PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 20 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Taxonomy of the genus Gardnerycteris (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The Neotropical genus Gardnerycteris has been recently erected and described as a result of a morphologically-based phylogenetic analysis of Phyllostominae with emphasis on representatives of Mimon sensu lato. As currently understood Gardnerycteris is formed by two species, G. crenulatum and G. koepckeae. However, it has been hypothesized that G. crenulatum might be a complex of species, from which the form G. c. keenani exhibits the clearest morphological differences from other populations of ‘crenulatum’. Species limits and relationships among forms of Gardnerycteris have been only partially explored on the basis of morphological variation. Herein, we obtained partial sequences of two mitochondrial genes (cytb and COX1) and one nuclear gene (RAG2) from representatives of G. koepckeae and G. c. keenani in order to clarify the relationships within the genus. Furthermore, we performed qualitative and quantitative morphological comparisons among G. crenulatum sensu stricto, G. c. keenani, and G. koepckeae to limit species. Our results support the monophyly of Gardnerycteris, as well as the molecular and morphological differentiation of G. c. keenani from other congeners. In the light of the results, we propose changes in the taxonomy of the genus, raising ‘keenani’ to the species level.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

20

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.99-115,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Doctorado en Ciencias, Mencion Ecologia y Evolucion, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Isla Teja s/n, Valdivia, Chile
  • Departamento de Mastozoologia, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Av. Arenales 1256, Lima 14, Lima, Peru
autor
  • Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Isla Teja s/n, Valdivia, Chile

Bibliografia

  • 1. Albuja, L. 1999. Murciélagos del Ecuador. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, EPN, Quito. 345 pp. Google Scholar
  • 2. Antonelli, A., J. A. Nylander, C. Persson, and I. Sanmartín. 2009. Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neo tropical plant evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106: 9749–9754. Google Scholar
  • 3. Baker, R. J., C. A. Porter, J. C. Patton, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2000. Systematics of bats of the family Phyllostomidae based on RAG2 DNA sequences. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University, 202: 1–16. Google Scholar
  • 4. Baker, R. J., S. R. Hoofer, C. A. Porter, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2003. Diversification among New World leafnosed bats: An evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequence. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University, 230: 1–32. Google Scholar
  • 5. Cabrera, A. L. 1958. Catálogo de los mamíferos de América del Sur I (Metatheria-Unguiculata-Carnivora). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, 4: iv + 307. Google Scholar
  • 6. Cadenillas, R. 2010. Diversidad, ecología y análisis biogeográfico de los murciélagos del Parque Nacional Cerros de Amotape, Tumbes Peru. M.Sci. Thesis. Retrieved from Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru, 111 pp. Google Scholar
  • 7. Carrera, J. P., S. Solari, P. A. Larsen, D. F. Alvarado, A. D. Brown, C. Carrión, J. S. Tello, and R. J. Baker. 2010. Bats of the Tropical Lowlands of western Ecuador. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, 57: 1–37. Google Scholar
  • 8. Ceballos, G., and G. Oliva. 2005. Mamíferos silvestres de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Ciudad de México, 988 pp. Google Scholar
  • 9. Clare, E. L., B. K. Lim, M. D. Engstrom, J. L. Eger, and P. D. N. Hebert. 2007. DNA barcoding of Neotropical bats: species identification and discovery within Guyana. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7: 184–190. Google Scholar
  • 10. Dávalos, L. M., A. L. Cirranello, J. H. Geisler, and N. B. Simmons. 2012. Understanding phylogenetic incongruence: Lessons from phyllostomid bats. Biological Reviews, 87: 991–1024. Google Scholar
  • 11. Dávalos, L. M., P. M. Velazco, O. M. warsi, P. D. Smits, and N. B. Simmons. 2014. Integrating incomplete fossils by isolating conflicting signal in saturated and non-independent morphological characters. Systematic Biology, 63: 582–600. Google Scholar
  • 12. Drummond, A. J., M. A. Suchard, D. Xie, and A. Rambaut. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29: 1969–1973. Google Scholar
  • 13. Gardner, A. L., and C. S. Ferrel. 1991. Comments on the nomenclature of some Neotropical bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 103: 501–508. Google Scholar
  • 14. Gardner, A. L., and J. L. Patton. 1972. New species of Philan der (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) and Mimon (Chiroptera: Phyl lostomidae) from Peru. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of Louisiana State University, 43: 1–12. Google Scholar
  • 15. Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, É. 1803. Catalogue des mammifères du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, 272 pp. Google Scholar
  • 16. Goodwin, G. G., and A. M. Greenhall. 1961. A review of the bats of Trinidad and Tobago: Description, rabies infection, and ecology. Bulletin of the America Museum of Natural History, 122: 187–302. Google Scholar
  • 17. Handley, C. O. 1960. Descriptions of new bats from Panamá. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 112: 459–479. Google Scholar
  • 18. Heled, J., and A. J. Drummond. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 570–580. Google Scholar
  • 19. Hoffmann, F. G., and R. J. Baker. 2001. Systematics of bats of the genus Glossophaga (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) and phylogeography in G. soricina based on the cytochrome b gene. Journal of Mammalogy, 82: 1092–1101. Google Scholar
  • 20. Hoffmann, F. G., S. R. Hoofer, and R. J. Baker. 2008. Molecular dating of the diversification of Phyllostominae bats based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49: 653–658. Google Scholar
  • 21. Hoorn, C., F. P. Wesselingh, H. Ter Steege, M. A. Bermudez, A. Mora, J. Sevink, I. Sanmartín, A. Sanchez-Meseguer, C. L. Anderson, J. P. Figueiredo , et al. 2010. Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science, 330: 927–931. Google Scholar
  • 22. Hurtado, N., and V. Pacheco. 2014. Análisis filogenético del género Mimon Gray, 1847 (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllosto midae) con la descripción de un nuevo género. Therya, 5: 751–791. Google Scholar
  • 23. Hurtado, N., E. Arias, and V. Pacheco. 2014. Redescription of Mimon koepckeae (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Zoologia, 31: 377–388. Google Scholar
  • 24. Husson, A. M. 1962. The bats of Suriname. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, 58: 1–282. Google Scholar
  • 25. Koopman, K. F. 1978. Zoogeography of Peruvian bats with special emphasis on the role of the Andes. American Museum Novitates, 2651: 1–33. Google Scholar
  • 26. Koopman, K. F. 1993. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 137–241, in Mammal species of the World, a taxonomic and geographic reference, 2nd edition ( D. E. Wilson, and D. M. Reeder, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 1207 pp. Google Scholar
  • 27. Koopman, K. F. 1994. Chiropteran systematics. Pp. 75–76, in Handbuch der Zoologie, Volume 8, Part 60 ( J. Niethammer, H. Schliemann, and D. Starck, eds.). Walter de Gruyter Press, Berlin, Germany, 217 pp. Google Scholar
  • 28. Lau, M. K. 2013. DTK: Dunnett-Tukey-Kramer pairwise multiple comparison test adjusted for unequal variances and unequal sample sizes. (R package version 3.5). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DTK. Accessed 17th August 2016. Google Scholar
  • 29. Miller, G. S., Jr . 1907. The families and genera of bats. Bulletin of the United Stated National Museum, 57: 1–282. Google Scholar
  • 30. Murphy W. J., and S. J. O'brien. 2007. Designing and optimizing comparative anchor primers for comparative gene mapping and phylogenetic inference. Nature Protocols, 2: 3022–3030. Google Scholar
  • 31. Pacheco, V., R. Cadenillas, S. Velazco, E. Salas, and U. Fajardo. 2007. Noteworthy bat records from the Pacific Tropical rainforest region and adjacent dry forest in northwestern Peru. Acta Chiropterologica, 9: 409–422. Google Scholar
  • 32. Patton, J. C., and R. J. Baker. 1978. Chromosomal homology and evolution of Phyllostomatid bats. Systematic Zoology, 27: 449–462. Google Scholar
  • 33. Petters, W. 1866. Über neue oder ungenügend bekannte Fleder thiere (Vampyrops, Uroderma, Chiroderma, Ametrida, Tylostoma, Vespertilio, Vesperugo) und Nager (Tylomys, Lasiomys). Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussische Akad emie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1867: 392–411. Google Scholar
  • 34. Posada, D. 2008. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular biology and evolution, 25: 1253–1256. Google Scholar
  • 35. R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ . Google Scholar
  • 36. Rambaut, A. 2006. FigTree software. Retrieved from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ Google Scholar
  • 37. Reid, F. 2009. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, xvii + 334 pp. Google Scholar
  • 38. Rojas, D., O. M. Warsi, and L. M. Dávalos. 2016. Bats (Chiroptera: Noctilionoidea) challenge a recent origin of extant Neotropical diversity. Systematic Biology, 65: 432–448. Google Scholar
  • 39. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572–1574. Google Scholar
  • 40. Schinz, H. R. 1844. Systematisches Verzeichniss aller bis jetzt bekannten Säugethiere oder Synopsis Mammalium nach dem Cuvier'schen System. Jent und Gassmann, Solothurn, 1: xvi + 1–587. Google Scholar
  • 41. Schinz, H. R. 1845. Systematisches Verzeichniss aller bis jetzt bekannten Säugethiere oder Synopsis Mammalium nach dem Cuvier'schen System. Jent und Gassmann, Solothurn, 2: iv + 1–574. Google Scholar
  • 42. Simmons, N. B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312–529, in Mammal species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition ( D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.), Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, 2142 pp. Google Scholar
  • 43. Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85: 1–135. Google Scholar
  • 44. Smith, B. T., J. E. Mccormack, A. M. Cuervo, M. J. Hickerson, A. Aleixo, C. D. Cadena, J. Pérez-Emán, C. W. Burney, X. Xie, M. G. Harvey , et al. 2014. The drivers of tropical speciation. Nature, 515: 406–409. Google Scholar
  • 45. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22: 2688–2690. Google Scholar
  • 46. Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28: 2731–2739. Google Scholar
  • 47. Thomas, O. 1903. Notes on South-American monkeys, bats, carnivores, and rodents, with descriptions of new species. Annals and magazine of Natural History, 7, 12: 455–464. Google Scholar
  • 48. Thomas, O., 1923. Three new mammals from Peru. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9, 12: 341–342. Google Scholar
  • 49. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22: 4673–4680. Google Scholar
  • 50. Van Den Bussche, R. A. 1989. Systematic study of the genera of the New World leaf-nosed bat family Phyllostomidae: cladistical analysis of site variation in the ribosomal DNA cistron. Ph.D. Thesis, Texas Tech University. Lub bock, Texas, 145 pp. Google Scholar
  • 51. Van Den Bussche, R. A., and R. J. Baker. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the New World bat genus Phyllostomus based on cytochrome b DNA sequence variation. Journal of Mammalogy, 74: 793–802. Google Scholar
  • 52. Velazco, P. M. 2005. Morphological phylogeny of the bat genus Platyrrhinus Saussure, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) with the description of four new species. Fieldiana Zoology, 105: 1–53. Google Scholar
  • 53. Velazco, P. M., and R. Cadenillas. 2011. On the identity of Lophostoma silvicolum occidentalis (Davis and Carter, 1978) (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Zootaxa, 2962: 1–20. Google Scholar
  • 54. Velazco, P. M., and A. L. Gardner. 2012. A new species of Lophostoma d'Orbigny, 1836 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from Panama. Journal of Mammalogy, 93: 605–614. Google Scholar
  • 55. Velazco, P. M., and B. D. Patterson. 2008. Phylogenetics and biogeography of the broad-nosed bats, genus Platyrrhinus (Chi roptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49: 749–759. Google Scholar
  • 56. Velazco, P. M., and B. D. Patterson. 2013. Diversification of the yellow-shouldered bats, Genus Sturnira (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae), in the New World tropics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 68: 683–698. Google Scholar
  • 57. Wagner, J. A. 1843. Diagnosen neuer Arten brasilischer Handflügler. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 9: 365–68. Google Scholar
  • 58. Wetterer, A. L., M. V. Rockman, and N. B. Simmons. 2000. Phylogeny of phyllostomid bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): da ta from diverse morphological systems, sex chromosomes, and restriction sites. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History, 248: 1–200. Google Scholar
  • 59. Williams S. L., and H. H. Genoways. 2008. Subfamily Phyllo stominae. Pp. 255–299, in Mammals of South America, Volume 1: Marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews, and bats ( A. L. Gardner, ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 690 pp. Google Scholar

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-897b3201-e6a7-4729-8dcf-21d58b4bc222
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.