Computed tomography measurement of the bone matrix of vertebral pedicle and its clinical significance

• Autorzy: Li X. , Wang X. , Gao S. , En H. , Zhang Y. , Wang H. , Cai Y. , Wang Z. , Li Z. , Zhang C. , Ma J. , Zhang S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: To provide the anatomic basis for the clinical application of the transpedicular screw fixation. Materials and methods: Thirty spine (C₂ –L₅) specimens were used. The width of the pedicle cortex and width of the pedicle medullary cavity (WPC and WPMC), and the height of the pedicle cortex and height of the pedicle medullary cavity (HPC and HPMC) were measured at the isthmus of the pedicle using computed tomography (CT) scanning. Results: Width of the pedicle medullary cavity changed in a three-dovetailed-saddle shape with four peaks and three valleys, namely C₂ (high), C₄’₅ (low), T₂ (high), T₄ (the lowest), T₁₂ (high), L₁ (low) and L₅ (the highest). HPMC of the cervical pedicle changed in a saddle shape, gradually increasing from C₅–L₅. WPC, WPMC, HPC and HPMC showed a regular change, respectively. In each segment, the superior border of the pedicle cortex had a nearly consistent thickness to the interior border within an identical pedicle, while the pedicle cortex thickness radio of the medial and lateral border was nearly 3:1 among the cervical pedicles, 2:1 among thoracic pedicles, and 1:1 among lumbar pedicles. Conclusions: Both HPMC and WPMC are the dominant factors for the choice of screw diameter, but HPMC should also be considered in C2 –T₁ pedicles, especially C₆ and C₇. Additionally, the screw for C₃₋₆ or T₄₋₆ pedicles should be about 3.0 mm in diameter. (Folia Morphol 2019; 78, 3: 476–480)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 78
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.476–480,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Li X.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Wang X.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Gao S.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

En H.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Zhang Y.

• Department of CT Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Wang H.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Cai Y.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Wang Z.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Li Z.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Zhang C.

• The Third Clinical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Ma J.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

autor

Zhang S.

• Department of Anatomy, Basic Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan Economic Development Zone, Huhhot 010110, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China

Bibliografia

• 1. Cahueque Lemus MA, Cobar Bustamante AE, Ortiz Muciño A, et al. Clinical outcome of anterior vs posterior approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop. 2016; 13(3): 123–126, doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.03.006, indexed in Pubmed: 27076742.
• 2. Koktekir E, Toktas ZO, Seker A, et al. Anterior transpedicular screw fixation of cervical spine: Is it safe? Morphological feasibility, technical properties, and accuracy of manual insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(6): 596–604, doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14669, indexed in Pubmed: 25815805.
• 3. Li J, Zhao L, Qi F, et al. Three-dimensional finite-element study on anterior transpedicular screw fixation system of the subaxial cervical spine. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015; 53(11): 841–846, indexed in Pubmed: 26813839.
• 4. Ninomiya K, Iwatsuki K, Ohnishi YI, et al. Radiological evaluation of the initial fixation between cortical bone trajectory and conventional pedicle screw technique for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(2): 251–257, doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.251, indexed in Pubmed: 27114765.
• 5. Srivastava SK, Nemade PS, Aggarwal RA, et al. Congenital absence of posterior elements of C2 vertebra with atlanto-axial dislocation and basilar invagination: a case report and review of literature. Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(1): 170–175, doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.170, indexed in Pubmed: 26949474.
• 6. Tang X, Cao Q, Chen L, et al. Anatomic study on entry point and implant technique for C2 pedicle screw fixation. hongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015; 29(2): 175–178, indexed in Pubmed: 26455145.
• 7. Wu H, Chen Y, Zhang C, et al. [Application of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative disease]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014; 94(23): 1764–1768, doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.23.002, indexed in Pubmed: 25154836.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0009