PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 69 | 01 |

Tytuł artykułu

Metody oceny skuteczności działania substancji pre-, pro- i synbiotycznych na stan mikroflory przewodu pokarmowego organizmów zwierzęcych

Warianty tytułu

EN
Methods of evaluating the influence of pre-, pro- and symbiotic substances on the gastrointestinal microflora in animals

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
The gastrointestinal tract of animals harbors a large, complex and dynamic microbiome important to the growth and health of livestock animals. This microbiome can be directly modulated, for example by antibiotic treatment or by various bioactive substances. Following the ban on the in-feed use of antibiotic growth promoters in the EU, an increased effort has been put into discovering an alternative in animal production. An indispensable tool for the evaluation of bioactive substances are complex studies combining in vitro and in vivo methods. They consist of precision tests that make it possible to evaluate not only the characteristics of specific strains of bacteria, but also the safety of their application. This paper presents the most important methods for the evaluation and selection of in vitro and in vivo bioactive substances that make it possible to stimulate the gastrointestinal microbiome of animals.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

69

Numer

01

Opis fizyczny

s.21-26,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Katedra Biotechnologii Zwierząt, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana i Jędrzeja Śniadeckich, ul.Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz
  • Katedra Biotechnologii Zwierząt, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana i Jędrzeja Śniadeckich, ul.Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz
  • Katedra Biotechnologii Zwierząt, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana i Jędrzeja Śniadeckich, ul.Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz

Bibliografia

  • 1.Bednarczyk M., Brzezińska J., Sławińska A., Siwek M., Ubranowski M., Kasperczyk K.: Technologia in ovo - narzêdziem w nowoczesnej profilaktyce drobiu. Biotechnol. 2010, 1, 109-118.
  • 2.Bednarczyk M., Urbanowski M., Gulewicz P., Kasperczyk K., Maiorano G., Szwaczkowski T.: Field and in vitro study on prebiotic effect of raffinose family oligosaccharides. Biull. Vet. Instit. Pulawy 2011, 55, 465-469.
  • 3.Bello F. D., Walter J., Hertel C., Hammes W. P.: In vitro study of Prebiotic Properties of Levan-type Exopolysaccharides from Lactobacilli and Non-digestible Carbohydrates Using Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. System. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 24, 232-237.
  • 4.Bielecka M., Biedrzycka E., Majkowska A.: Selection of probiotics and prebiotics for synbiotics and confirmation of their in vivo effectiveness. Food Research Int. 2002, 35, 125-131.
  • 5.Charteris W., Kelly P. M., Morelli L., Collins J. K.: Ingredient selection criteria for probiotic microorganisms in functional dairy foods. Int. J. Dairy Tech. 1998, 51, 123-136.
  • 6.Cinquin C., Le Blay G., Fliss I., Lacroix C.: New three-stage in vitro model for infant colonic fermentation with immobilized fecal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 57, 324-336.
  • 7.Collado M. C., Meriluoto J., Salminen S.: In vitro analysis of probiotic strain combinations to inhibit pathogen adhesion to human intestinal mucus. Food Research Int. 2007, 40, 629-636.
  • 8.Comelli E. M., Guggenheim B., Stingele F., Neeser J. R.: Selection of dairy bacterial strains as probiotics for oral health. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 2002, 110, 218-224.
  • 9.Drouault-Holowacz S., Foligne B., Dennin V., Goudercourt D., Terpend K., Burckel A., Pot B.: Anti-inflammatory potential of the probiotic dietary supplement Lactibiane Tolérance: In vitro and in vivo considerations. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 25, 994-1003.
  • 10.Dunne C., O'Mahony L., Murphy L., Thornton G., Morrissey D., O'Halloran S., Feeney M., Flynn S., Fitzgerald G., Daly C., Kiely B., O'Sullivan G. C., Shanahan F., Collins J. K.: In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 386-392.
  • 11.Ewaschuk J. B., Walker J. W., Diaz H., Madsen K. L.: Bioproduction of conjugated linoleic acid by probiotic bacteria occurs in vitro and in vivo in mice. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1483-1487.
  • 12.Frece J., Kos B., Beganoviæ J., Vukoviæ S., Šuškoviæ J.: In vivo testing of functional properties of three selected probiotic strains. World J. Microbiol. & Biotech. 2005, 21, 1401-1408.
  • 13.Gibson G. R., Fuller R.: Aspects of in vitro and in vivo research approaches directed toward identifying probiotics and prebiotics for human use. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 391-395.
  • 14.Gibson G. R., Wang X.: Regulatory effects of bifidobacteria on the growth of other colonic bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1994, 77, 412-420.
  • 15.Gomez-Gil B., Roque A., Turnbull J. F.: The use and selection of probiotic bacteria for use in the culture of larval aquatic organisms. Aquacult. 2000, 191, 259-270.
  • 16.He F., Ouwehand A. C., Isolauri E., Hashimoto H., Benno Y., Salminen S.: Comparison of mucosal adhesion and species identification of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy and allergic infants. FEMS Immunol. Medical Microbiol. 2001, 30, 43-47.
  • 17.Jacobsen N. C., Rosenfeldt Nielsen V., Hayford A. E., Møller P. L., Michaelsen K. F., Pærregaard A., Sandström B., Tvede M., Jakobsen M.: Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl. and Environmental Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4949-4956.
  • 18.Koenen M. E., Hulst R. van der., Leering M., Jeurissen S. H. M., Boersma W. J. A.: Development and validation of a new in vitro assay for selection of probiotic bacteria that express immune-stimulating properties in chickens in vivo. FEMS Immunol. Medical Microbiol. 2004, 40, 119-127.
  • 19.Kos B., Šušković J., Beganović J., Gjuračić K., Frece J., Iannaccone C., Canganella F.: Characterization of the three selected probiotic strains for the application in food industry. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 699-707.
  • 20.Laparra J. M., Sanz Y.: Comparison of in vitro models to study bacterial adhesion to the intestinal epithelium. Letters in Applied Microbiol. 2009, 49, 695-701.
  • 21.Macfarlane G. T., Macfarlane S., Gibson G. R.: Validation of a Three-Stage Compound Continuous Culture System for Investigating the Effect of Retention Time on the Ecology and Metabolism of Bacteria in the Human Colon. Microb. Ecol. 1998, 35, 180-187.
  • 22.Mäkivuokko H. A., Saarinen M. T., Ouwehand A. C., Rautonen N. E.: Effects of lactose on colon microbial community structure and function in a four-stage semi-continuous culture system. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 2056-2063.
  • 23.Mandalari G., Faulks R. M., Bisignano C., Waldron K. W., Narbad A., Wickham M. S. J.: In vitro evaluation of the prebiotic properties ofalmond skins (Amygdalus communis L.). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 304, 116-122.
  • 24.Minekus M., Smeets-Peeters M., Bernalier A., Marol-Bonnin S., Havenaar R., Marteau P., Alric M., Fonty G., Huis in’t Veld J. H. J.: A computer-controlled system to simulate conditions of the large intestine with peristaltic mixing, water absorption and absorption of fermentation products. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 53, 108-114.
  • 25.Molly K., Woestyne M. V., Verstraete W.: Development of a 5-step multichamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1993, 39, 254-258.
  • 26.Morelli L.: In vitro selection of probiotic Lactobacilli: A critical appraisal. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2000, 1, 59-67.
  • 27.Nilsson U., Öste R., Jägerstad M., Birkhed D.: Cereal fructans: in vitro and in vivo studies on availability in rats and humans. J. Nutr. 1988, 118, 1325-1330.
  • 28.Ogué-Bon E., Khoo C., McCartney A. L., Gibson G. R., Rastall R. A.: Invitro effects of synbiotic fermentation on the canine faecal microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010, 73, 587-600.
  • 29.Olano-Martin E., Mountzouris K. C., Gibson G. R., Rastall R. A.: In vitro fermentability of dextran, oligodextran and maltodextrin by human gut bacteria. British J. Nutr. 2000, 83, 247-255.
  • 30.O'Sullivan D. J.: Methods for analysis of the intestinal microflora. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2000, 1, 39-50.
  • 31.Pilarski R., Bednarczyk M., Lisowski M., Rutkowski A., Bernacki Z., Gulewicz K.: Prebiotic activity of á-galactosides injected during embryogenesis on selected chicken traits. Folia biol. 2005, 53, 13-20.
  • 32.Poljak Z.: Zoonotic diseases from pigs. Proc. London Swine Confer. 2009, 95-103.
  • 33.Pompei A., Cordisco L., Raimondi S., Amaretti A., Pagnoni U. M., Matteuzzi D., Rossi M.: In vitro comparison of the prebiotic effects of two inulin-type fructans. Anaerobe. 2008, 14, 280-286.
  • 34.Roberfroid M.: Prebiotics: the concept revisited. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 830-837.
  • 35.Roy D.: Media for the isolation and enumeration of bifidobacteria in dairy products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 69, 167-182.
  • 36.Rycroft C. E., Jones M. R., Gibson G. R., Rastall R. A.: A comparative in vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 878-887.
  • 37.Saarela M., Mogensen G., Fondén R., Mättö J., Mattila-Sandholm T.: Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J. Biotech. 2000, 84, 197-215.
  • 38.Schmidt M., Olejnik-Schmidt A.: Metody selekcji mikroorganizmów o właściwościach prbiotycznych. Technika-Technologia 2010, 64, 40-44.
  • 39.Shortt C.: The probiotic century: historical and current perspectives. Trends in Food Sci. & Technol. 1999, 10, 411-417.
  • 40.Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A. C.: Selection of enterococci for potential canine probiotic additives. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 100, 107-114.
  • 41.Tuohy K. M., Finlay R. K., Wynne A. G., Gibson G. R.: A human volunteer study on the prebiotic effects of HP-inulin - faecal bacteria enumerated using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Anaerobe. 2001, 7, 113-118.
  • 42.Tzortzis G., Goulas A. K., Gee J. M., Gibson G. R.: A novel galactooligosaccharide mixture increases the bifidobacterial population numbers in a continuous in vitro fermentation system and in the proximal colonic contents of pigs in vivo. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1726-1731.
  • 43.Vaugien L., Prevots F., Roques C.: Bifidobacteria identification based on 16S rRNA and pyruvate kinase partial gene sequence analysis. Anaerobe. 2002, 8, 341-344.
  • 44.Vesterlund S., Paltta J., Karp M., Ouwehand A. C.: Measurement of bacterial adhesion-in vitro evaluation of different methods. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2005, 60, 225-233.
  • 45.Villaluenga C. M., Wardeñska M., Pilarski R., Bednarczyk M., Gulewicz K.: Utilization of chicken embryo model for assessment of biological activity of different oligosaccharides. Folia biol. 2004, 52, 135-142.
  • 46.Walter J., Tannock G. W., Tilsala-Timisjarvi A., Rodtong S., Loach D. M., Munro K., Alatossava T.: Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 297-303.
  • 47.Zhang F., Hang X., Fan X., Li G., Yang H.: Selection and optimization procedure of synbiotic for cholesterol removal. Anaerobe. 2007, 13, 185-192.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-719af2b2-77a0-4ad9-aace-b8ede2985b6e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.