Isolation and identification of bacteria from Chlorpyrifos polluted soil

• Autorzy: Santhoshkumar M. , Mahakavi T. , Baskaran L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present study aimed to isolate and identify the chlorpyrifos resistant soil bacteria from contaminated soils in order to be used for bioremediation of polluted environments. Bacteria were isolated from two cultivated plant root rhizopheric soil of Cocks comb (Celosia cristata) and Marigold (Tagetes erecta).The pesticide was tested at 5 elevated doses,0.5%, 1%, 2%, 2.5% and control. Physiochemical properties of soils, PH, Electrical conductivity, Organic carbon, Organic matter, Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, Manganese and Iron were analyzed. Based on morphological and biochemical tests the isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Thus, the organisms can be exploited for bioremediation of chlorpyrifos polluted soil, and their ability to degrade other organophosphates pesticide.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cockscomb; Celosia cristata; marigold; Tagetes erecta; bacterial isolation; Bacillus subtilis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas putida; bioremediation; chlorpyrifos; polluted soil

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: International Letters of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 45
• Opis fizyczny: p.23-26,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Santhoshkumar M.

• Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai nagar, India-608 002

autor

Mahakavi T.

• Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai nagar, India-608 002

autor

Baskaran L.

• Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai nagar, India-608 002

Bibliografia

• [1] Ali Mohammad Latifi, Samaneh Khodi, Morteza Mirzaei, Mohsen Miresmaeili and Hamid Babavalian. Afri. Jour. of Biotech. 1(13) (2011) 3140-3146.
• [2] Enriqueta-Arias, M., Gonzalez-Perez, J.A., Gonzalez-Vila, F.J., Ball, A.S 8 (2005)13-21.
• [3] Gamo´n M., E Sa´ez E., Gil J., Boluda R. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 44 (2003) 141–151.
• [4] Jackson, M.L., 1958. In: Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.
• [5] Moses M., Johnston E.S., Anger W.K., Burse V.W., Horstman S.W., Kackson R.J., Lewis R.G., Maddy K.T., McConnell R., Meggs W.J., Zahm S.H. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 9 (1993) 913–959.
• [6] Monkiedje A. Ilori, M.O.Spiteller, M.Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 34 (2002) 1939-1948.
• [7] Pankhurst, C.E., Doube, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R., 1997. Biological indicators of soil health. Synthesis. In: Pankhurst, C.E., Doube, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R. (Eds.), Biological Indicators of Soil Health. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 419-435.
• [8] Piper, C., 1966. Soil and plant analysis.Asian Hans Publishers, Bombay, pp. 11-36.
• [9] Redondo M.J., Ruiz M.J., Font G., Boluda R. Arch. Environ. Conta. Toxicol. 32 (1997) 346–352.
• [10] Ros, M., Goberna, M. Moreno, J.L. Hernandez, Akhtar S, Gilani S T S, Hasan N.. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 36(4) (2006) 863–870.
• [11] Shail Ahmed and Muhammed Shakeel Ahmed, Pak. Entomol. 34 (2) (2006) 63-67.
• [12] Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.LA rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 25 (1956) 259-60.
• [13] Ubuoh, E.A., Akhionbare, S.M.O. and Akhionbare, W.N..Inter. Jur. Multidisciplinary Sci. & Engin. 3(2) (2012) 34.
• [14] Wan, R.,Wang, Z., Xie, S. Science of the Total Environment. 472 (2014) 502-508.
• [15] Xinbin Zhou, Xiaojun Shi, Lamei Zhang and Yongxiang Zhou. Energy Procedia 16 (2012)284 – 289.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.45.23