Comparative chromosomal studies in Rhinolophus formosae and R. luctus from china and Vietnam: elevation of R. l. lanosus to species rank

• Autorzy: Volleth M. , So N.T. , Wu Y. , Li Y. , Yu W. , Lin L.-K. , Arai S. , Trifonov V. , Liehr T. , Harada M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For the majority of Rhinolophus species a karyotype consisting of either 58 or 62 chromosomes was reported. The members of the R. trifoliatus clade are therefore distinguished from other rhinolophids by low diploid chromosome numbers (2n) and a high rate of chromosomal changes. Recently, based on cytogenetic characters, a cryptic species, R. luctoides, was described and a subspecies, R. luctusmorio, was elevated to species rank. In the present work, the karyotypes of a male bat from Vietnam and a female one from China, both classified as R. luctus by morphological characters, were studied by G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization with whole chromosome painting probes derived from Aselliscus stoliczkanus. In the male specimen from Vietnam, the composition of the 15 autosomal bi-armed pairs (2n = 32, FN = 60) is identical to that of R. luctoides from Malaysia. For reason of differences in body size and baculum length as well as in skull morphology, this specimen is provisionally treated as R. cf. luctoides. The karyotype of the female specimen from Sichuan province, China, differs from R. luctoides by a whole arm reciprocal translocation resulting in an altered arm composition of pairs 3 and 4. For this reason, the elevation of the Chinese subspecies of R. luctus, i.e. R. lanosus, to species rank is suggested. The karyotype of the endemic Taiwanese species R. formosae with a diploid number of 2n = 52 is mainly composed of acrocentric autosomal pairs. Of the five bi-armed pairs, only the two smallest show the same arm composition as found in the 2n = 32 karyotypes of other members of the R. trifoliatus clade. The composition of the remaining three bi-armed pairs is unique and represents an apomorphic feature for R. formosae.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.41-50,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Volleth M.

• Department of Human Genetics, Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany

autor

So N.T.

• Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources and Graduate University of Sciences and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Wu Y.

• College of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, 230 Wei Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China

autor

Li Y.

• Marine College, Shandong University, Weihai, 264209, China

autor

Yu W.

• College of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, 230 Wei Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China

autor

Lin L.-K.

• Laboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biology, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4. Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung 40704, Taiwan

autor

Arai S.

• Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan

autor

Trifonov V.

• Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Kollegiengasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany

autor

Liehr T.

• Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of RAS, 8 Ac. Lavrentieva Avenue, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

autor

Harada M.

• Laboratory Animal Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Abeno, Osaka 545-8585, Japan

Bibliografia

• 1. Agnarsson, I., C. M. Zambrana-Torrelio, N. P. Flores-Saldana, and L. J. May-Collado. 2011. A time-calibrated species-level phylogeny of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia). PLoS Currents, 3: RRN1212. Google Scholar
• 2. Agrawal, V. C., and Y. P. Sinha. 1973. Studies on the bacula of some oriental bats. Anatomischer Anzeiger, 133: 180–192. Google Scholar
• 3. Andersen, K. 1905. On the bats of the Rhinolophus philippinensis group, with descriptions of five new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 16: 243–257. Google Scholar
• 4. Andō, K., T. Tagawa, and T. A. Uchida. 1980. Karyotypes of Taiwanese and Japanese bats belonging to the families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae. Cytologia, 45: 423–432. Google Scholar
• 5. Ao, L., X. Gu, Q. Feng, J. Wang, P. C. M. O'Brien, B. Fu, X. Mao, W. Su, Y. Wang, M. Volleth , et al. 2006. Karyotype relationships of six bat species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from China revealed by chromosome painting and G-banding comparison. Cytogenetic Genome Research, 115: 145–153. Google Scholar
• 6. Corbet, G. B., and J. E. Hill. 1992. The mammals of the Indomalayan region: a systematic review. Ox ford University Press, New York, viii + 488 pp. Google Scholar
• 7. Csorba, G., P. Ujhelyi, and N. Thomas. 2003. Horseshoe bats of the world (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae). Alana Books, Bishop's Castle, UK, 160 pp. Google Scholar
• 8. Dool, S. E., S. J. Puechmaille, N. M. Foley, B. Allegrini, A. Bastian, G. L. Mutumi, T. G. Maluleke, L. J. Odendaal, E. C. Teeling, and D. S. Jacobs. 2016. Nuclear introns outperform mitochondrial DNA in inter-specific phylogenetic reconstruction: lessons from horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae: Chiroptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 97: 196–212. Google Scholar
• 9. Guillén Servent, A., C. M. Francis, and R. E. Ricklefs. 2003. Phylogeny and biogeography of the horseshoe bats. Pp. xii–xxiv, in Horseshoe bats of the World (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) ( G. Csorba, P. Ujhelyi, and N. Thomas, eds.). Alana Books, Bishop's Castle, UK, 160 pp. Google Scholar
• 10. Harada, M., S. Yenbutra, T. H. Yosida, and S. Takada. 1985. Cytogenetical study of Rhinolophus bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) from Thailand. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 61B: 455–458. Google Scholar
• 11. Heller, K.-G., and M. Volleth. 1988. Fledermäuse aus Malaysia. 1. Beobachtungen zur Biologie, Morphologie und Taxonomie (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Senckenbergiana Biologica, 69: 243–276. Google Scholar
• 12. Hendrichsen, D. K., P. J. J. Bates, B. D. Hayes, and J. L. Walston. 2001. Recent records of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Vietnam with six species new to the country. Myotis, 39: 35–122. Google Scholar
• 13. Hood, C. S., D. A. Schlitter, J. I. Georgudaki, S. Yenbutra, and R. J. Baker. 1988. Chromosomal studies of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Thailand. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 57: 99–109. Google Scholar
• 14. Koopman, K. F. 1994. Chiroptera: Systematics. Handbook of Zoology. Volume VIII. Mammalia. Part 60 ( J. Niethammer, H. Schliemann, and D. Starck, eds.). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, vii + 224 pp. Google Scholar
• 15. Koubínová, D., K. S. Sreepada, P. Koubek, and J. Zima. 2010. Karyotypic variation in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae). Acta Chiropterologica, 12: 393–400. Google Scholar
• 16. Li, G., G. Jones, S. J. Rossiter, S.-F. Chen, S. Parsons, and S. Zhang. 2006. Phylogenetics of small horseshoe bats from East Asia based on mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 1234–1240. Google Scholar
• 17. Mao, X., W. Nie, J. Wang, W. Su, L. Ao, Q. Feng, Y. Wang, M. Volleth, and F. Yang. 2007. Karyotype evolution in Rhinolophus bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) illuminated by cross-species chromosome painting and G-banding comparison. Chromosome Research, 15: 835–848. Google Scholar
• 18. Naidu, K. N., and M. E. Gururaj. 1984. Karyotype of Rhinolophus luctus (Order: Chiroptera). Current Science, 53: 825–826. Google Scholar
• 19. Schweizer, D. 1976. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with Chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma, 58: 307–324. Google Scholar
• 20. Simmons, N. B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 312–529, in Mammal species of the World. A taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edition ( D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2142 pp. Google Scholar
• 21. Smith, A. T., and Y. Xie (eds.). 2008. A guide to the mammals of China. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 544 pp. Google Scholar
• 22. Soisook, P., M. J. Struebig, S. Noerfahmy, H. Bernard, I. Maryanto, S.-F. Chen, S. J. Rossiter, H.-C. Kuo, K. Deshpande, P. J. J. Bates , et al. 2015. Description of a new species of the Rhinolophus trifoliatus-group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from South-East Asia. Acta Chiropterologica, 17: 21–36. Google Scholar
• 23. Tate, G. H. H. 1943. Results of the Archbold Expeditions No. 49. Further notes on the Rhinolophus philippinensis group (Chiroptera). American Museum Novitates, 1219: 1–5. Google Scholar
• 24. Topál, G., and G. Csorba. 1992. The subspecific division of Rhinolophus luctus Temminck, 1835, and the taxonomic status of R. beddomei Andersen, 1905 (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica, 7: 101–116. Google Scholar
• 25. Volleth, M. 1987. Differences in the location of nucleolus organizer regions in European vespertilionid bats. Cytogenetics Cell Genetics, 44: 186–197. Google Scholar
• 26. Volleth, M., R. Van Den Bussche, and R. J. Baker. 2009. Karyo typing and studying chromosomes of bats. Pp. 757–771, in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd edition ( T. H. Kunz and S. Parsons, eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 901 pp. Google Scholar
• 27. Volleth, M., J. Loidl, F. Mayer, H.-S. Yong, S. Muller, and K.-G. Heller. 2015. Surprising genetic diversity in Rhinolophus luctus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Peninsular Malaysia: description of a new species based on genetic and morphological characters. Acta Chiropterologica, 17: 1–20. Google Scholar
• 28. Xu, H., Y. Yuan, Q. He, Q. Wu, Q. Yan, and Q. Wang. 2012. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two Chiroptera species (Rhinolophus luctus and Hipposideros armiger). Mitochondrial DNA, 327–328. Google Scholar
• 29. Yoshiyuki, M., and M. Harada, 1995. Taxonomic status of Rhinolophus formosae Sanborn, 1939 (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) from Taiwan. Special Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Coleopterology, 4: 497–504. Google Scholar
• 30. Zhang, Y.-X., Z.-X. Liu, H. Zhong, P.-Y. Hua, S.-Y. Zhang, and L.-B. Zhang. 2008. A new record of woolly horseshoe bat Rhinolophus luctus in Hunan Province. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 43: 141–144. Google Scholar
• 31. Zima, J., M. Volleth, I. Horáček, J. Červeny, A. Červená, K. Průcha, and M. Macholán. 1992. Comparative karyology of rhinolophid bats. Pp. 229–236, in Prague studies in mammalogy ( I. Horáček and V. Vohralík, eds.). Charles University Press, Prague, 245 pp. Google Scholar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15081109ACC2017.19.1.003