Using material flow analysis for waste management planning

• Autorzy: Markic D.N. , Carapina H.S. , Bielic D. , Bielic L.S. , Ilic P. , Pesic Z.S. , Kikanovicz O.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main objectives of waste management are environmental preservation, the safeguarding of human health, and natural resources conservation. Material flow analysis/ substances flow analysis (MFA/SFA) method takes into account the consideration of the “metabolic” system of waste management, which means monitoring waste flows and substances within the model for waste management, and examining all inputs and outputs in the system, as well as their evaluation and comparison. Modeled scenarios in the Banjaluka region of the Republic of Srpska (RS) were developed in accordance with both the European Union (EU) and RS legislation, as well as relevant municipal waste management strategic documents. Modeled municipal solid waste (MSW) management scenarios are compared with the current waste management system. Using MFA/SFA (waste flow, carbon, and nitrogen), a complete view of flow, transformations, and final waste disposal and substances in modeled scenarios of waste management is realized. Results of this study suggest that in the future, more activity should be based on the separate collection and recycling, compared to the current, inadequate MSW management system that is based only on the disposal of waste. The combination of material and substance flows analyses is an effective tool in the decision-making process for the development and improvement of MSW management.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.255-265,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Markic D.N.

• DEP-OT Public Utility Regional Landfill, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

autor

Carapina H.S.

• Faculty of Environmental Protection, Educons University, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia

autor

Bielic D.

• DEP-OT Public Utility Regional Landfill, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

autor

Bielic L.S.

• Faculty of Health Sciences Pan-European University Apeiron, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

autor

Ilic P.

• PSI Institute for Protection and Ecology of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

autor

Pesic Z.S.

• DEP-OT Public Utility Regional Landfill, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina

autor

Kikanovicz O.

• Faculty of Environmental Protection, Educons University, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia

Bibliografia

• 1. SEADON J.K. Sustainable waste management system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1639, 2010.
• 2. DIJKEMA G.P.J., REUTER M.A., VERHOEF E.V. A new paradigm for waste management. Waste Management, 20, 633, 2000.
• 3. MARSHALL R.E., FARAHBAKHSH K. System approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Management, 33, 9883, 2013.
• 4. ZURBRÜGG C., GFRERER M., ASHADI H., BRENNER W., KÜPER, D. Determinants of sustainability in solid waste management – The Gianyar Waste Recovery Project in Indonesia. Waste Management, 32, 2126, 2012.
• 5. ALJARADIN M., PERSSON K.M. Environmental impact of municipal solid waste landfills in semi-arid climates-case study–Jordan. The Open Waste Management Journal, 5 (1), 28-39, 2012.
• 6. ISMAIL S.N.S., MANAF L.A. The challenge of future landfill: A case study of Malaysia. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 5 (6), 86, 2013.
• 7. UNEP. United Nations Environment Programme. Global Waste Management Outlook. 2015. Available online: http://web.unep.org/ourplanet/september-2015/unep-publications/global-waste-management-outlook (accessed on February 2017.)
• 8. ÖZBAY I. Evaluation of municipal solid waste management practices for an industrialized city. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (2), 2015.
• 9. MIHAJLOV A., STEVANOVIĆ-ČARAPINA H. Rethinking waste management within the resource-efficient concept. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14, 2973, 2015.
• 10. INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS OF FB&H. Statistical Yearbook Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Environment, 21-9: 324, 2014. Available online: http://www.fzs.ba/god.htm (accessed on March 2015.)
• 11. INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS (Republic of Srpska), Statistical Yearbook of Republic of Srpska. Environment 16, 298, 2016. Available online: http://www.rzs.rs.ba/front/article/2240/?left_mi=287&add=287 (accessed on March 2015.)
• 12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission staff working document Bosnia and Herzegovina 2014, Progress report, Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2014-2015. 2014.
• 13. KADAFA A.A., MANAF L.A., AZMIN SULAIMAN W.N., ABDULLAH S.H. Applications of system analysis techniques in Solid Waste Management assessment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23 (4), 106, 2014.
• 14. PIRES A., MARTINHO G., CHANG N.B. Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 92 (4), 1033, 2011.
• 15. BJELIĆ D., ČARAPINA H.S., MARKIĆ D.N., PEŠIĆ Ž.Š., MIHAJLOV A., VUKIĆ L. Environmental assessment of waste management in Banjaluka region with focus on landfilling. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14 (6), 1455, 2015.
• 16. EURO-INSPEKT. Testing laboratories, Doboj, B&H. Report on the elemental analysis and morphological composition of waste to Banjaluka landfill, Public utility “DEP-OT” Regional landfill Banjaluka, 2016 [In Serbian].
• 17. BRUNNER P.H. Materials flow analysis and the ultimate sink. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8 (3), 4, 2004.
• 18. EUROSTAT. Economy wide material flow accounts: Compilation guidelines for reporting to the 2009. Eurostat questionnaire, 2009.
• 19. STEUBING B., BÖNI H., SCHLUEP M., SILVA U., LUDWIG C. Assessing computer waste generation in Chile using material flow analysis. Waste Management, 30 (3), 473, 2010.
• 20. BRUNNER P.H., RECHBERGER H. Practical Handbook of material flow analysis. Boca Raton/London/New York/Washington D.C/Florida: Lewis Publishers CRC press, 2004.
• 21. STEVANOVIĆ-ČARAPINA H., ŽUGIĆ-DRAKULIĆ N., MIHAJLOV A., ČARAPINA-RADOVANOVIĆ I. MFA and LCA as Analytical Instruments in Environmental Protection. Environment for Europe. Limes. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 27, 2014 [In Serbian].
• 22. ARENA U., DI GREGORIO F. A waste management planning based on substance flow analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85, 54, 2014.
• 23. ARENA U., DI GREGORIO F. Element partitioning in combustion-and gasification-based waste-to-energy units. Waste Management, 33 (5), 1142, 2013.
• 24. DÖBERL G., HUBER R., BRUNNER P.H., EDER M., PIERRARD R., SCHÖNBÄCK W., FRÜHWIRTH W., HUTTERER H. Long-term assessment of waste management options-a new, integrated and goal-oriented approach. Waste Management & Research, 20 (4), 311, 2002.
• 25. MASTELLONE M.L., BRUNNER P.H., ARENA U. Scenarios of waste management for a waste emergency area. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13 (5), 735, 2009.
• 26. SOKKA L., ANTIKAINEN R., KAUPPI P. Flows of nitrogen and phosphorus in municipal waste: a substance flow analysis in Finland. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, 1 (1-3), 165, 2004.
• 27. STANISAVLJEVIC N., BRUNNER P.H. Combination of material flow analysis and substance flow analysis: A powerful approach for decision support in waste management. Waste Management & Research, 32 (8), 733, 2014.
• 28. STANISAVLJEVIC N., VUJOVIC S., ZIVANCEV M., BATINIC B., TOT B., UBAVIN D. Application of MFA as a decision support tool for waste management in small municipalities - case study of Serbia. Waste Management & Research, 33 (6), 550, 2015.
• 29. FEHRINGER R., BRANDT B., BRUNNER P.H., DAXBECK H., NEUMAYER S., SMUTNY R. MFA-Manual. Guidelines for the use of material flow analysis (MFA) for municipal solid waste (MSW) management. Project AWAST; Aid in the management and European Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment methods for a global and sustainable approach. Vienna University of Technology & Resource Management Agency, Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres & Stuttgart University, 2004.
• 30. BRUNNER P.H., TJELL J.C. Do we need sinks?. Waste Management & Research, 30 (1), 1, 2012.
• 31. DIRECTIVE 1999/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the landfill of waste, Official Journal of the European Communities L 182, 1, 1999.
• 32. DIRECTIVE 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and Council on packaging and packaging waste, Official Journal of the European Communities L 365, 10, 1994.
• 33. OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA NO. 36/15. The Directive on landfill waste disposal. 2015 [In Serbian].
• 34. OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA NO. 36/15. The packaging and packaging waste Directive. 2012 [In Serbian].
• 35. CHRISTENSEN T.H., MANFREDI S., KNOX K. Landfilling: Reactor landfills. Solid Waste Technology & Management, Volume 1 & 2, 772, 2011.
• 36. KOTOVICOVÁ J., TOMAN F., VAVERKOVÁ M., STEJSKAL B. Evaluation of waste landfills’ impact on the environment using bioindicators. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 20 (2), 371, 2011.
• 37. HOSSAIN M. L., DAS S.R., HOSSAIN M.K. Impact of landfill leachate on surface and ground water quality. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7 (6), 337, 2014.
• 38. NARAYANA T. Municipal solid waste management in India: From waste disposal to recovery of resources?. Waste Management, 29 (3), 1163, 2009.
• 39. NILOUFER S., SWAMY A.V.V.S., DEVI K.S. Ground water quality in the vicinity of municipal solid waste dump sites in Vijayawada, International Journal of Engineering & Science Research 3 (8), 419, 2013.
• 40. PABLOS M.V., MARTINI F., FERNANDEZ C., BABIN M.M., HERRAEZ I., MIRANDA J., MARTÍNEZ J., CARBONELL G., SAN-SEGUNDO L., GARCÍA-HORTIGÜELA P., TARAZONA J.V. Correlation between physicochemical and ecotoxicological approaches to estimate landfill leachates toxicity. Waste Management, 31 (8), 1841, 2011.
• 41. PEARCE A.R., RIZZO D.M., MOUSER P.J. Subsurface characterization of groundwater contaminated by landfill leachate using microbial community profile data and a nonparametric decision - making process. Water Resources Research, 47 (6), 2011.
• 42. VAVERKOVÁ M., TOMAN F., KOTOVICOVÁ J. Research into the occurrence of some plant species as indicators of landfill impact on the environment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21 (3), 755, 2012.
• 43. FEHRINGER R., RECHBERGER H., PESONEN H.L., BRUNNER P.H. Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher Szenarien der thermischen Verwertung von Abfällen in Österreich (Projek: ASTRA). Institut für Wassergüte und Abfallwirtschaft – Abteilung Abfallwirtschaft, Technische Universität Wienh, 1997.
• 44. BRUNNER P.H., DOEBERL G., EDER M., FRŰHWIRTH W., HUBER R., HUTTERER H., PIERRARD R., SCHÖNBÄCK W., WÖGINGER H. Bewertung abfallwirtschaftlicher Manahmen mit dem Ziel der nachsorgefreien Deponie (Projekt: BEWEND). Monographien des UBA Band 149, Umweltbundesamt GmbH Wien, 2001.
• 45. BOLDRIN A., ANDERSEN J.K., CHRISTENSEN T.H. Environmental assessment of garden waste management in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark. Waste Management, 31 (7), 1560, 2011
• 46. ANDERSEN J.K., BOLDRIN A., CHRISTENSEN T.H., SCHEUTZ C. Mass balances and life cycle inventory of home composting of organic waste. Waste Management, 31 (9), 1934, 2011.
• 47. BOLDRIN A., CHRISTENSEN T.H., KÖRNER I., KROGMANN U. Composting: mass balances and product quality. Solid Waste Technology & Management, 1 & 2, 569, 2011.
• 48. BERNSTAD A., LA COUR JANSEN J., ASPEGREN H. Life cycle assessment of a household solid waste source separation programme: a Swedish case study. Waste Management & Research, 29 (10), 1027, 2011.
• 49. GIUGLIANO M., CERNUSCHI S., GROSSO M., RIGAMONTI L. Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment. Waste Management, 31 (9), 2092, 2011.
• 50. STRANDDORF H.K., HOFFMANN L., SCHMIDT A. Impact categories, normalization and weighting in LCA, updated on selected EDIP97-data. Environmental News No. 78. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Danish Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/78621