Interrelationships between morphometric, densitometric, and mechanical properties of mandible in 6-month-old male pigs

• Autorzy: Tymczyna B. , Bachanek T. , Tatara M. R. , Krupski W. , Tymczyna-Sobotka M. , Luszczewska-Sierakowska I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to evaluate interrelationships between final body weight, and morphometric, densitometric, and mechanical properties of the mandible in 6-month-old Polish Large White pigs exposed to dexamethasone and nanocalcium. The study was performed on 27 males, castrated on the 28th d after weaning, and reared until the age of 6 months, after which the animals were slaughtered, and the mandible was obtained. The pigs were divided into four experimental groups: animals given per os nanopartical calcium, animals injected with dexamethasone, animals given both nanopartical calcium per os and dexamethasone injections, and animals injected with placebo. After the slaughter, morphological properties of the mandible such as bone weight and length were determined. Using computed tomography technique, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the cortical bone (Cd), mean volumetric bone mineral density (MvBMD), and total bone volume (Bvol) of whole mandible were measured. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content were evaluated with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric method. Using three-point bending test, mechanical parameters such as maximum elastic strength (Wy) and ultimate strength (Wf) of mandible were estimated. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was determined between all the investigated variables. The obtained results showed a significantly positive correlation between body weight and mandible weight, mandible length, Bvol, Cd, BMD, BMC, Wy, and Wf. However, statistically insignificant correlations of MvBMD and body weight, mandible weight, mandible length, and Bvol were observed. Furthermore, Bvol and Cd were not found to be significantly correlated. In conclusion, this study showed numerous positive correlations between final body weight and densitometric, morphometric, and mechanical properties of the mandible. This bone of pigs may be used as an attractive model for further investigation on metabolic response of the skeleton to physiological, nutritional, toxicological, and pharmacological factors influencing bone tissue metabolism.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Puławy
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 56
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.177-181,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Tymczyna B.

• Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland

autor

Bachanek T.

autor

Tatara M. R.

autor

Krupski W.

autor

Tymczyna-Sobotka M.

autor

Luszczewska-Sierakowska I.

Bibliografia

• 1. Advani S., Wimalawansa S.J.: Bones and nutrition: common sense supplementation for osteoporosis. Curr Women Health Rep 2003, 3, 187-192.
• 2. Barkmann R., Kantorovich E., Singal C., Hans D., Genant H.K., Heller M., Glüer C.C.: A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 2000, 3, 1-7.
• 3. Bras J., van Ooij C.P., van den Akker H.P.: Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss. Int Dent J 1990, 40, 298-302.
• 4. Canalis E.: Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003, 15, 454-457.
• 5. Drozdowska B., Michno M., Michno A.: The relationship between mandibular bone mass and skeletal osteopenia/osteoporosis - a review. Nowa Stomatol 2002, 3, 127-130.
• 6. Ferretti J.L., Capozza R.F., Mondelo N., Zanchetta J.N.: Interrelationships between densitometric, geometric and mechanical properties of rat femora: inferences concerning mechanical regulation of the bone modeling. J Bone Miner Res 1993, 8, 1389-1395.
• 7. Genant H.K., Steiger P., Block J.E., Glueer C.C., Ettinger B., Hams S.T.: Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987. Calcif Tissue Int 1987, 41, 179-186.
• 8. Groen J.J., Duyvensz F., Halsted J.A.: Diffuse alveoral atrophy of the jaw (non-inflammatory from of paradental disease) and pre-senile osteoporosis. Geront Clin 1960, 2, 68-86.
• 9. Hakeda Y.: Action of glucocorticoid on bone-forming and bone-resorbing cells. Clin Calcium 2006, 16, 1817-1822.
• 10. Hildebolt C.F.: Osteoporosis and oral bone loss - review article. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997, 26, 3-15.
• 11. Jacobs R., Ghyselen J., Korinckx P., von Steenberghe D.: Long-term bone mass evaluation of mandible and lumbar spine in a group of women receiving hormone replacement therapy. Eur J Oral Sci 1996, 104, 10-16.
• 12. Jeffcoat M.K., Lewis C.E., Reddy M.S., Wang C.Y., Redford M.: Post-menopausal bone loss and its relationship to oral bone loss. Periodontol 2000 2000, 23, 94-102.
• 13. Kim H.J., Zhao H., Kitaura H., Bhattacharyya S., Brewer J.A., Muglia L.J., Ross F.P., Teitelbaum S.L.: Dexamethsone suppresses bone formation via the osteoclast. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007, 602, 43-46.
• 14. Kribbs P.J: Two-year change in mandibular bone mass in an osteoporotic population. J Prosthet Dent 1992, 67, 653-655.
• 15. Kribbs P.J., Chesnut III C.H., Ott S.M., Kilcoyne R.F.: Relationships between mandibular and skeletal bone in an osteoporotic population. J Prosthet Dent 1989, 62, 703-707.
• 16. Krupski W., Tatara M.R.: Interrelationships between densitometric, morphometric, and mechanical properties of the tibia in turkeys. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2007, 51, 621-626.
• 17. Lanham-New S.A.: Importance of calcium, vitamin D and vitamin K for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Proc Nutr Soc 2008, 67, 163-176.
• 18. Olausson H., Laskey M.A., Goldberg G.R., Prentice A.: Changes in bone mineral status and bone size during pregnancy and the influences of body weight and calcium intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2008, 88, 1032-1039.
• 19. Seeman E., Wahne H.W., Offord K.P., Kumar R., Johnson W.J., Riggs B.L.: Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton. J Clin Invest 1982, 69, 1302-1309.
• 20. Śliwa E., Studziński T., Tatara M.R.: Glucocorticoids and the metabolism and skeletal system growth. Medycyna Wet 2006, 62, 377-379.
• 21. Taguchi A., Sanada M., Krall E., Nakamoto T., Ohtsuka M., Suei Y., Tanimoto K., Kodama I., Tsuda M., Ohama K.: Relationship between dental panoramic radiographic findings and biochemical markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18, 1689-1694.
• 22. Tatara M.R., Krupski W., Tymczyna B., Majcher P., Rosenbeiger P., Niedziela D.: Interrelationships between densitometric, morphometric, and mechanical properties of the femur in male Polish Merino sheep. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2011, 55, 795-799.
• 23. Tatara M.R., Śliwa E., Krupski W., Worzakowska M., Studziński T.: Interrelationships between morphometric, densitometric and mechanical properties of lumbar vertebrae in pig. JPCCR 2007, 2, 165-170.
• 24. Ulm C.W., Solar P., Ulm M.R., Matejka M.: Sex-related changes in the bone mineral content of atrophic mandibles. Calcif Tissue Int 1994, 54, 203-207.
• 25. Wowern N.von., Westergaard J., Kollerup G.: Bone mineral content and bone metabolism in young adults with severe periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2001, 28, 583-588.
• 26. Wowern N.von.: Bon mass of mandibles. In vitro and in vivo analyses. Danish Med Bull 1986, 33, 23-44.
• 27. Wowern N. von., Storm T.L., Olgaard K: Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine. Calcif Tissue Int 1988, 2, 157.