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia
• Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Education, Catholic University, Hrabovska cesta 1, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia
• Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G.Masaryka 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia

autor

Sumberova K.

• Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidicka 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Hroudova Z.

• Department of Genetic Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zamek 1, 252 43 Pruhonice, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1.Nagy J, Gál B, Tuba Z, Szerdahelyi T, Czóbel S, Szirmai O, et al. Monodominant plant associations in the Bodrogköz (NE Hungary) new for science and for Hungary. Thaiszia. 2009;19(1 suppl):299-314.
• 2.Hrivnák R, Kochjarová J, Oťahelová H. Vegetation of the aquatic and marshland habitats in the Orava region, including the first records of Potametum alpini, Potametum zizii and Ranunculo-Juncetum bulbosi in the territory of Slovakia. Biologia. 2011;66:626-637. http://dx.doi. org/10.2478/s11756-011-0060-z
• 3.Hroudová Z, Zákravský P, Ducháček M, Marhold K. Taxonomy, distribution and ecology of Bolboschoenus in Europe. Ann Bot Fenn. 2007;44:81-102.
• 4.Hroudová Z, Hrivnák R, Chytrý M. Classification of inland Bolboschoenus-dominated vegetation in Central Europe. Phytocoenologia. 2009;39:205-215. http://dx.doi. org/10.1127/0340-269X/2009/0039-0205
• 5.Balátová-Tuláčková E, Mucina L, Ellmauer T, Wallnöfer S. Phragmito-Magnocaricetea. In: Grabherr G, Mucina L, editors. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Östrerreichs. Teil II. Natürliche waldfreie Vegetation. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1993. p. 79-165.
• 6.Oťahelová H, Hrivnák R, Valachovič M. Phragmito-Magnocaricetea. In: Valachovič M, editor. Rastlinné spoločenstvá Slovenska 3. Vegetácia mokradí. Bratislava: Veda; 2001. p. 51-183.
• 7.Chytrý M, editor. Vegetace České republiky 3. Vodní a mokřadní vegetace. Praha: Academia; 2011.
• 8.Borhidi A, Kevey B, Lendvai G. Plant communities of Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó; 2012.
• 9.Nagy J, Tuba Z, Szirmai O, Czóbel S, Gál B, Cserhalmi D, et al. A tudományra és hazánkra nézve új n0vénytársulásók a Bodrogközböl. In: Tuba Z, editor. Bodrogköz: G0d0ll6-Sárospatak; 2008. p. 585-600.
• 10.Mucina L, Maglocký Š, editors. A list of vegetation units of Slovakia. Doc Phytosociol. 1985;9:175-220.
• 11.Jarolímek I, Šibík J, editors. Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of the higher vegetation units of Slovakia. Bratislava: Veda; 2008.
• 12.Hejný S. Ökologische Charakteristik der Wasser- und Sumpfpflanzen in den slowakischen Tiefebenen (Donau- und Theissgebieten). Bratislava: SAV; 1960.
• 13.Hrivnák R. Spoločenstvá zväzu Oenanthion aquaticae v povodí rieky Ipel. Bull Slov Bot Spoločn. 2003;25:169-183.
• 14.Hrivnák R. Aquatic plant communities in the catchment area of the Ipel River in Slovakia and Hungary. Part I. Classes Lemnetea and Charetea fragilis. Thaiszia. 2002;12:25-50.
• 15.Hrivnák R. Aquatic plant communities in the catchment area of the Ipel River in Slovakia and Hungary. Part II. Class Potametea. Thaiszia. 2002;12:137-160.
• 16.Hrivnák R. The plant communities of Phragmitetalia in the catchment area of the Ipel River (Slovakia and Hungary) 1. Reed wetlands (Phragmition communis). Biologia. 2004;59:75-99.
• 17.Hrivnák R. The plant communities of Phragmitetalia in the catchment area of the Ipel River (Slovakia and Hungary) 2. Tall-sedge dominated wetlands (Magnocaricion eletae). Biologia. 2004;59:457-476.
• 18.Westhoff V, van der Maarel E. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker RH, editor. Ordination and classification of communities. The Hague: Junk; 1973. p. 617-727.
• 19.Barkman JJ, Doing H, Segal S. Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. Acta Bot Neerl. 1964;13:394-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1964.tb00164.x
• 20.Hennekens SM, Schaminée JHJ. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. J Veg Sci. 2001;12:589-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3237010
• 21.Hill MO. TWINSPAN. A Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 1979.
• 22.Tichý L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci. 2002;13:451-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002. tb02069.x
• 23.ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. CANOCO Reference manual and Cano-Draw for Windows User's guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power; 2002.
• 24.StatSoft. STATISTICA. System reference. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft Inc.; 2001.
• 25.Marhold K, Hindák F, editors. Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia. Bratislava: Veda; 1998.
• 26.Chytrý M, editor. Vegetace České republiky 1. Travinná a keříčková vegetace. Praha: Academia; 2007.
• 27.Weber HE, Moravec J, Theurillat JP. International Code of Phytoso-ciological Nomenclature. 3rd ed. J Veg Sci. 2000;11:739-768. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236580
• 28.Dengler J, Berg C, Eisenberg M, Isermann M, Jansen F, Koska I, et al. New descriptions and typifications of syntaxa within the project "Plant communities of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and their vulnerability" - part I. Feddes Repert. 2003;114:587-631. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/fedr.200311017
• 29.Minissale P, Spampinato G. Osservazioni fitosoziologiche sul "Lago Gurrida" (Sicilia Nord-Orientale). Giorn Bot Ital. 1985;119:197-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263508509428015
• 30.Landucci F, Gigante D, Venanzoni R, Chytrý M. Wetland vegetation of the class Phragmito-Magno-Caricetea in central Italy. Phytocoenologia. 2013;43:67-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2013/0043-0545
• 31.Daoud-Bouattour A, Muller SD, Ferchichi-Ben Jamaa H, Ben Saad-Limam S, Rhazi L, Soulie-Märsche I, et al. Conservation of Mediterranean wetlands: interest of historical approach. C R Biol. 2011;334:742-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2011.07.006
• 32.Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, et al., editors. Flora Europaea. Vol. 5: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
• 33.Zahlheimer WA. Vegetationsstudien in den Donauauen zwischen Regensburg und Straubing als Grundlage für den Naturschutz. Hoppea. 1979;38:3-398.
• 34.Moravec J, Balátová-Tuláčková E, Blažková D, Hadač E, Hejný S, Husák Š, et al. Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení. 2nd ed. Litoměřice: Okresní vlastivědné muzeum v Litoměřicích; 1995. (Severočeskou přírodou Příloha; vol 3,1).
• 35.Schubert R, Herdam H, Weinitschke H, Frank J. Prodromus der Pflanzengesellschaften Sachsen-Anhalts. Mitt Florist Kart SachsenAnhalt. 2001;2(suppl):1-688.
• 36.Schubert R, Hilbig W, Klotz S. Bestimmungsbuch der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2001.
• 37.Chifu T, Mänzu C, Zamfirescu O. Flora $i vegetatia Moldovei (Romania). II. Vegetatia. Iaęi: Editura Universitätii, Alexandru Ioan Cuza; 2006.
• 38.Dubyna DV. Višča vodna roslynnisť. Kyiv: Instytut botaniky im. M.G. Kholodnogo NAN Ukrainy; 2006.
• 39.Timár L. Zönologische Untersuchungen in den Äckern Ungarns. Acta Bot Acad Sci Hung. 1957;3:79-108.
• 40.Westhoff V, den Held AJ. Plantengemeenschappen in Nederland. Zutphen: Thieme; 1969.
• 41.Hejný S, Husák Š. Higher plant communities. In: Dykyjová D, Květ J, editors. Pond littoral ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1978. p. 23-64. (Ecological Studies; vol 28). http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-66838-8_3
• 42.Drägulescu C. Study of Phragmitetalia order vegetation in the range of Sibiu county (Transylvania, Romania). Rom J Aquat Ecol. 2011;1:19-44.
• 43.Wayda M. Distribution of Alisma lanceolatum (Alismataceae) in Poland. Fragm Flor Geobot. 1997;42:43-48.
• 44.Kącki Z, Śliviński M. The Polish Vegetation Database: structure, resources and development. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2012;81(2):75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2012.014
• 45.Borysiak J. Struktura aluwialnej roślinności lądowej środkowego i dolnego biegu Warty. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM; 1994.
• 46.Gąbka M, Dolata PT. Rzadkie i zagrożone zbiorowiska hydrofitów stawów rybnych południowej Wielkopolski. Badania Fizjograficzne. Seria B - Botanica. 2010;59:75-96.
• 47.Němec R, Dřevojan P, Šumberová K. Polní mokřady Znojemska jako refugium významných a vzácných druhů cévnatých rostlin. Thayensia. 2014;11:3-76.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.2015.026