PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 20 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

A comparison of reaction times of boys and girls aged 10-11 and 14-15 years

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Introduction. Pubescence is a life stage with the most turbulent progression of sensorimotor abilities during the transformation of a child into an adult. Differences in all sensorimotor abilities between boys and girls are become significant at this age. The progression of reaction abilities in girls decreases at this age (girls achieve peak values around the age of 15), while the reaction abilities in boys keep improving into adolescence. Younger children compared to adults and older children show a reduced ability to perform one or more tasks concurrently with a movement task. Aim of Study. The purpose of the study was to determine the time of complex reaction of the lower limbs of children. Moreover, a relationship between reaction time, age and gender was also found. Material and Methods. The research group included 81 primary school students aged 10-15 years. Subjects were divided into four groups according to age and gender (Group 1 – 9.8 to 10.8-year-old girls, n = 20; Group 2 – 10.0 to 10.7-year-old boys, n = 19; Group 3 – 14.3 to 15.3-year-old girls, n = 21; and Group 4 – 14.2 to 15.2-year-old boys, n = 21). The measurements were carried out using the FiTRO Agility Check test. A two-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the groups. The significance level was adjusted to 0.05. Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to determine differences between pairs of groups. Results. There are significant differences between the boys and girls aged 14-15 years. Other differences between boys and girls aged 10-11 years were not statistically significant, however, girls performed with slightly shorter reaction times. Conclusions. The research showed a significant relationship between age and complex reaction speed in the age group of 14-15 of boys and girls. This study helps to prove that boys do not have shorter complex reaction times than girls aged 10-11 years.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

20

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.147-152,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department ofBiomedical Laboratory, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
autor
  • Department of Athletics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
autor
  • Department ofBiomedical Laboratory, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Department of Theory of Sport, University School of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland
autor
  • Department ofBiomedical Laboratory, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
autor
  • Department of Sport Management, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

  • 1. Spodek B, Saracho O. The handbook of research on the education of young children, second edition. Routledge. 2006.
  • 2. Abernethy B. The biophysical foundations of human movement. Edward Brothers, USA. 2005.
  • 3. Oliver O, Meyers W. Reliability and generality of measures of acceleration, planned agility and reactive agility. Int J Sports Physiol Performance. 2009; 4: 345-354.
  • 4. Riegerova J, Pridalova M, Ulbrichova M. Aplikace fyzicke antropologie v telesne vychove a sportu. 3. vyd. Hanex, Olomouc. 2006.
  • 5. Hirose N, Hirano A, Fukubayashi T. Biological maturity and choice reaction time in Japanese adolescent soccer players. Res Sport Med. 2004; 12: 45-68.
  • 6. Fozard J, Vercruyssen M, Reynolds S. Age differences and changes in reaction time: The Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(4): 179-189.
  • 7. McMorris T, Keen P. Effect of exercise on simple reaction times of recreational athletes. Percept Motor Skills. 1994; 78(1): 123-130.
  • 8. Brebner T. Reaction time in personality theory. In: Welford T, ed., Reaction times. Academic Press, NY. 1980; 309-320.
  • 9. Welford T. Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In: Welford T, ed., Reaction times. Academic Press, NY. 1980; 73-128.
  • 10. Jakobs O, Wang E, Dafotakis M, Grefkes C, Zilles K, Eickhoff S. Effects of timing and movement uncertainty implicate the temporoparietal junction in the prediction of forthcoming motor actions. Neuro Image. 2009; 47(2): 667-677.
  • 11. Zemkova E, Hamar D. Towards an understanding of agility performance. Albert, Boskovice. 2009.
  • 12. Bartunkova S. Fyziologie cloveka a telesnych cviceni. Karolinum, Praha. 2006.
  • 13. Darlot C, Zupan L. Etard O, Denise P, Maruani A. computation of inverse dynamics for the control movements. Biol Cybernethic. 1996; 75(2): 173-186.
  • 14. Stulrajter V. Reakcny cas ako ukazovatel' adaptacie na zat'azenie v sporte. Acta Facult Educ Physic Univ Comenianae. 1987; 25: 73-128.
  • 15. Dovalil J, et al. Vykon a trenink ve sportu. Praha: Olympia, Praha. 2002.
  • 16. Sheppard M, Young B. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(9): 919-932.
  • 17. Hodgkins F. Reaction time and speed of movement in males and females of various ages. Res Q. Am Assoc Health, Physical Edu Recreation. 1963; 34(3): 335-343.
  • 18. Davis B. Physical education and the study of sport. 4th ed. Spain: Harcourt. 2000.
  • 19. Koen P, Lemmink A, Kemper H, Mathieu H, De Greef G, Rispens P, Stevens M. Reliability of the Groningen fitness test for the elderly. J Aging Phys Activity. 2001; 9: 194-212.
  • 20. Fitronic manual of FiTRO Agility check test [http:// www.fitronic.sk/fitro_agility_check.htm, 20.02.2013].
  • 21. Hamar D, Zemkova E. Test disjunktivnych reakcnorychlostnych schopnosti dolnych koncatin. Med Sport Boh Slov. 1998; 7(3): 74-78.
  • 22. Kisilev S, Espy K, Sheffield T. Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009; 102(2): 150-166.
  • 23. Debrabant J, Gheysen F, Vingerhoets G, Waelverde H. Age-related differences in predictive response timing in children: Evidence from regularly relative to irregularly paced reaction time performance. 2012; 31(4): 801-810.
  • 24. Der G, Deary J. Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom health and lifestyle survey. Psychol Aging. 2006; 21(1): 62-73.
  • 25. Silverman W. Sex differences in simple visual reaction time: a historical meta-analysis (sports events). Sex Roles: J Res. 2006; 54(1-2): 57-69.
  • 26. Sternberg J, Nigro G. Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Develop. 1980; 51: 27-38.
  • 27. Kail R. Developmental changes in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychol Bull. 1991; 109: 490-501.
  • 28. Luchies W, Schiffman J, Richards G, Thompson M, Bazuin D, Deyoung J. Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly. J Geront, Series A. 2002; 57(4): 246.
  • 29. Christenson G, Winkelstein A. Visual skills of athletes versus nonathletes: development of a sports vision testing battery. J Am Optometric Assoc. 1988; 59(9): 666-675.
  • 30. Nakamoto H, Mori S. Sport-specific decision-making in a go/no go reaction task: difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players. Percept Motor Skills. 2008; 106(1): 163-171.
  • 31. Vänttinen T, Blomquist M, Luhtanen P, Häkkinen K. Effects of age and soccer expertise on general tests of perceptual and motor performance among adolescent soccer players. Percept Motor Skills. 2010; 110: 675¬692.
  • 32. Ward P, Williams A, Loran D. The development ofvisual function in expert and novice soccer players. Int J Sport Vision. 2000; 6: 1-11.
  • 33. Little T, Williams A. Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(1): 76-78.
  • 34. Schmidt R, Wrisberg C. Motor learning and performance: a situation-based learning approach, 4th ed., Human Kinetics, Champaign. 2008.
  • 35. Jaworski J, Tchorzewski D, Bujas P. Involution of simple and complex reaction times among people aged between 21 and 80 - the results of computer tests. Human Movement. 2011; 12(2): 153-158.
  • 36. Fitronic (2013) [http://www.fitronic.sk/en/index. php?action=sec&id=32, 21.3.2013].
  • 37. Brychta P, Hojka V, Stockinger M. Disjunktivni reakcni rychlost dolnich koncetin u chlapcu starsiho skolniho veku. Ceska kinantropologie. 2012; 16(4): 103-110.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-57ccbf2c-21ad-4489-8b99-28232239ddb2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.