Assessment of semen characteristics in muscovy drake (Cairina moschata)

• Autorzy: Gerzilov V.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena nasienia kaczorów piżmowych (Cairina moschata)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

PL

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu. Biologia i Hodowla Zwierząt
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: 62
• Opis fizyczny: p.149-156,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gerzilov V.

• Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Bibliografia

• Bakst M.R., Cecil H.C., 1997. Nigrosin/eosin stain for determining live/dead and abnormal sperm counts, [in:] Bakst M.R., Wishart G.J. Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage and fertility determination. PSA, Savoy, I.L. (Eds), 29-35.
• Bechsted U., Schamm G.P., Hemmerschmidt G., 1977. Untersuchugen zur spermagewinnung and spermproduktion bei Moschuserpein. Monatsh Veterinarmed, 24: 945-947.
• Brillard J.-P., 2003. Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 59: 441-446.
• Brun J.-M., Larzul C., 2003. Inheritance of reproductive traits of female common ducks (Anas platyrhychos) in pure breeding and in inter-generic crossbreeding with Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata). British Poultry Science, 44: 1-6.
• Brun J.-M., Mialon-Richard M.-M., Selier N., Batellier F., Brillarad J.-P., 2008. Duration of fertil¬ity and hatchability of the common duck (Anas platyrhychos) in pure- or crossbreeding with Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata). Theriogenology, 69: 983-989.
• Cheng Y.S. Rouvier R., Hu Y.H., Tai J.J.L., Tai C., 2003. Breeding and genetics of waterfowl. World's Poultry Science Journal, 59: 509-519.
• Cheng Y.S., Rouvier R., Poivey J.-P., Tai J.J.L., Tai C., Huang S.C., 2002. Selection responses for the number of fertile eggs of the Brown Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhychos) after a single artificial insemination with pooled Muscovy (Cairina moschata)semen. Genetic Selection Evolution, 34: 597-611.
• Delacour J., 1964. The waterfowl of the world. Country life Ltd, London, Vol. 4: 166.
• Donoghue A.M., 1999. Prospective approaches to avoid flock fertility problems: Predictive assessment of sperm function traits in poultry. Poultry Science, 78: 437-443.
• Gerzilov V., 2000. A method for obtaining of semen from the species Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata). Zhivotnov dni nauki (Journal of Animal Science), 37 (4): 56-63 (in Bulgarian).
• Gerzilov V., 2003. A study of semen production of Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata) and the possibility for receiving of mule ducks by artificial insemination of Pekin ducks (Anas platy- rhynchos). PhD Thesis, p. 150. (in Bulgarian).
• Gerzilov V., 2004. Artificial insemination of Pekin ducks with pooled and diluted Muscovy semen. XXII World's Poultry Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 8-13 June 2004, CD-rom, code 1415.
• Gvaryahu G., Robinzon B., Meltzer A., Perek M., Snapir N., 1984 a. An improved method for ob¬taining semen from muscovy drakes and some of its quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Poultry Science, 63: 548-553.
• Gvaryahu G., Robinzon B., Meltzer A., Snapir N., 1984 b. Semen characteristics of the muscovy drake (Cairina moschata) as affected by seasonal variation. Reproduction Nutriton Develop¬ment, 24 (4): 343-350.
• Holsberger D.R., Donoghue, A.M.,. Froman, D.P, Ottinger M.A., 1998. Assessment of ejaculate quality and sperm characteristics in turkeys: Sperm mobility phenotype is independent of time. Poultry Science, 77: 1711-1717.
• Huang H.H., Chow T.C. 1974. Artificial insemination in mule duck production. Proceeding of 15"th World Poultry Congress, New Orleans, USA, p. 261-262.
• Kamar G., 1962. Semen characteristics of various breeds of drakes in the subtropics. Journal Reproduction and Fertilitty, 3: 405-409.
• Kurbatov A.D., Narubina L.E., Bogomolov V.V., Bessulin V.I., Davtian A.D., 1987. Artificial insemination of poultry. Moscow, VO Agropromizdat: 127 (in Russian).
• Łukaszewicz E., Kruszyński W., 2003. Evaluation of fresh and frozen - thawed semen of indi¬vidual ganders by assessment of spermatozoa motility and morphology. Theriogenology, 59: 1627-1640.
• Marie-Etancelin C., Chapuis J.M., Brun J.-M., Larzul C., Mialon-Richards M.M., Rouvier R., 2008. Genetics and selection of mule ducks in France: a review. World's Poultry Science Jour¬nal, 64: 187-207.
• Marzoni Fecia di Cossato M., 1993. Valutazione analitica dello sperma e techniche di fecondazi- oneartificiale in alcune picole specie. Tesi di dottorato di ricerca, Universita degli studi di Pisa: 149 (In Italian)
• Onishi N., Kato, Y., 1955. On the mule duck production by means of a new artificial insemination technic. Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, G, 11: 17-31.
• Peters S.O, Shoyebo O.D., Ilori B.M., Ozoje M.O., Ikeobi C.O.N., Adebambo O.A., 2004. Semen Quality Traits of Seven Strain of Chickens Raised in the Humid Tropics. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7 (10): 949-953.
• Setioko A.R., Hetzel, D.J., 1984. The effect of collection method and Housing system on semen production and fertility of Alabio drakes. British Poultry Science, 25: 167-172.
• Sexton T.J., 1983. Maximizing the utilization of the male breeder: A review. Poultry Science, 62: 1700-1710.
• Tan N.S., 1980. The training of drakes for semen collection. Annale deZootechnies, 29 (2): 93-102.
• Tran T.D., Kis A., Papp M., 1986. A szaporagasâg novelése a mâjkacsa (mulard) eloallitasban mesterséges termékenyitéssel. Allattenyésztes es takamanyozas, 35(5): 421-427 (in Hungarian). Vuillaume A., 1985. Les facteurs limitants de la reproduction ches les palmipèdes producteurs de foie gras. Revue de médecine vétérinaire, 136 (1): 25-36.
• Watanabe M., 1961. Experimental studies on the artificial insemination of domestic ducks with special reference to the production of mule ducks. Journal Faculty of Fishery and Animal Hus¬bandry, Hiroshima University, 3: 439-478.