PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2017 | 161 | 03 |

Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ sposobu przygotowania gleby na cechy odnowienia naturalnego sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) w Nadleśnictwie Spychowo

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

EN
Effect of mechanical site preparation methods on characteristics of the natural regeneration of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Spychowo Forest District

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Mechanical site preparation is recommended to create optimum conditions for seed germination and seedling growth in a clear−cut area. Lack of soil scarification or less−intense methods may be more suitable from an environmental point of view, but can result in a failure to obtain natural regeneration. This study compared the effects of three mechanical site preparation methods (SPM) characterized by different levels of soil scarification (i.e. double mould−board forest plough (LPz), active plough (PA) or forest mill (FL)), as well as a control variant without mechanical site preparation, on height, density, spatial distribution and survival among naturally regenerating Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the first 2 years of growth in a clear−cut area of NE Poland. The experiment was based around a four−block randomized block design involving the four variants. Seedling height was measured at the end of the first and second growing seasons, with measurements performed on 8 meter−wide transects extending across the entire width of the cleat−cut. We found no effect of SPM on seedling height, though the density of seedlings regenerating naturally was found to be dependent. After two years, the highest density was achieved in the PA variant (8.1 seedlings/m²) and the FL variant (7.0 seedlings/m²). A significantly lower density characterized the LPz variant (5.1 seedlings/m²) and the lowest of all the variant without soil scarification (3.2 seedlings/m²). The most homogeneous natural regeneration was achieved following the use of PA (2.6% of 1 m² plots without seedlings after two growing seasons), while the least homogeneous was the variant without soil scarification (22.4% of 1 m² plots). Survival of pines after the second growing seasons was quite high (over 80%), and did not differ significantly depending on the SPM. Our research therefore confirmed that, in the absence of mechanical site preparation, natural regeneration of sufficient density and homogeneity cannot be obtained. The best natural regeneration was obtained on sites prepared with PA, and FL scarification being only slightly less favorable. The low density and uneven distribution of seedlings on the soil prepared with LPz was a surprising result. The probable reason for this lay in the high precipitation in the first growing season. On one hand, this provided very good moisture conditions for seed germination and seedling growth on a substrate with high porosity in the PA and FL variants, but on the other the high bulk density of mineral soil in the LPz variant led to oxygen deficit.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

161

Numer

03

Opis fizyczny

s.196-207,rys.,tab.,wykr.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

  • Katedra Ochrony Lasu i Ekologii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa
  • Katedra Hodowli Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa
autor
  • Nadleśnictwo Spychowo, ul.Mazurska 3, 12-150 Spychowo
autor
  • Katedra Hodowli Lasu, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, ul.Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa

Bibliografia

  • Akashi N. 1997. Dispersion pattern and mortality of seeds and seedlings of Fagus crenata Blume in a cool temperate forest in western Japan. Ecological Research 12: 159-165.
  • Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska M., Drozdowski S., Brzeziecki B., Rutkowska P., Jabłońska B. 2014. Effect of different methods of site preparation on natural regeneration of Pinus sylvestris in eastern Poland. Dendrobiology 71: 73-81.
  • Andrzejczyk T., Augustyniak G. 2007. Wpływ przygotowania gleby na wzrost sosny zwyczajnej w pierwszych latach uprawy. Sylwan 151 (8): 3-8.
  • Archibold O. W., Acton C., Ripley E. A. 2000. Effect of site preparation on soil properties and vegetation cover, and the growth and survival of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings, in Saskatchewan. Forest Ecology and Management 131: 127-141.
  • Bedford L., Sutton R. F. 2000. Site preparation for establishing lodgepole pine in the sub-boreal spruce zone of interior British Columbia: the Bednesti trial, 10-year results. Forest Ecology and Management 126: 227-238.
  • Bergsten U. 1989. Temperature tolerance of invigorated seeds of Pinus sylvestris L., and Picea abies (L.) Karst. using TTGP-test. Forestry (Supplement) 62: 107-115.
  • Bilodeau-Gauthier S., Paré D., Messier C., Bélanger N. 2011. Juvenile growth of hybrid poplars on acid boreal soil determined by environmental effects of soil preparation, vegetation control, and fertilization. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 620-629.
  • Block M. D., Van Rees K. C. J. 2002. Mechanical site preparation impacts on soil properties and vegetation communities in the Northwest Territories. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 1381-1392.
  • Boateng J. O., Heineman J. L., McClarnon J., Bedford L. 2006. Twenty year responses of white spruce to mechanical site preparation and early chemical release in the boreal region of northeastern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 2386-2399.
  • Caccia F. D., Ballaré C. L. 1998. Effects of tree cover, understory vegetation, and litter on regeneration of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga manziessii) in southwestern Argentina. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 683-692.
  • Collet C., Moguedec G. 2007. Individual seedling mortality as a function in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Forestry 80: 359-370.
  • Drought and agriculture. 1975. WMO Note 138. Publ. WMO-392. Geneva.
  • Heiskanen J., Mäkitalo K., Hyvönen J. 2007. Long-term influence of site preparation on water-retention characteristics of forest soil in Finnish Lapland. Forest Ecology and Management 241: 127-133.
  • Hille M., den Ouden J. 2004. Improved recruitment and early growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings after fire and soil scarification. European Journal of Forest Research 123: 213-218.
  • Ibáńez I., Schupp E. W. 2002. Effects of litter, soil surface conditions, and microhabitat on Cerocarpus ledifolius Nutt. seedling emergence and establishment. Journal of Arid Environments 52: 209-221.
  • Jäderlund A., Norberg G., Zackrisson O., Dahlberg A., Teketay D., Dolling A., Nilsson M. C. 1998. Control of bilberry vegetation by steam treatment – effects on seeded Scots pine and associated mycorrhizal fungi. Forest Ecology and Management 108: 275-285.
  • Karlsson M., Nilsson U. 2005. The effects of scarification and shelterwood treatments on naturally regenerated seedlings in southern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 205: 183-197.
  • Karlsson C., Örlander G. 2000. Soil scarification shortly before a rich seed fall improves seedling establishment in seed tree stands of Pinus sylvestris. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15: 256-266.
  • Löf M., Dey D. C., Navarro R. M., Jacobs D. F. 2012. Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration. New Forests 43: 825-848.
  • MacKenzie M. D., Schmidt M. G., Bedford L. 2005. Soil microclimate and nitrogen availability 10 years after mechanical site preparation in northern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 1854-1866.
  • Mäkitalo K. 1999. Effect of site preparation and reforestation method on survival and height growth of Scots pine. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14: 512-525.
  • de Martonne E. 1926. Une nouvelle fanction climatologique: l’indice d’aridité. La Météoroligie 2: 449-458.
  • Mattsson S., Bergsten U. 2003. Pinus contorta growth in northern Sweden as affected by soil scarification. New Forests 26: 217-231.
  • Mattsson L., Li C.-Z. 1993. The non-timber value of northern Swedish Forest – an economic analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8: 426-434.
  • Munson A. D., Timmer V. R. 1995. Soil nitrogen dynamics and nutrition of pine following silvicultural treatments in boreal and Great lakes – St. Lawrence plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 76: 169-179.
  • Neugebauer Z. 2008. Poradnik dla operatorów maszyn leśnych agregowanych na ciągnikach. DGLP, Warszawa – Bedoń.
  • Nilsson U., Örlander G. 1999. Vegetation management on grass – dominated clearcuts planted with Norway spruce in southern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1015-1026.
  • Nordborg F., Nilsson U. 2003. Growth, damage and net nitrogen uptake in Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings, effects of site preparation and fertilization. Annals of Forest Science 60: 657-666.
  • Oleskog G., Grip H., Bergsten U., Sahlén K. 2000. Seedling emergence of Pinus sylvestris in characterized seedbed substrates under different moisture conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1766-1777.
  • Oleskog G., Sahlén K. 2000. Effect of seedbed substrate on moisture conditions and germination of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seeds in a mixed conifer stand. New Forests 20: 119-133.
  • Operat Urządzenia Lasu dla Nadleśnictwa Spychowo na lata 2013-2022. 2013. RDLP w Olsztynie.
  • Pigan I. 2009. Wpływ sposobu przygotowania gleby na stan upraw sosnowych w warunkach siedlisk wilgotnych. Sylwan 153 (11): 745-757.
  • Pigan I. 2010. Odnowienie naturalne sosny (Pinus sylvestris L.) na siedliskach wilgotnych przy zastosowaniu różnych metod przygotowania gleby. Sylwan 154 (8): 524-534.
  • Prévost M. 1997. Effects of scarification on seedbed coverage and natural regeneration after a group seed-tree cutting in a black spruce (Picea mariana) stand. Forest Ecology and Management 94: 219-231.
  • Puhlick J. J., Laughlin D. C., Moor M. M. 2012. Factors influencing ponderosa pine regeneration in the southwestern USA. Forest Ecology and Management 264: 10-19.
  • Raport o stanie lasów. 2014. http://www.lasy.gov.pl/informacje/publikacje/informacje-statystyczne-i-raporty/raport-o-stanie-lasow/raport-o-stanie-lasow-w-polsce-2014/view. Dostęp: 28 września 2016.
  • Rodriguez-Garcia E., Grater G., Bravo F. 2011. Climatic variability and Rother site factor influence on natural regeneration of Pinus pinaster Ait. in Mediterranean forests. Annals of Forest Science 68: 811-823.
  • Sewerniak P., Gonet S. S., Quaium M. 2012. Wpływ przygotowania gleby frezem leśnym na wzrost sadzonek sosny zwyczajnej w warunkach ubogich siedlisk Puszczy Bydgoskiej. Sylwan 156 (11): 871-880.
  • Steijlen I., Nilsson M.-C., Zackrisson O. 1995. Seed regeneration of Scots pine in boreal forest stands dominated by lichen and feather moss. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25 (5): 713-723.
  • Tomczyk S. 1993. Odnowienie naturalne. Sosna. Biblioteczka Leśniczego 29.
  • Wallertz K., Malmqvis C. 2013. The effect of mechanical site preparation methods on the establishment of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) in southern Sweden. Forestry 86: 71-78.
  • Willoughby I., Jinks R. L., Kerr G., Gosling P. G. 2004. Factors affecting the success of direct seeding for lowland afforestation in the UK. Forestry 77: 467-482.
  • Zarządzenie Nr 15/2012 z dnia 20.09.2012 Nadleśniczego Nadleśnictwa Spychowo w sprawie kryteriów uznawania odnowień naturalnych oraz w sprawie przeprowadzania ocen upraw w Nadleśnictwie Spychowo. 2012a.
  • Zarządzenie Nr 47A z dnia 30 września 2005 r. Dyrektora Generalnego Lasów Państwowych w sprawie nowelizacji zaleceń w zakresie uznawania, oceny i ewidencjonowania odnowień naturalnych. 2005.
  • Zarządzenie Nr 58/2012 z dnia 31.08.2012 r. Dyrektora Generalnego Lasów Państwowych w sprawie zaleceń w zakresie uznawania, ewidencjonowania i oceny odnowień naturalnych. 2012b.
  • Zasady hodowli lasu. 2012. DGLP, Warszawa.
  • Żybura H., Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska M., Drozdowski S., Wołczyk Z. 2016. Wpływ sposobu postępowania z pozostałościami zrębowymi i przygotowania gleby na zrębie na wzrost sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) w 6-letniej uprawie. Sylwan 160 (4): 267-276.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-42228d11-5f68-495c-b3dd-94db3a0099fd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.