Anatomical features of the radial artery in the Xinjiang population in China and its impact on the transradial coronary intervention procedure

• Autorzy: Naman T. , Li G.Q. , Cheng H. , Hu B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The anatomical features of the radial artery (RA) influence the transradial coronary intervention. The aim of this study is to discuss the anatomical features of the RA in the Xinjiang population and to guide interventionists in decreasing complications and improving success rates. Materials and methods: We enrolled 1731 patients in this study. All relevant basic information was recorded in detail, and the RA diameter was examined. Patients were divided into a RA variation group and a RA non-variation group; univariate and multivariate factor analyses were performed to evaluate the relevant factors for RA diameter and the predictive value of the variable factors in RA variations. Results: The mean RA diameter for all patients was 3.01 ± 0.14 mm. The multi-factorial analysis showed that height, gender, and occupation are significantly associated with RA diameter (p < 0.05). The incidence of RA variation was 4.97% (86/1731). Multi-factorial analysis showed that: gender (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.469–5.037, p < 0.01), occupation (OR 2.228, 95% CI 1.0.000–0.012, p < 0.001) and RA inner diameter (OR 0.002, 95% CI 0.000–0.012, p < 0.001) are significantly associated with the incidence of RA variation. Conclusions: The mean RA diameter in the Xinjiang population was 3.01 ± 0.14 mm, height, gender, occupation are associated with RA diameter, gender, farmer, RA diameter are associated with RA variation. These factors can guide the interventionists to choose the appropriate equipment before the operation then can increase the efficiency of operation and prevent from the complications. (Folia Morphol 2020; 79, 2: 226–235)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 79
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.226-235,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Naman T.

• People’s Hospital of Yakan County in Xinjiang China, Yakan in Xinjiang China, Yakan, China

autor

Li G.Q.

• People’s Hospital of Yakan County in Xinjiang China, Yakan in Xinjiang China, Yakan, China

autor

Cheng H.

• People’s Hospital of Yakan County in Xinjiang China, Yakan in Xinjiang China, Yakan, China

autor

Hu B.

• Department of Cardiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(2): 349–356, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034, indexed in Pubmed: 15261930.
• 2. Bertrand OF, De Larochellière R, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. A randomized study comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial coronary stent implantation. Circulation. 2006; 114(24): 2636–2643, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.638627, indexed in Pubmed: 17145988.
• 3. Bi XL, Fu XH, Gu XS, et al. Influence of puncture site on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016; 129(8): 898–902, doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179795, indexed in Pubmed: 27064032.
• 4. Cantor WJ, Mahaffey KW, Huang Z, et al. Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 69(1): 73–83, doi: 10.1002/ccd.20897, indexed in Pubmed: 17139670.
• 5. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008; 94(8): 1019–1025, doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.136390, indexed in Pubmed: 18332059.
• 6. Dandekar VK, Vidovich MI, Shroff AR. Complications of transradial catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012; 13(1): 39–50, doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.08.005, indexed in Pubmed: 22115936.
• 7. Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, et al. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 69(6): 815–820, doi: 10.1002/ccd.21021, indexed in Pubmed: 17191214.
• 8. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009; 157(1): 132–140, doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023, indexed in Pubmed: 19081409.
• 9. Kassam S, Cantor WJ, Patel D, et al. Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Can J Cardiol. 2004; 20(14): 1439–1442, indexed in Pubmed: 15614338.
• 10. Kiemeneij F, Hofland J, Laarman GJ, et al. Cost comparison between two modes of Palmaz Schatz coronary stent implantation: transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath-protected stent technique. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995; 35(4): 301–8, discussion 309, doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810350405, indexed in Pubmed: 7497502.
• 11. Li L, Zeng ZY, Zhong JM, et al. Features and variations of a radial artery approach in southern Chinese populations and their clinical significance in percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013; 126(6): 1046–1052, indexed in Pubmed: 23506576.
• 12. Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart. 2009; 95(5): 410–415, doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.150474, indexed in Pubmed: 18977799.
• 13. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(3): 572–576, doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00288-5, indexed in Pubmed: 9741495.
• 14. Nie B, Zhou Yj, Li Gz, et al. Clinical study of arterial anatomic variations for transradial coronary procedure in Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009; 122(18): 2097–2102, indexed in Pubmed: 19781291.
• 15. Numasawa Y, Kawamura A, Kohsaka S, et al. Anatomical variations affect radial artery spasm and procedural achievement of transradial cardiac catheterization. Heart Vessels. 2014; 29(1): 49–57, doi: 10.1007/s00380-013-0324-3, indexed in Pubmed: 23430268.
• 16. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 1(4): 379–386, doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007, indexed in Pubmed: 19463333.
• 17. Sciahbasi A, Pristipino C, Ambrosio G, et al. Arterial access-site-related outcomes of patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes (from the ComPaRison of Early Invasive and Conservative Treatment in Patients With Non-ST-ElevatiOn Acute Coronary Syndromes [PRESTO-ACS] Vascular Substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103(6): 796–800, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.049, indexed in Pubmed: 19268734.
• 18. Trilla M, Freixa X, Regueiro A, et al. Impact of Aging on Radial Spasm During Coronary Catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015; 27(12): E303–E307, indexed in Pubmed: 26630646.
• 19. Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G, et al. Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 67(6): 870–878, doi: 10.1002/ccd.20732, indexed in Pubmed: 16649233.
• 20. Wiper A, Kumar S, MacDonald J, et al. Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: a four-year single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 68(4): 549–553, doi: 10.1002/ccd.20743, indexed in Pubmed: 16969848.
• 21. Yan Zx, Zhou Yj, Zhao Yx, et al. Anatomical study of forearm arteries with ultrasound for percutaneous coronary procedures. Circ J. 2010; 74(4): 686–692, doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0577, indexed in Pubmed: 20197630.
• 22. Yang HJ, Gil YC, Jung WS, et al. Variations of the superficial brachial artery in Korean cadavers. J Korean Med Sci. 2008; 23(5): 884–887, doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.5.884, indexed in Pubmed: 18955798.
• 23. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol. 2005; 101(3): 421–427, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.061, indexed in Pubmed: 15907410.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0074