Thermographic evaluation of the effect of cellulose added to straw litter on the temperature of bedding

• Autorzy: Slobodzian-Ksenicz O. , Bojarski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cellulose; straw; litter; thermovision; turkey; bedding; moisture; straw bedding; thermal property; animal husbandry

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Animal Husbandry
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 17
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume17/issue3/art-09.html

Twórcy

autor

Slobodzian-Ksenicz O.

• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Zielona Gora, Prof. Szafrana 15, 65-516 Zielona Gora, Poland

autor

Bojarski J.

• Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Econometrics, University of Zielona Gora, Prof. Szafrana 15, 65-516 Zielona Gora, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Agfact A5.1.9 (First edition 1987. Reviewed April 2004), 2004. Alternative litter materials for poultry. I.S. Embury, former, livestock officer (poultry) division of animal production.
• 2. Atapattu N.S.B.M, Wickramasinghe K.P., 2007. The use of refused tea as litter material for broiler chickens. Poultry Science Association, 86, 968–972.
• 3. Bieda W., Nawalany G., 2006. Effect of broiler-house stocking density on temperature of bedding and thermal conditions in the living area of bird. Annals of Animal Science, 6(2), 321–330.
• 4. Chatillon G., 1999. Ściółka ze słomy z dodatkiem preparatu bakteryjnego jest opłacalna [Straw litter with the addition of bacterial preparation is profitable]. Pigs Journal, 12, 100–101 [in Polish].
• 5. Collective work, 2000. Standardy higieniczne, dobrostan zwierząt oraz ochrona środowiska w produkcji zwierzęcej w świetle przepisów UE. [Hygienic standards, animal welfare and environment protection in animal production in the light of EU prescriptions]. F.P.H. ELMA. Wrocław, pp 78 [in Polish].
• 6. Coufal C.D., Chavez C., Niemeyer P.R., Carey J.B., 2006. Nitrogen emissions from broilers measured by mass balance over eighteen consecutive flocks. Poultry Science. 85(3), 384–391.
• 7. Fleming K., Hessel E.F., Van den Weghe H.F.A., 2009. Gas and particle concentrations in horse stables with individual boxes as a function of the bedding material and the mucking regimen. Journal of Animal Science, 87(11), 3805–3816.
• 8. Grimes J.L., Smith J., Williams C.M., 2002. Some alternative litter materials used for growing broilers and turkeys. World's Poultry Science Journal, 58, 515–526.
• 9. Knížatová M., Mihina Š., Brouček J., Karandušovská I., Mačuhová J., 2010. The influence of litter age, litter temperature and ventilation rate on ammonia emissions from a broiler rearing facility. Czech Journal Animal Science, 55, 337–345.
• 10. Malone B., 2006. Managing built-up litter. Proceedings to 2006 Midwest Poultry Federation Conference.
• 11. Mazanowski A., 1997. Czynniki wpływające na efektywność odchowu kurcząt brojlerów. [Factors influencing the growing of broiler chickens]. Polish Poultry, 4, 16–20 [in Polish].
• 12. Radoń J., Bieda W., Nawalany G., 2004. Broiler house microclimate in light of experimental studies. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, 7(2), #04,
• 13. Radoń J., 2005. Prognozowanie kształtowania się mikroklimatu budynków inwentarskich – możliwości i ograniczenia. [Forecasting microclimate development in livestock buildings – possibilities and limitations]. Agricultural Engineering, 7, 245–253 [in Polish].
• 14. Ritz C.W., Fairchild B.D., Lacy M.P., 2005. Litter quality and broiler performance. Bulletin 1267. University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
• 15. Rudzik F., 1998. Zoohigieniczne badania nad wykorzystaniem kaolinu i zeolitu do optymalizacji warunków utrzymania kurcząt. [Zoohygienic study on the use of kaolin and zeolite for the optimization of chicken management conditions]. Scientific Papers of Agricultural University Wrocław. 350, 101–119 [in Polish].
• 16. Słobodzian-Ksenicz O., Kuczyński T., Hoszka H., 2005. Ocena własności termicznych materiałów ściółkowych stosowanych w produkcji drobiarskiej na podstawie zdjęć termowizyjnych. [Evaluating the thermal properties of bedding materials used in poultry production as based on thermovision images]. Problems of Agricultural Engineering, 1, 99–106 [in Polish].
• 17. Słobodzian-Ksenicz O., Houszka H., Michalski A., 2010. The effect of cellulose addend to straw bedding on turkeys’ welfare and production results. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 28(4), 397–406.
• 18. Słobodzian-Ksenicz O., Suchowska-Kisielewicz M., Lipnicki Z., Kuczyński T., 2013. Heat flow inside a litter during turkey rearing. Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 116, 46–50.
• 19. Skomorucha I., Muchacka R., Sosnówka-Czajka E., Herbut E., 2009. Response of broiler chickens from three genetic groups to different stocking densities. Annals of Animal Science, 9(2), 175–184.
• 20. Sobczak J., Waligóra T., 2010. Podłoża w kurniku jako element dobrostanu. [Hen house bedding types as an element of bird welfare]. Polish Poultry, 11, 23–27 [in Polish].