Carbon allowance allocation on Chinese industrial sectors in 2030 under multiple indicators

• Autorzy: Zhou J. , Jin B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Aiming at China’s “2030 target,” and given the key role of industrial sectors in CO₂ emission reduction, this paper selects the path of allocating carbon emission allowance among different industrial sectors. By selecting CO₂ accumulation emissions, the industry-added value and the CO₂ emission efficiency which is calculated by the super-SBM model, a carbon intensity distribution model has been established for the allocation. Considering the different preferences of policymakers, different weights are used, meanwhile, an entropy weighting method is proposed to make a contrast. The main conclusions of this paper are: 1) The tendency of decision makers to assign principles has a great impact on the distribution of responsibility for the industry’s emission reduction responsibilities. 2) CO₂ emission intensity and carbon dioxide emission efficiency of various industries in China are very different, which is mainly related to the energy consumption demand, input, and output of various industries. 3) More historical accumulated emission and carbon intensity will shoulder more intensity reduction burden, and the industrial sector with the heaviest reduction burdens are those with the two high indicators, regardless of the tendency of decision makers.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.1981-1997,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zhou J.

• North China Electric Power University, Hebei, China

autor

Jin B.

• North China Electric Power University, Hebei, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Mikael Höök, Xu Tang Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change-A review. Energy Policy 52, 797, 2013.
• 2. Jesse D. Jenkins. Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design?. Energy Policy 69, 467, 2014.
• 3. Hideki Fukui, Chikage Miyoshi The impact of aviation fuel tax on fuel consumption and carbon emissions:The case of the US airline industry. Transportation Research Part D 50, 234, 2017.
• 4. Lixu Li, Yina Li, Fei Ye, Li Zhang Carbon dioxide emissions quotas allocation in the Pearl River Delta region: Evidence from the maximum deviation method. Journal of Cleaner Production 177, 207, 2018.
• 5. Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research, 2017. CICERO. An interdisciplinary research centre for climate research and environmental science/environmental studies in Oslo.Available online: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_International_Climate_and_Environmental_Research>.(accessed on 2017)
• 6. China’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution: Enhanced Actions on Climate Change. http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Submission Pages/ Submissions. aspx (accessed on 8 November 2016).
• 7. National Development and Reform Commission, 2017. NDRC. Notice of the national development and reform commission on the issuance of the national carbon emission trading market construction scheme (power generation industry). Climate change regulation. [2017] no. 2191. Available online:<http://www.chinasmartgrid.com.cn/news/20171221/626557. shtml>(accessed on 2017)
• 8. Xiang Ji, Guo, Zhaohua Wang Allocation of emission permits for China’s power plants: A systemic Pareto optimal method. Applied Energy 204, 607, 2017.
• 9. Yujie Lu, Xinyuan Zhu, Qingbin Cui Effectiveness and equity implications of carbon policies in the United States construction industry. Building and Environment 49, 259, 2012.
• 10. Ying Liu, Kankesu Jayanthakumaran, Frank Neri Who is responsible for the CO₂ emissions that China produces?. Energy Policy 62, 1412, 2013.
• 11. Hailin Mu, Huanan Li, Ming Zhang, Miao Li Analysis of China’s carbon dioxide flow for 2008. Energy Policy 54, 320, 2013.
• 12. Christoph B¨hringer, Knut Einar Rosendahl Strategic partitioning of emission allowances under the EU Emission Trading Scheme. Resource and Energy Economics 31, 182, 2009.
• 13. Boqiang Lin, Hongxun Liu CO₂ emissions of China’s commercial and residential buildings: Evidence and reduction policy. Building and Environment 92, 418, 2015.
• 14. Ling Xiong, Bo Shen, Shaozhou Qi, Lynn Price, Bin Ye The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: A comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California. Applied Energy 185, 1849, 2017.
• 15. Zhou P., Wang M. Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review. Ecological Economics 125, 47, 2016.
• 16. Yi-Ming Wei, Le-Le Zou, Kai Wang, Wen-Jin Yi, Lu Wang Review of proposals for an Agreement on Future Climate Policy: Perspectives from the responsibilities for GHG reduction. Energy Strategy Reviews 2, 161, 2013.
• 17. Fengcai Zhao, GangYinlii, Lan Gao Establishing the fair allocation of international aviation carbon emission rights. Advances in Climate Change Research 5, 142, 2014.
• 18. Xunzhang Pan, Fei Teng a., Yuejiao Ha, Gehua Wang Equitable Access to Sustainable Development:Based on the comparative study of carbon emission rights allocation schemes. Applied Energy 130, 632, 2014.
• 19. Bas J. van Ruijvena, Matthias Weitzel, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Andries F. Hof, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Sonja Peterson, Daiju Narita Emission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approaches. Energy Policy 46, 116, 2012.
• 20. Wen-Jing Yi, Le-Le Zou, Jie Guo, Kai Wang, Yi-Ming Wei How can China reach its CO₂ intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development. Energy Policy 39, 2407, 2011.
• 21. Hongxun Liu, Boqiang Lin Cost-based modelling of optimal emission quota allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production 149, 472, 2017.
• 22. Wenjia Cai, Can Wang, Jining Chen Revisiting CO₂ mitigation potential and costs in China’s electricity sector. Energy Policy 38, 4209, 2010.
• 23. Ching Chih Chang, Tin Chia Lai Carbon allowance allocation in the transportation industry. Energy Policy 63, 1091, 2013.
• 24. Rose A. Reducing conflict in global warming policy: the potential of equity as a unifying principle. Energy Policy 18, 927, 1990.
• 25. Lasse Ringius, Asbjørn Torvanger, Bjart Holtsmark Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens?. Energy Policy 26 (10), 777, 1998.
• 26. Phylipsen G.J.M., Bode J.W., Blok K. Department of Science. A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble. Energy Policy 26 (12), 929, 1998.
• 27. Xunzhang Pan, Fei Teng, Yalin Tian, Gehua Wang Countries’emission allowances towards the low-carbon world:A consistent study. Applied Energy 155, 218, 2015.
• 28. Christoph Bo hringer, Andreas Lange On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances. European Economic Review 49, 2041, 2005.
• 29. Schmidt R.C., Jobst Heitzig Carbon leakage: Grandfathering as an incentive device to avert firm relocation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67, 209, 2014.
• 30. Jingna Ji, Zhiyong Zhang, Lei Yang Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O₂O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics 187, 68, 2107.
• 31. Michel G.J. den Elzen, Niklas, Niklas Höhne, Bernd Brouns, Harald Winkler, Herrmann E. Ott Differentiation of countries’future commitments in apost-2012 climate regime An assessment of the ‘South-North Dialogue’ Proposal. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 185, 2007.
• 32. Jaekyun Ahn Assessment of initial emission allowance allocation methods in the Korean electricity market. Energy Economics 43, 244, 2014.
• 33. Xiaoli Zhao, Haitao Yin, Yue Zhao Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO₂ emissions of power plants in China. Applied Energy 149, 238, 2015.
• 34. Zhuang Miao, Yong Feng, Jichuan Sheng Efficient allocation of CO₂ emissions in China: a zero sum gains data envelopment model. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, 4144, 2016.
• 35. Bo Meng, Jinjun Xue, Kuishuang Feng, Dabo Guan, Xue Fu China’s inter-regional spillover of carbon emissions and domestic supply chains. Energy Policy 61, 1305, 2013.
• 36. Hailin Mu, Linlin Li, Nan Li, Zhaoquan Xue, Longxi Li Allocation of carbon emission permits among industrial sectors in Liaoning province. Energy Procedia 104, 449, 2016.
• 37. Zhongbao Zhou, Cenjie Liu, Ximei Zeng, Yong Jiang, Wenbin Liu Carbon emission performance evaluation and allocation in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 1254, 2018.
• 38. Huanan Li, Yi-Ming Wei, Zhifu Mi China’s carbon flow: 2008-2012. Energy Policy 80, 45, 2015.
• 39. Ke Wang, Xian Zhang, Yi-Ming Wei, Shiwei Yu Regional allocation of CO₂ emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy 54, 214, 2013.
• 40. Lining Wang, Ding Ma, Wenying Chen Future CO₂ Emissions Allowances and Inequality Assessment under Different Allocation Regimes. Energy Procedia 61, 523, 2014.
• 41. Xunzhang Pan, Fei Teng a, Yalin Tian, Gehua Wang Countrie’emission allowances towards the low-carbon world:A consistent study. Applied Energy 155, 218, 2015.
• 42. Xunzhang Pan, Fei Teng, Gehua Wang Sharing emission space at an equitable basis: Allocation scheme based on the equal cumulative emission per capital principle. Applied Energy 113, 1810, 2014.
• 43. Rui Zhao, Ning Min, Yong Geng, Yulong He Allocation of carbon emissions among industries/sectors: An emissions intensity reduction constrained approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 142, 3083, 2017.
• 44. Jiarui Zhang, Weihua Zeng, Jinnan Wang, Fengle Yang, Hongqiang Jiang Regional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO₂ emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 163, 202, 2017.
• 45. Guangming Rao, Yong Wang, Ke Li, Na Wang Analysis on Chongqing Industry CO₂ Emissions Efficiency Difference and Its Emissions Reduction Potentials. Energy Procedia, 2011.
• 46. Yue-Jun Zhang, Jun-Fang Hao, Juan Song The CO₂ emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China’s industry: Evidence from the regional level. Applied Energy 174, 213, 2016.
• 47. Jiani Zhang, Jingfang Xiao, Xiaofang Chen, Xiaoming Liang, Liya Fan, Daiqi Ye Allowance and allocation of industrial volatile organic compounds emission in China for year 2020 and 2030. Jourrnal of environment alsciences, JES-01328, No of Pages 11, 2017.
• 48. IPCC, 2006. Greenhouse Gas Inventory:IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. United Kingdom Meteorological Office, Bracknell, England. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2011. US Energy and Carbon Flow Chart. Available online:.
• 49. Juan Wang, Tao Zhao, Xiaohu Zhang Environmental assessment and investment strategies of provincial industrial sector in China-Analysis based on DEA model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 60, 56, 2016.
• 50. Hong Li, Jin-feng Shi Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors:an improved Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Journal of Cleaner Production 65, 97, 2014.
• 51. Jiarui Zhang, Weihua Zeng, Jinnan Wang, Fengle Yang, Hongqiang Jiang Regional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO₂ emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 163, 202, 2017.
• 52. Tone K.A. Slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 143 (1), 32, 2001.
• 53. Hirofumi Fukuyama, Webe W.L. A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 43, 274, 2009.
• 54. Tone K., Sahoo B.K. Scale, indivisibilities and production function in data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 84, 165, 2003.
• 55. Yue-Jun Zhang, Jun-Fang Hao, Juan Song The CO₂ emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China’s industry: Evidence from the regional level. Applied Energy 174, 213, 2016.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/90599