PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 25 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Bi-Level decision-making Approach for GHG emissions control and municipal solid waste management under parameter uncertainty: a case study in Beijing, China

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) management significantly contribute to high global warming potential (GWP). However, most studies have failed to facilitate identifying MSW management schemes capable of comprehensively meeting the goals from decision-makers at different hierarchical levels under uncertainties. This study develops an inexact bi-level linear programming (IBLP) model for collaborative control of GHG emissions and waste management in Beijing: MGU-MCL. The MGU-MCL model implies a leader-follower decision process, with the environmental sector providing the upper-level objective and the local authority dominating the lower-level objective. Then, an interactive fuzzy possiblistic approach is introduced to represent the satisfactory degrees of different decision-making levels. Results show that the MGU-MCL model decisions would reduce GHG emissions by about 9%, but increase management costs by 4% compared with the decisions from conventional models; the contribution of the landfill facilities to GHG emissions would be predominant, especially methane emissions; while the composting and incineration facilities would account for a large proportion of management cost. Further comparative analysis among the bi-level and single-level models indicates that the bi-level model could provide coordinated schemes under an integrated consideration of economic efficiency and environmental impact.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

25

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.1435-1451,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
autor
  • School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
autor
  • School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
autor
  • School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Bibliografia

  • 1. CHEN C.W., HUANG G.H. Artificial intelligence for management and control of pollution minimization and mitigation processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16, 75, 2003.
  • 2. CORSTEN M., WORRELL E., ROUR M., DUIN A. The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in the 26 Netherlands. Resources Conservation and Recycling 77, 13, 2013.
  • 3. HE L., HUANG G.H., LU H.W. Bivariate interval semiinfinite programming with an application to environmental decision-making analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 211, 452, 2011a.
  • 4. LU H.W., HUANG G.H., XU Y., HE L. Inexact two-phase fuzzy programming and its application to municipal solid waste management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25, 1529, 2012.
  • 5. BATOOL S.A., CHUADHRY M.N. The impact of municipal solid waste treatment methods on greenhouse gas emissions in Lahore, Pakistan. Waste Management 29, 63, 2009.
  • 6. LIAMSANGUAN C., GHEEWALA S.H. The holistic impact of integrated solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in Phuket. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 1865, 2008.
  • 7. BRASCHEL N., POSCH A. A review of system boundaries of GHG emission inventories in waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 44, 30, 2013.
  • 8. PARK S.W., CHOI J.H., PARK J.W. The estimation of N2O emissions from municipal solid waste incineration facilities: The Korea case. Waste Management 31, 1765, 2011.
  • 9. MOHAREB A.K., WARITH M.A., DIAZ R. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management strategies in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52, 1241, 2008.
  • 10. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  • 11. LU H.W., SUN S.C., REN L.X., HE L. GHG emission control and solid waste management for megacities with inexact inputs: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 284, 92, 2015.
  • 12. WANG Y., HE Y., YAN B.B., MA W.C., HAN M. Collaborative emission reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and municipal solid waste management: case study of Tianjin. Procedia Environmental Sciences 16, 75, 2012.
  • 13. EL-FADEL M., SBAYTI H. Economics of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste in Lebanon. Waste Manage Research 18, 329, 2000.
  • 14. WEITZ K.A., THORNELOE S.A., NISHTALA S.R., ZANNES M. The impact of municipal solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 52, 1000, 2011.
  • 15. LI Y.P., HUANG G.H. An interval-based possibilistic programming method for waste management with cost minimization and environmental-impact abatement under uncertainty. Science of the Total Environment 408, 4296, 2010.
  • 16. CHANG N.B., QI C., ISLAM K., HOSSAIN F. Comparisons between global warming potential and cost-benefit criteria for optimal planning of a municipal solid waste management system. Journal of Cleaner Production 20, 1, 2012.
  • 17. ZHAO W., HIPPES G., VOET E.V.D. Eco-efficiency for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation of municipal solid waste management: A case study of Tianjin, China. Waste Management 31, 1407, 2011.
  • 18. LU H.W., HUANG G.H., HE L., ZENG G.M. An inexact dynamic optimization model for municipal solid waste management in association with greenhouse gas emission control. Journal of environmental management 90, 396, 2009.
  • 19. SU J., XI B.D., LIU H.L., JIANG Y.H., WARITH M.A. An inexact multi-objective dynamic model and its application in China for the management of municipal solid waste. Waste Management 28, 2532, 2008.
  • 20. MAVROTAS G., SKOULAXINOU S., GAKIS N., KATSOUROS V., GEORGOPOULOU E. A multi-objective programming model for assessment the GHG emissions in MSW management. Waste Management 33, 1934, 2013.
  • 21. CALVETE H.I., GALE C. Linear bilevel programs with multiple objectives at the upper level. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 234, 950, 2010.
  • 22. AVISO K.B., TAN R.R., CULABA A.B., CRUZ JR J.B., Bi-level fuzzy optimization approach for water exchange in eco-industrial parks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 88, 31, 2010.
  • 23. GANG J., TU Y., LEV B., XU J.P., SHEN W.J., YAO L.M. A multi-objective bi-level location planning problem for stone industrial parks. Computers & Operations Research 56, 8, 2015.
  • 24. TAHA A.F., HACHEM N.A., PANCHAL J.H. A Quasi-Feed-In-Tariff policy formulation in micro-grids: A bi-level multi-period approach. Energy Policy 71, 63, 2014.
  • 25. HE L., HUANG G.H., LU H.W. Greenhouse gas emissions control in integrated municipal solid waste management through mixed integer bilevel decision-making. Journal of Hazardous Materials 193, 112, 2011b.
  • 26. KALASHNIKOV V.V., PEREZ-VALDES G.A., TOMASGARD A., KALASHNYKOVA N.I. Natural gas cash-out problem: Bilevel stochastic optimization approach. European Journal of Operational Research 206, 18, 2010.
  • 27. XIE Y.L., LI Y.P., HUANG G.H., CHEN L.R. An inexact chance-constrained programming model for water quality management in Binhai New Area of Tianjin, China. Science of the Total Environment 409, 1757, 2011.
  • 28. DAI C., LI Y.P., HUANG G.H. A two-stage support-vectorregression optimization model for municipal solid waste management – A case study of Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 3023, 2011.
  • 29. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS), China Statistical Yearbook 2004-2013. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. 2005–2014 (in Chinese).
  • 30. SHIH H.S., LEE E.S. A fuzzy possibilistic approach to multi-level optimization. The Eighth Annual Industrial Engineering Research Conference 23, 1999.
  • 31. KASPERSKI A. A possibilistic approach to sequencing problems with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 150, 77, 2005.
  • 32. EMAM O.E. A fuzzy approach for bi-level integer nonlinear programming problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation 172, 62, 2006.
  • 33. HUANG G.H., BAETZ B.W., PARTY G.G. Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 83, 594, 1995.
  • 34. BELLMAN R.E., ZADEH L.A. Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Mgmt. Sci. 17B, 141, 1970.
  • 35. MAQSOOD I., HUANG G.H., YEOMANS J.S. An intervalparameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 167, 208, 2005.
  • 36. GUO P., HUANG G.H. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties. Waste Management 30, 521, 2010

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-54dcaf0a-f2ca-4e30-b67c-c543d1f12303
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.